The And theory of conservatism argues that a whole range of policies are more attractive when they are presented together. For example:
+ A tough policy on immigration is more acceptable (politically and morally) when linked to a commitment to the world's poorest people (see here).
+ Putting more people into prison should happen alongside effective rehabilitation programmes (see here).
+ Euthanasia and an effective duty-to-die should be kept illegal but hospices should receive more generous funding (see here).
The 'And theory' - first articulated in an early form by the great Oliver Letwin in the spring of 2003 - should become an iron discipline on Conservative politicians. It requires Tory MPs and policymakers to maintain (1) core (and popular) policy positions on Europe, tax and crime but twin them with (2) a broader conservative interest in such issues as global poverty, tackling the arms trade and combating pollution.
The fundamental 'And' is good for me and good for my neighbour.
I was thinking that this definition is almost an "aha!" moment; finally, someone trying to think strategically about how to appeal to core Tory values while developing bridgeheads into those parts of the world that most liberal commentators imagine are closed off to us. So I wasn't that surprised to read on and find out that Oliver Letwin, surely one of the best thinkers we havem was behind it.
Posted by: Graeme Archer | July 01, 2005 at 02:39 PM