In third place are the newspapers. This wasn't a good contest for them. The Telegraph followed opinion in the Tory party. It didn't lead it. It only endorsed Mr Cameron after it was clear he had already won. The Mail tried to get Ken Clarke elected and failed. It also failed to ignite the drugs row. The Sun was peripheral. The right-wing press never got their act together in this election contest and are unlikely to be as feared/ respected/ as influential ever again.
In second place I'm going to award the internet. I think this site and other bloggers have often been ahead of the newspapers but, much more importantly, have been the pollsters and YouGov, the internet pollster, in particular. I'll publish the full results of ConservativeDemocracy.com's survey soon (you can still take part by the way) but the lead reason for people voting for Mr Cameron was that they thought he was popular with the public. The Davis team were reportedly devastated by the YouGov poll of the weekend after conference which showed such a big swing to Mr Cameron.
In first place I'm awarding Nick Robinson, BBC's Political Editor, and Tom Bradby, his successor at ITN. Bradby, in particular, led the reporting of DD's conference speech. It bombed and it bombed badly he told the public (anh interpretation that still infuriates the Davis-ites). These two talking heads - and the production/editorial teams behind them - had big influences on this contest and will continue to be very big players in politics for the next few years (at least until the blogosphere really hits its potential heights).
***
PS Iain Dale, Chief of Staff to DD, has posted that camp's own awards results here.
I think Editor, you are being a bit unfair on the Times who became one of Camerons leading cheer leaders early on.Not perhaps suprising given that Gove & Finkelstein both write for it but at least they stuck their necks out.
These days though,TV journalists have more influence.
Posted by: malcolm | 06 December 2005 at 15:09
Fair comment, Malcolm, but the Tory electorate mainly read The Mail and The Telegraph.
Posted by: Editor | 06 December 2005 at 15:39
Newspapers don't break news any more, what they are is the only opportunity for any decent length analysis.
I think early on the Telegraph was excellent, especially its championing of New Localism. Its just once the election became out personalities there is little for newspapers to really get into.
Posted by: wasp | 06 December 2005 at 16:24
Nick Robinson now has a blog up at the BBCi news site:
link!
Posted by: James Hellyer | 06 December 2005 at 17:27
Great Post. I like it. Hope to see more excellent words from you.
Posted by: uggs clearance | 28 September 2011 at 07:51
I wish we both can do better in the future.It great honour if you can visit our website,and give us some suggession.
Posted by: uggs for cheap | 28 September 2011 at 08:09
All human actions have one or more of these seven causes: chance, nature, compulsions, habit, reason, passion, desire. Do you think so?
Posted by: cheap uggs for sale | 30 September 2011 at 09:38
Hi… How are you ? Really it’s a wonderfull video . I am studying english at the collage , but I don’t have a chance to speak with another persons. so when I watch this video , I UNDERSTOOD the idea . I said , I am not weak . really thanks . I wash to know people from US or UK to speak , to develope my language ….thanks for all..
Posted by: gucci outlet store | 30 September 2011 at 09:42
I think like with anything, perception tends to be reality
Given more time and understanding most people come around.
Nearshoring works, picking a country is like any other choice , do your homework, look at costs, determine your risk level (not crime but Gov't stability,skill level, educational system etc) and make a choice!
Most people only dip in a toe with a small project and soon learn if they made the right choice
Posted by: cheap uggs | 30 September 2011 at 09:46
Tannenbaum on the team's website (newyorkjets.com).Although contract terms were not announced, multiple local media sources reported the deal was worth $46 million for four years with $32 million guaranteed.
Posted by: cheap lululemon | 01 July 2013 at 12:20
354549488983ISBNЕAN8EAN13 of UPC baг code database
Posted by: reverse phone lookup | 27 December 2013 at 03:22
sunglаssestsuuhann.asia 12120894
Posted by: garcinia cambogia | 09 January 2014 at 16:15