David Willetts may have won Nick Gibb MP's endorsement at the weekend but news (in tonight's London's Evening Standard) that he has taken a £40,000 consultancy will cause some to doubt the seriousness of his leadership ambitions. David Cameron and Ken Clarke may be preparing to junk their outside financial interests but Mr Willetts has accepted a lucrative consultancy from Punter Southall & Co to give advice on pensions. Mr Willetts became one of Britain's leading authorities on the pensions industry when he held the pensions portfolio under William Hague, IDS and Michael Howard. He may be 'Two Brains' but DW does not appear to have a single-minded focus on winning the Tory crown.
DW's most significant contribution to the Tory leadership race was a speech to the Social Market Foundation early this summer. That speech inspired this reflection from one of conservatism's most thoughtful columnists - David Brooks. Mr Brooks, who writes twice a week for the New York Times, contributed the following words to a feature celebrating ten years of The Weekly Standard. The two Davids' words are worth quoting at length:
"The best description of conservatism's evolution comes from David Willetts, the Tory MP. He tells the tale as a personal journey, but it really applies to Anglo-Saxon conservatism as a whole:
"You start by making your own way in the world and what appeals to you above all is the language of flexibility, mobility, opportunity. It is the economically liberal bit which brings many people to Conservatism . . . .
"Then you get more tolerant as you begin to realize people don't always behave as you expect. You recognize how wide is the range of human motivation and how much knowledge and wisdom is dispersed. You see the market as one way in which all this diversity can be respected. Perhaps you become more tolerant and open-minded. That's the social liberalism.
"Then you have children and you start thinking about the environment in which they will grow up. You worry about how to transmit your values to the next generation. It can feel as if you are fighting a battle against not so much the state as an incredibly crude commercial culture that tells them there is no more to life but consumption. You begin to discover that there are deep ties and obligations across the generations. You notice that your friends who understand this best and live up to it are the ones with the most fulfilled and satisfied lives. In fact they are much more satisfied than the people who are just following the thin freedoms of mobility and choice."
The obvious thing Willetts is saying is that the Burke and Oakeshott side of conservatism is just as important as the libertarian, free market side, if not more so. This thought has obviously occurred to a lot of people all at once. (Read Rick Santorum's book, which treats the family, not the individual, as the basic unit of society.)
But the underlying point is that conservative writers are now spending a lot more time trying to understand the substratum of human behavior. Rather than treating human beings as economic actors and lauding the entrepreneur as conservatism's paragon, they are discussing the values, assumptions, and mental landscapes that are passed down unconsciously from generation to generation. Why do some groups succeed and others fail? Why are some people raised in environments that transmit one set of values while others are raised in environments that transmit another set of values? This is what Thomas Sowell, Charles Murray, Samuel Huntington, and even Bernard Lewis, in their different ways, have been writing about.
Everybody knew the complicated and politically treacherous subject of inherited group traits was always down there. Now it is pretty much unavoidable."
I think this is sad we need heavyweights like Willets devoting his energies full time to the Conservative party.
Posted by: malcolm | 12 September 2005 at 20:10
Ive not really considered him one of the major challengers for the Tory crown, when you see that Clarke, Davis, Cameron and arguably Rifkind were being mentioned before him. Maybe next time. Building up a profile through consultancy work is good for him, both in the political background sense and in the pocket.
Posted by: James Maskell | 12 September 2005 at 20:17
Libertarians get married and have families too. They are often religious and philanthropic. Willetts repeatedly uses this straw man argument. It a fig leaf to cover his own authoritarianism. He wants government (led by himself)to dictate how we live our lives.
Libertarians do not treat human beings as mere economic actors. Human beings are an end in themselves rather than cogs in a planned social system. That is why Charles Murray is a libertarian. He did after write the book "What it means to be a Libertarian". You should get a copy Editor.
Posted by: Selsdon Man | 12 September 2005 at 20:18
SM: Willetts is an authoritarian; he wants government to dictate how we live our lives; libertarians view humans as an end in themselves rather than cogs in a planned social system (which, we can infer, is how non-libertarians view them).
Straw man?
Posted by: Blimpish | 12 September 2005 at 21:29
Very sad Willetts is doing this. True, his hands haven't been entirely clean up to now in the matter of outside paid employment- which I think is inappropriate for all MPs (see http://www.theyworkforyou.com/mp/david_willetts/havant ). But this is a further step in the wrong direction.
It confirms his heart isn't in the leadership, and in the interests of the Party he should now withdraw.
Posted by: Wat Tyler | 12 September 2005 at 22:28
I have no problem with backbenchers having part-time consulting jobs - it keeps them in touch with the real world. It is, however, inappropriate for Shadow Ministers. That applies not Oliver Letwin too.
I agree Wat, he should withdraw from the leadership - but also resign from the Shadow Cabinet.
Posted by: Selsdon Man | 13 September 2005 at 08:56
A very quiet news day on the leadership front today obviously becuase most people, like myself, were making the most of England's famous victory. Couldn't help but chuckle at the Times' attempt to resurrect Cameron's candidacy. Including one of the weakest lines I have heard in an endorsement, that "we have had younger leaders and we have had posher leaders." Surely his team can do better than that?
Posted by: Disraeli | 13 September 2005 at 09:46
"We have had younger leaders and we have had posher leaders" - Hague and Douglas-Home, respectively? That would be the 2001 and the 1963 defeats?
Posted by: Blimpish | 13 September 2005 at 10:51
Don't be too hard on Tobias Ellwood, Disraeli. His endorsement statement (of Cameron) reflects his laid back style. Tobias is a good campaigner -increased the majority in Bournemouth East whereas it fell in Bournemouth West. Like many of the new intake, he is still settling in.
Posted by: Selsdon Man | 13 September 2005 at 11:34
Yes Disreali,what an amazing day yesterday was.The cricket was lead story on both news channels and David Gower was on Newsnight (along with the most pathetic MP I've ever seen- John Healey Lab).Sport really does seem to lift the mood of the nation more than it has ever done these days.The media seems to have realised this,will politicians?
Posted by: malcolm | 13 September 2005 at 12:04
Quite right Malcolm. I would really like to see the Conservative PArty grabbing the public mood and taking up the issue of cricket being removed from free to air television from next year - which, I think, risks jeopardising all of the steps forward we have made. The Lib Dems, needless to say, are already making hay out of this one.
Posted by: Disraeli | 13 September 2005 at 12:20
Disraeli - what right should Government have to interfere in the commercial affairs of private businesses? How would you replace the money that is going to develop young talent?
Leave the unprincipled bandwaggon jumping to the Lib Dems.
Posted by: Selsdon Man | 13 September 2005 at 13:03
Selsdon Man - I would normally agree with you. Nevertheless, Lord MAclaurin did make an undertaking to Chris Smith that the ECB would ensure that the majority of home test matches remained free to air. Youngsters are not going to want to play the game in such numbers if they do not see potentail heroes on free to air TV. Any money gained from TV rights is likely to be lost in advertising revenue etc if the exposure of test cricket is limited to such an extent. I do think that great national occasions such as home test matches, the Cup Final, the Derby etc should be available for all to see.
Posted by: Disraeli | 13 September 2005 at 13:41
Surely the ECB considered those issues before awarding the contract to BSkyB. Mclaurin is history so his verbal undertaking is worthless.
I still think that politicians and governments should not meddle in sport - and that includes subsidising sports stadia, organisations and the Olympics.
Posted by: Selsdon Man | 13 September 2005 at 14:08
I much more interested in government providing decent sporting facilities at school,ensuring there is enough time for serious sport at school,giving the Sports minister proper clout within government and also ensuring that our Sports minister is not a complete deadbeat as most governments over the last 25 years have done.
Posted by: malcolm | 13 September 2005 at 16:16
Sorry for the numerous typos in the above post,generally I'm not quite as inarticulate as this!
Posted by: malcolm | 13 September 2005 at 16:28
We should abolish the Department for Culture, Media and Sport. School sports should be handled by the Education Department. All state involvement in the arts should be abolished - including state subsidies of the arts. The BBC should turned into a subscription service, broken up and privatised.
Posted by: Selsdon Man | 14 September 2005 at 10:17
At least the pension industry likes Willetts if MPs don't!
Posted by: Selsdon Man | 15 September 2005 at 20:10
STORY: 'Jane By Design' Creator Addresses 'Devil Wears Prada' Comparisons
Posted by: prada outlet online | 10 August 2013 at 12:28
www.luchinis.com/
In the Xbox 360,the GPU had direct access to the CPU L2.and positive regulators of the cell cycle in a manner similar to that of the mammalian E2F1, of Bohemia, New York, a national distributor of electronic components for OEM !
Posted by: Bamcoappy | 30 September 2013 at 09:24
http://www.chanelem.com/
http://www.chanelem.com/includes/templates/chanelem/images/brand/right01.jpg
シャネル バッグ 新作
シャネル ブランド専門店【正規品質保証】シャネル ピアス 新作 2013、ドンキホーテ シャネル ピアス、シャネル ピアス 本物、シャネル ネックレス 新作、シャネル ネックレス 2013、シャネル ネックレス 人気 安値価格熱販!ぜひお見逃しなく
http://www.chanelem.com/シャネル 財布 レディース
Posted by: FigmaKign | 15 November 2013 at 10:18
http://www.bellinaestates.com/
http://www.bellinaestates.com/includes/templates/bellinaestates/images/brand/top05.jpg
ブランド 時計 店舗
ショッピングはニクソン 腕時計,ニクソン アウトレット,ニクソン 時計,NIXON時計の関連商品が探せる幅広い品ぞろえと、ニクソン 時計 人気,ニクソン 店舗,ニクソン 腕時計 レディース,ニクソン 腕時計 メンズ,ニクソン セール最新の お買い得ネット通販情報が満載
http://www.bellinaestates.com/セイコー メカニカル
Posted by: Attacriff | 20 November 2013 at 10:28