Mrs Andrew Marr makes the case for Ken Clarke

I haven't found a 'case for Ken Clarke' in any of Britain's daily right-of-centre newspapers although The Daily Mail, which backed him last time and shares his Michael Moore position on the Iraq war, may yet become a cheerleader and Peter Oborne endorsed him in last week's Speccie.  I've also failed to get the Clarke camp to provide an endorsement for this blog - all of the other leading camps have obliged.  This failure may be consistent with the Clarke camp's clear view that MPs should decide this contest.  Mr Clarke doesn't want to appeal to grassroots members and hopes that he won't have to.  Matthew d'Ancona notes that Mr Clarke is also unwilling to speak to journalists at a series of dinners that Tory donor Stuart Wheeler is hosting for the leadership candidates.  Mr d'Ancona writes:

"It is revealing that only Mr Clarke has declined [Mr Wheeler's] invitation. In the former chancellor's eyes, the normal positions have been reversed: Mr Clarke will put himself forward only if the Tory party proves itself a worthy candidate."

But if Mr Clarke is being battered by the likes of Mr d'Ancona, Ferdinand Mount, The Sun and Anatole Kaletsky he has got the backing of Jackie Ashley in today's Guardian. 

Ms Ashley believes that "the Conservatives could quite easily capitalise on a mood of tired irritation with Labour by the next election":

"For the first time in more than a decade, the economy might well be a point of weakness. Clarke, who was the last Tory chancellor and feels he built the foundations for the sustained growth Gordon Brown inherited, is the man to exploit that. He wants revenge and can at least talk the talk. Can you see the country turning to David Davis (or, indeed, David Cameron) and thinking "Ah yes, there's someone solid we can trust on the economy"? No, nor can I."

His economic reputation is, for Ms Ashley, the former Chancellor of the Exchequer's key asset.  "He is rightwing on economics," she writes - seemingly to reassure conspiratorial Conservatives anxious as to what her endorsement really means - and is "dismissive of the trade unions" - remember those ambulance workers? - and "contemptuous of big government".  Dismissive!  Contemptuous!  Wow!

Ken Clarke's other two big assets are his opposition to the Iraq war which "continues to look like the great foreign policy disaster of the Blair years" and his "authority based on personality and authenticity, experience and chutzpah".

Clarke's campaign has yet to take off.  Unlike David Cameron (Clarke's main rival to be DD's lead opponent) who has given half-a-dozen speeches and numerous interviews, KC has yet to give one big speech.  Last Friday's Telegraph only gave him two publicly-confirmed supporters - the odd couple of John Bercow and Ann Widdecombe (reminiscent, perhaps, of 1997's 'odd couple' Redwood-Clarke ticket).  He's certain to win more supporters as he puts a campaign team together.  Andrew Tyrie, David Curry and John Gummer will be core parliamentary supporters, for example, and Richard Chalk and Paul Baverstock may be his campaign strategists.

Real momentum could also be generated if Sir Malcolm Rifkind quits the dancefloor and endorses his former Major Cabinet colleague.  Andrew Lansley, who backed Clarke in '01, may endorse him, too.  That would certainly give the Clarke bid some life and publicity.

Ken Clarke's interview for that obscure central banking magazine has produced the most broadcast coverage of the leadership race so far.  Whatever else one thinks of KC he certainly remains 'box office'.

Comments

[Wat Tyler]

As a DD supporter, half of me thinks Ken should stay in the race. After all, he's likely to split the support for a leftish candidate possibly making things easier for Our Man. Which is presumably why DC is now trying to woo the party's right.

Sure he makes lots of noise, but Ken's hippo-like presence only always rocks the boat alarmingly. As a Europhile two-time loser, there's no way he's going to win (even if those anti-democratic MPs do get their way on the voting rules).

For once in his life he should think of the party, and withdraw. Leave us to concentrate on the real choice- ie DD or DC.

[wasp]

If DD really is as unpopular with MPs as many believe then the race Clarke should concern him with is beating Cameron to come second and watch the anti-DD bandwagon swing behind him. Or there could be a euro-inspired anti KC bandwagon giving the race to Clarke.

Would like to know what he really stands for though.

[Jonathan Sheppard]

Ms Ashley writes,

"Can you see the country turning to David Davis (or, indeed, David Cameron) and thinking "Ah yes, there's someone solid we can trust on the economy"? No, nor can I."

Well actually yes I can see that. We hear all these reports about what a great Chancellor our Gordon has been. Funny how he has to fudge the dates of his "economic cycle". There is a big black hole in the finances that will come back to bite him sooner or later. And lets not go into the issue of pensions.

So actually yes I could see the country trusting either Cameron or Davis - and I suspec teh economy may once again become a political background before the next election is upon us.

[Jonathan Sheppard]

Oops - and that should read electoral battleground.

Working in Nottingham means I am too busy seeing how the test match is going!

[Derek Tipp]

He's arrogant, out of touch and now he's even claimed to have ditched his long-held beliefs in the EU. He would be a disaster.

[houndtang]

Ken Clarke was the best option in 1997 and the second best option in 2001 but if he stands again he faces the possibility of humiliation a la Herbert Morrison in the 1955 Labour leadership election.

[William Norton]

If Ken Clarke is "arrogant", "out of touch" and has "ditched his long-held beliefs" as per Derek Tipp (2 posts above) that probably makes him favourite in an MPs-only ballot.

[carol]

I supported Clarke in 1997, voted for him in 2001 but wouldn't touch him with a bargepole now. He has done nothing to help the Party during the hard times, has been totally wrong about Europe and his time has passed. If he had been prepared to bend a little in 1997 he would have had the leadership for the asking but he was too arrogant to do so. Forget it Ken it is too late.

[Selsdon Man]

Clarke did not take a Michael Moore position on the Iraq War. He and Malcolm Rifkind based their position on their experience in Government. They have been proved right. Just think of all the votes that we lost (and seats we failed to win back) because our leadership believed the neo-conservative lies and backed the war.

[Vibram]

It's very lucky for us to meet an article like this.
A lot of thanks for all your valuable work on this article.

[Moncler outlet]

Your article is one of the most classical style, when I read once, I have been deeply in love with them, you look forward to more perfect work.

[juicy couture outlet]

I have read your article, I love them so much I will put your webpage is saved, they are really very good.

[Moncler]

This is my first time to your website, I send you the very distinctive, deserve me to treasure. Your article I learned a lot of things, thank you.

[cheap uggs]

Love is patient;love is kind; love is not envious or boastful or arrogant or rude.

[uggs outlet]

Awesome post! Wishing you the best of luck with your project!

[moncler jacken]

Too good too cool when I read it really benefit, thank you for publishing works so well, I expect you to continue publishing more good articles.

[Moncler online shop]

I am appreciate your blog, is really very good good super endless good good love love super love I expect your good blog continues to attract me love love love....

[Moncler outlet]

Recent articles. I think this is the most beautiful in the world the article, there must be many people like it your works will get everyone recognized you is the best I will always support you

[moncler jacken]

I have been keeping track of your site for a long time I read these articles, this is an interesting reading I will continue to pay attention to it more

[Moncler online shop]

Still miss your blog, I can say that they are the most worthy to see something, I will they treasured up they are my most rewarding that I would like to thank the author because of you, my life has become so colorful.

[Moncler outlet]

A feeling of your web site do too well beyond my imagination website content is very rich and I love reading each article I will slowly appreciate them

[moncler jacken]

Today is my first time here, I think your blog with new ideas, new information can make people have new feeling novel state, thank specially provided us with these readers very beautiful always keep you warm

[Moncler online shop]

I accept this point I think with your website said. It is the great creation after reading the impression is very deep theme and content are consistent with the mainstream of the times support support support

[Moncler outlet]

Excellent blog have a feeling I have deeply fallen in love with it 's simple and decent concise permanentToo good a very trend benefited from I want to thank the publisher it is because of you, my world is wonderful because of you, I become more substantial!

[Moncler online shop]

The commissioners, as they listened to this autobiography, must often have raised their eyes in wonder, on the venerable and dignified author before them.The report was most favourable