« Gay rights groups attack Tories for protecting right to make "temperate criticism" of homosexuality | Main | A Tory Government would consider capping Government IT contracts at £100 million »

Comments

Some misguided people believe that skin colour is of no consequence in matters relating to immigration.
Posted by: Franie | January 28, 2009 at 13:18


I don't have an issue with skin colours mingling Franie, and I have no desire to think this country only belongs to white people, It doesn't. The UK is without a doubt multi-racial already and will continue to be this way. The thing which does irk me, is the way my culture is being threatened. If I could go back to the days of my Angle ancestors then I'd be equally happy sitting around a camp fire with any number of mixed races, but I'd be unhappy with some if they wanted to kick water on my fire, rip the tent down and demand the right to spoil my camp.

'Colour' is neither here nor there but culture is everything for it defines who you are not what you are. Also, neither one of us are supreme. Supremacy is an idea which came from the Ark, not from Angles nor did it come from Angels.

Excellent post, rugfish - I hope you get "Comment of the Day" for this one - you deserve to!

"I'd be equally happy sitting around a camp fire with any number of mixed races, but I'd be unhappy with some if they wanted to kick water on my fire, rip the tent down and demand the right to spoil my camp."

I think most of us agree on this!

I also heartily second what you say about "supremacy".

"I don't have an issue with skin colours mingling Franie, .............." Rugfish.

For example are you an indigenous white man/woman of European origin or are you a black man/woman of African origin? Which? Therefore skin colour is a part of your racial makeup which cannot be denied regardless of how much you would wish that fact to be otherwise. Furthermore, were a white homeland to become overwhelmed by non-white immigration eventually that country would become almost exclusively non-white comprising a mixture of individual races including a sizeable element of micegenated examples.

If that didn't constitute a major demographic transformation resulting from the greater loss and destruction of the indigenous inhabitants' living space(s) and racial genome, then what would?

Are you saying this is acceptable? If you are then you would have to admit that must also be OK for let's say, Africans to be dispossessed of their ancestral living spaces and miscegenated out of existence by Arabs, white Europeans, Indians and Mongoloids.

If Africans would see fit to resist the attempted genocide of their race, does that make them black supremicists or does the supremicist tag only apply to indigenous white Europeans when it's they who are resisting this very same attempted genocide? Well!

What Lefties also refuse to recognise and admit, is that if a race is extinguised in its own living space(s), its heritage culture, traditions and language will cease to prosper and eventually die out in its former living space(s) too.

Hello everyone. I need your help.
I am from Belize and know bad English, give true I wrote the following sentence: "Dealers at the markets click stalls in the menu, to list or search flea vendors.Observe your pet closely after using flea products."

Thank you very much :D. Kenyon.

The comments to this entry are closed.

#####here####

Categories

ConHome on Twitter

    follow me on Twitter

    Conservative blogs

    Today's public spending saving

    New on other blogs

    • Receive our daily email
      Enter your details below:
      Name:
      Email:
      Subscribe    
      Unsubscribe 

    • Tracker 2
    • Extreme Tracker