A week ago we wondered if David Davis would struggle to keep his campaign in the news. Thanks to Culture Minister Andy Burnham we needn't have worried. Mr Burnham is having to back pedal furiously after Liberty's Shami Chakrabarti threatened to sue him for talking about "late night, hand-wringing, heart-melting phone calls" with Mr Davis. In a letter to Mr Burnham, that the Evening Standard's Paul Waugh has published, she writes:
"By your comments you debase not only a great office of state but the vital debate about fundamental rights and freedoms in this country. Indeed you seem reluctant to engage in that debate except in this tawdry fashion. I look forward to your written apology as I'm sure does Mrs Davis. If on the other hand you choose to continue down the path of innuendo and attempted character assassination, you will find that the privileged legal protection of the parliament chamber does not extend to slurs made in the wider public domain."
Two Tory women MPs and the LibDems' Lynne Featherstone have joined the protests against Mr Burnham's remarks:
Justine Greening; "Shami has worked with MPs of all parties to raise the concerns she has. She is completely driven but incredibly professional."
Lynne Featherstone, Liberal Democrat Equalities spokeswoman, says: "Shami's fight for civil liberties is unimpeachable. Any many who thinks that it is okay to speak like that and claim it is political knock-about clearly hasn't understood the women's movement."
Shadow Justice minister Eleanor Laing says: "This sinks politics to a new low. If David Davis had had late-night talks with a man that would have been seen as part of the old-boys network but as soon as a woman is involved, there is this appalling innuendo."
Oh God, Shami Chakrabarti is back on her high horse.
Posted by: Alexander King | June 19, 2008 at 16:27
So DD might be having an affair with Shami, he might not be having an affair with Shami...frankly does anyone apart from Mrs D really care?
Posted by: Aurora Borealis | June 19, 2008 at 16:34
Alexander, how dreadful, a woman speaks up in defence of her reputation, my word, we'll be wanting the vote next!
Posted by: sjm | June 19, 2008 at 16:36
What does Harman think?
Surely she wouldn't miss an opportunity to comment on a womens rights issue.....
Posted by: Oberon Houston | June 19, 2008 at 16:39
Bingo!
Alexander King misses the point again
Speak out against this wretched government and they will trash you, that's unacceptable and we should defend all who are picked on in this way.
Posted by: Treacle | June 19, 2008 at 16:40
Andy Burnham might have thought he was being funny and lighthearted, but I think he went a bit too far.
Having a go at David Davis is one thing, but to imply what he was implying was entirely different - and wrong.
Posted by: Walter West | June 19, 2008 at 16:47
So, in Shami Chakrabarti's world, the law should be protecting the right of to roam the streets freely and stopping individuals from making statements that may or may not be true? To threaten to sue over that comment is utterly pathetic.
Posted by: Sam Bowman | June 19, 2008 at 16:47
labour MP Diane Abbott has condemned Burnham too. So it's all-party.
Posted by: Louise Bagshawe | June 19, 2008 at 16:49
Andy Burnham is just having a laugh. I find his comments hilarious. And frankly, they needed saying. We've heard enough of Chakrabarti's pious lecturing to last us a decade.
If Shami Chakrabarti can't handle the rough and tumble of public life, then she shouldn't be in public life.
Well done, Andy Burnham, for puncturing her self-regarding bubble.
Posted by: Alexander King | June 19, 2008 at 16:50
There is a difference between 'puncturing her self-regarding bubble' and making wild allegations to smear someone.
Posted by: Walter West | June 19, 2008 at 16:52
Shami's just getting paranoid.
On 2nd October last year the Telegraph did a round up of the most influential people on the right. It contained the following paragraph re Chakrabarti and it is only gossipy if you have a suspicious frame of mind.
“She, more than anyone, has influenced Conservative civil liberties policies. If there’s a Home Office you can be sure her advice will be sought by both David Davis and Nick Clegg. She is a huge influence on Davis in particular.”
She never complained about that, did she?
She just needs a thicker skin.
Posted by: Bob Grant | June 19, 2008 at 16:55
Frankly, David Davis would be mad to go there anyway.
PART OF COMMENT OVERWRITTEN.
Posted by: Alexander King | June 19, 2008 at 16:57
Burnham did voice a common worry about how close those two are - he seems to be in her pocket politically. Liberty have often been on the wrong side of security issues.
Posted by: Ay up | June 19, 2008 at 16:58
If he had said "David Davis has joined Shami Chakrabati in being on the wrong side of the security argument" that would have been fine. I wouldn't have agreed with him, because I tend to think that Liberty are right more often than the government but it would have been 'fair comment'.
Implying that they are having an affair is just not on - or fair.
Posted by: Walter West | June 19, 2008 at 17:00
Oh come off it, Alexander King - she is an attractive woman - or do you believe a woman is only attractive if she resembles Jessica Rabbit?!
Posted by: Sally Roberts | June 19, 2008 at 17:01
Methinks Ms C has had a sense of humour failure. Anyone with half a brain can see the comment was meant in jest. Strike her off the dinner party guest list, she'd be rubbish at banter.
Posted by: RichardJ | June 19, 2008 at 17:06
Its a sign of how willing this government are to smear people who disagree with them. Their first attack on David Davis implied a nasty streak of homophobia, now this. I don't blame Shami Chakrabarti for threatening legal action. Defending free speech does not preclude objecting to potentially slanderous comments.
Posted by: Louise | June 19, 2008 at 17:09
So much for Liberty Shami..... Hows about protecting free speech!!!
Posted by: Imogen Brodie | June 19, 2008 at 17:14
I agree with imogen. I'm unimpressed with Shami's rush to the courts.
Posted by: Jennifer Wells | June 19, 2008 at 17:16
The comments to this entry are closed.