« People in Northern Ireland want a Conservative government | Main | Why should others write Conservative history? »

Comments

Oh God, Shami Chakrabarti is back on her high horse.

So DD might be having an affair with Shami, he might not be having an affair with Shami...frankly does anyone apart from Mrs D really care?

Alexander, how dreadful, a woman speaks up in defence of her reputation, my word, we'll be wanting the vote next!

What does Harman think?

Surely she wouldn't miss an opportunity to comment on a womens rights issue.....

Bingo!

Alexander King misses the point again

Speak out against this wretched government and they will trash you, that's unacceptable and we should defend all who are picked on in this way.

Andy Burnham might have thought he was being funny and lighthearted, but I think he went a bit too far.

Having a go at David Davis is one thing, but to imply what he was implying was entirely different - and wrong.

So, in Shami Chakrabarti's world, the law should be protecting the right of to roam the streets freely and stopping individuals from making statements that may or may not be true? To threaten to sue over that comment is utterly pathetic.

labour MP Diane Abbott has condemned Burnham too. So it's all-party.

Andy Burnham is just having a laugh. I find his comments hilarious. And frankly, they needed saying. We've heard enough of Chakrabarti's pious lecturing to last us a decade.

If Shami Chakrabarti can't handle the rough and tumble of public life, then she shouldn't be in public life.

Well done, Andy Burnham, for puncturing her self-regarding bubble.

There is a difference between 'puncturing her self-regarding bubble' and making wild allegations to smear someone.

Shami's just getting paranoid.
On 2nd October last year the Telegraph did a round up of the most influential people on the right. It contained the following paragraph re Chakrabarti and it is only gossipy if you have a suspicious frame of mind.

“She, more than anyone, has influenced Conservative civil liberties policies. If there’s a Home Office you can be sure her advice will be sought by both David Davis and Nick Clegg. She is a huge influence on Davis in particular.”

She never complained about that, did she?
She just needs a thicker skin.

Frankly, David Davis would be mad to go there anyway.

PART OF COMMENT OVERWRITTEN.

Burnham did voice a common worry about how close those two are - he seems to be in her pocket politically. Liberty have often been on the wrong side of security issues.

If he had said "David Davis has joined Shami Chakrabati in being on the wrong side of the security argument" that would have been fine. I wouldn't have agreed with him, because I tend to think that Liberty are right more often than the government but it would have been 'fair comment'.
Implying that they are having an affair is just not on - or fair.

Oh come off it, Alexander King - she is an attractive woman - or do you believe a woman is only attractive if she resembles Jessica Rabbit?!

Methinks Ms C has had a sense of humour failure. Anyone with half a brain can see the comment was meant in jest. Strike her off the dinner party guest list, she'd be rubbish at banter.

Its a sign of how willing this government are to smear people who disagree with them. Their first attack on David Davis implied a nasty streak of homophobia, now this. I don't blame Shami Chakrabarti for threatening legal action. Defending free speech does not preclude objecting to potentially slanderous comments.

So much for Liberty Shami..... Hows about protecting free speech!!!

I agree with imogen. I'm unimpressed with Shami's rush to the courts.

The comments to this entry are closed.

#####here####

Categories

ConHome on Twitter

    follow me on Twitter

    Conservative blogs

    Today's public spending saving

    New on other blogs

    • Receive our daily email
      Enter your details below:
      Name:
      Email:
      Subscribe    
      Unsubscribe 

    • Tracker 2
    • Extreme Tracker