« Is it time for fixed-term parliaments? | Main | Ten quick observations from day two »

Comments

I'd be far more interested if the Human Rights issues were aimed more at the victims of crime at home rather than the victims abroad. Too many times has the Human Rights Act been used to shield criminals from their actions and prevent justice. If the Tories were to promise to amend this, then you might, just might get my vote. Throw in a proper English Parliament in a Federal UK then you'll not just get my vote but all the members of my family too.

The truth is that many, many of these situations can't be dealt with because they are not in China or Russia's interest. I think if we (By we I really mean all Liberal Democracies, Britain on its own is not enough even if we punch above our weight) are truly going to do something for human rights violations across the world then we have to use our collective economic muscle to persuade China and Russia that it is in their interests to improve human rights in their own and their satellite states.

>I'd be far more interested if the Human Rights issues were aimed more at the victims of crime at home rather than the victims abroad. Too many times has the Human Rights Act been used to shield criminals from their actions and prevent justice.

Eh? What are you going on about?

The story is about people being tortured and burnt alive, and you are going on about criminals in the UK?

Do you not care about genocide, something which can be stopped?

Realpolitik will always trump any consideration of human rights when it comes to foreign policy. Oppositions have the luxery to take the moral high ground but when the business of government arrives real choices have to made and sadly in many cases true human rights, those of the dignity of the human person are pushed to one side. As conservatives we should not fool ourseves nor the British people.

Not sure that Hague would have done any more than Brown has in Burma, seeing as our armed forces are already approaching breaking point, but it's good to see him setting his stall out so clearly.

http://lettersfromatory.wordpress.com/2007/10/02/sit-back-and-enjoy-the-carnage/

Surely national interest should be at the heart of british foreign policy?

Do as I say not as I do.

Our record in the West from Abu Ghraib, Guantanamo Bay, through Rendition and the fabricated basis for the invasion of Iraq hardly provides a morally strong position from which to lecture others. The inexcusable vacillation over Darfur further reinforces our collective moral failure and the view that the West only intervenes when our interests are directly threatened.

The message should be that Gordon Brown and New Labour are part of the problem and that Cameron's Conservative party is part of the solution. We have the high ground and should stake our claim.

Gordon Brown is currently in Baghdad trying to milk some electoral advantage from the 'bringing our boys home routine' and we should be saying, repeatedly and loudly, that he put them there in the first place. On his head be it.

And here's an idea if we are balancing tax cuts with ethically motivated tax hikes:

The Conservative government will withdraw our armed forces from Iraq and will invest the same money that it costs to keep combat troops in theatre in the infrastructure of Basra and Southern Iraq. We will do, in other words, the right thing.


Why should Britain bear the cost of fighting for human rights when our economic competitors like China and India refuse to do like wise?

I am staggered by the pathetic, nasty, tiny-mindedness of some of commenters on this site. They are a disgrace to the Conservative Party -- assuming they aren't UKIP trolls.

I'm so pleased that there is now an emphasis on human rights. Perhaps we'll a bit more about our human rights obligation to look after those seeking asylum from such areas, and a bit less about how they are "stealing our houses."

Our record in the West from Abu Ghraib, Guantanamo Bay, through Rendition and the fabricated basis for the invasion of Iraq hardly provides a morally strong position from which to lecture others.

Exactly. Anyway all this handwringing will achieve nothing. With China and Russia calling many of the shots these days it is unlikely that a Conservative government could achieve anything more than is being done at present by Brown and co.

No doubt some of these tyrannies will run out of steam in due course. Mugabe cannot be much longer for this world. When he pops his clogs there is a good chance that Zimbabwe can return to something like normality.

Always remember that in the vast majority of cases dictatorships, tyrannical monarchies etc come to grief when the rulers show signs of weakness, conscience or both.

In the case of Burma I would say there is not the slightest chance of that happening in the forseeable future.

I think British conservatives should look at the Maldives webstes, lke Good governor, and then you will realise, how much the Maldivian hate your intrusion in the Maldives, with your affliation to this terror group, who since its formation is abusing the human rights of maldivian citizen by engaging in violence, creating lawlessness in our country.you are hated, and you should abondon the partnership you have with this violent movement. this is unethical, you can contribute to humanrights by stopping your support to this group. you are losing your credibility among people because of this liason.

Thakur, assuming you are referring to the MDP, I'd like to say how delighted I am that this article has got your attention - only someone in league with the government could assert that it is they who are abusing human rights!

I was in exile at the time the Conservatives were setting up their HRU. I also was fortunate enough to meet Rt. Hon. Liam Fox, who very kindly arranged for us to meet Rt. Hon. Garry Streeter. Our visit was in connection with the human rights situation in my country.

When it comes to helping another human being, one must have the strength to overcome prejudice and pettiness, I think.
The Conservatives care. And, they have a plan. After returning home from exile, and after witnessing the deteriorating situation that culminated in a bomb incident, I must admit that your efforts now must be doubled. If there is hope, there is always a way.

Abusing a human being anywhere on earth, is a crime. Anyone can prevent it. For a political party it is easier.

The people of the Maldives have clearly benefited from the importance the UK and its EU partners have placed on human rights. When I was in government, I was deeply encouraged by the support the government received from the UK, whether through High Commmissioner Chilcott or the Chairman of the All Party Group,the Lord Naseby or indeed from the Conservative Party Human Rights Commission in acceding to international human rights treaties. While I recognise that accession is only the first step, the wide range of pro-human rights measures taken on my watch would not have been possible without the support of our international stakeholders. Needless to say, I am very happy to read that human rights promotion remains at the heart of the Conservative Party's foreign policy. It should be the case for all parties and all countries.

We have NO human rights in Maldives. Its all what you see on the face of Maldives. The paradsie the heaven , the little paradise in the Indian ocean, all fake.... If any of you come to Maldives and see by your self and see how the people live under the umberall of Mr. Gayoom. How he treats the people ... Its all fake and nothing true in Maldives

in maldives we have more human rights than that u have in UK, we have full freedom of speach which u dont have,

The comments to this entry are closed.

#####here####

Categories

ConHome on Twitter

    follow me on Twitter

    Conservative blogs

    Today's public spending saving

    New on other blogs

    • Receive our daily email
      Enter your details below:
      Name:
      Email:
      Subscribe    
      Unsubscribe 

    • Tracker 2
    • Extreme Tracker