3pm: David Cameron's webcameron review of PMQs:
2pm: ToryRadio's podcast of PMQs
Not verbatim
Editor's verdict: Another solid win for David Cameron. On the NHS and Europe, Brown appeared evasive. Whereas Cameron was able to think on his feet (ie when he responded with 'People will look at Brown and think of a man who breaks his promises') Brown kept repeating the same lines. He repeated the Tories will leave a £6bn blackhole in the nation's finances line far too many times. Whereas in the summer he built up a (false) reputation as above politics the PM is not behaving like a PM but a partisan fighter at every opportunity. His trashing of his own brand continues.
12.28pm: Henry Bellingham highlights the fact that there have been a record 400,000 calls to the service family's helpline. Why won't he honour the military covenant?
12.25pm: Michael Fabricant asks a question about troops coming home from Iraq. The third Tory to ask a defence-related question.
12.15pm: Vince Cable asks if PM agrees with Andy Burnham's claim that the tax system should recognise marriage. Brown responds by paying tribute to Ming Campbell and making a joke that if things carry on like this all LibDem MPs will have a chance of being leader during this Parliament. Brown says marriage was recognised by Labour in last week's IHT announcement but that Labour policy will always support all children - not just some.
12.13pm: Cameron quickly comes back and says: People will look at Brown and think of a man who breaks his promises. If he doesn't grant a referendum they'll know that his word can't be trusted.
12.12pm: Cameron quotes Labour's Gisela Stuart who says that the red lines are red herrings. Brown quotes Ken Clarke back and his suggestion that a referendum would be "dotty". Failing to break through the jeers from his accusation that Cameron used too many soundbites, he makes a flat joke about Cameron's suggestion that when people look at him they should think of Arnold Schwarzenegger.
12.11pm: Brown responds by saying that the Tories didn't grant a vote on the far more important Treaty of Maastricht. William Hague (he mistakenly calls him "Foreign Secretary", he said, denied the British people a vote. He then talks about his red lines.
12.10pm: Cameron's fourth question turns to Brown's EU Treaty referendum promise. Why won't he grant a referendum?
12.09pm: Brown: Tories have £6bn hole in the nation's finances. They will cut the NHS. [Yawn].
12.08pm: Cameron: Bureaucracy is hampering the war on superbugs. The nurse of the year is quitting. MRSA is up. When will he start listening to the NHS?
[The Speaker ticks off Ian Austin, Brown's PPS for barracking Cameron! Naughty, naughty.]
12.05pm: David Cameron says that Mr Brown hasn't read the report properly. Most hospitals, he says, are saying that targets are getting in the way of attempts to counter hospital infections. He quotes the NAO in support. Gordon Brown responds by attacking David Cameron for opposing Government investment in the NHS.
12.03pm: David Cameron asks the PM if Brown's top-down targets are frustrating the attempt to tackle hospital superbugs. The PM responds by saying that targets are an inevitable component of a modern healthcare system. He quotes the Healthcare Commission in support.
Noon: Graham Brady MP asks about the growing tax burden on small businesses.
Until then you can relive the roar'n'rage of last week's PMQs by watching this highlights video.
Should be very interesting, with Vince Cable in his first PMQs shootout. Cameron will ask a few at least about the EU Treaty. They WILL hurt Brown. Miliband made some cracking mistakes a week or so ago on the issue, being torn apart by Heathcote-Amory in Foreign Affairs Committee. I look forward to reading the minutes of his latest evidence session.
Posted by: James Maskell | October 17, 2007 at 10:28
Gordon Brown really ought to have said targets are for public consumption.
Posted by: Tony Makara | October 17, 2007 at 12:07
When people look at Brown they think of a clucking cowardly chicken. A man who is scared to face the British people in a general election or a referendum.
Posted by: Tony Makara | October 17, 2007 at 12:20
Another DC win! Labour's constant barracking makes them look desperate- and makes Broon look even worse ( if he needs THAT amount of 'help' from the benches- oh dear). DC looks more distinguished than Broon at the moment- and by eck- a Jock wishing the England rugby team well. Needless to say, if the Jocks were doing well the sentiment there would be- 'what the f'k has it got to do with anybody from England?!?' Vince 'the Undertaker' Cable did ok, but who was that grinning numpty sitting behind him- what a prune!
Posted by: simon | October 17, 2007 at 12:26
Brown must have been quite nervous, his stutter was back again.
Posted by: westbromblogger | October 17, 2007 at 12:28
Brown's attempt at humour was shocking. He's no Tony Blair. Looking at that syrup in the photo is far funnier.
Where's this £6 billion figure come from. Plucked ut of the air I expect.
Posted by: Andrew Woodman | October 17, 2007 at 12:29
Where's he getting this 6 billion black hole nonesense from? That seems to be his answer to everything today so presumably it's the latest NL cunning plan!
Posted by: ArthurWaik | October 17, 2007 at 12:32
If the Conservative Party had offered referendums on the SEA and TEU then I wouldn't mind Cameron asking questions on a referendum on the reform treaty. Why does the party insist on going on about this? It puts people off. Cameron should have answered Brown's question about keeping up the investment in the NHS as well as dropping pointless targets and giving the powers to the professionals.
Posted by: Cleo | October 17, 2007 at 12:33
pretty uninspiring stuff all round. DC wasn't great, but then neither was GB. Always a let-down after a cracking one previously. It's a good job no-one really cares what happens in it...
Posted by: powellite | October 17, 2007 at 12:41
The government is ripe for attack over the NHS dentistry scandal. I feel this issue is one in which Labour are very vunerable. Labour don't care either, the LabourHome website was cracking jokes about the lack of NHS dentists, even implying that the whole thing was just a myth.
Posted by: Tony Makara | October 17, 2007 at 12:44
You're absolutely right Cleo,as all the polls in the press have shown nobody at all wants a referendum. Cameron was very stupid to mention it . Equally stupid were Gisela Stewart (Labour MP who sat on the original Constitutional Commitee) and Michael Connarty (chairman of Parliamentary commitee on the EU) who foolishly believe that the 'red lines' are not worth the paper they're written on.
Posted by: Malcolm Dunn | October 17, 2007 at 12:50
"Cameron should have answered Brown's question about keeping up the investment in the NHS as well as dropping pointless targets and giving the powers to the professionals."
Cleo, this Prime Minister's questions, not leader of the opposition's questions.
Also I would point out that by addressing both the NHS and the EU David Cameron is sticking to the "And Theory" of balanced conservatism- a directon that is proving quite popular.
Posted by: MrB | October 17, 2007 at 12:51
Someone do us all a favour and pass Trumper's number to Fabricant. And yes, another good day for DC.
Posted by: Prodicus | October 17, 2007 at 12:55
I thought it was an easy Brown win.
He was good today and made Cameron look a bit flim-flammy. He had a counter-quote for everything Cameron said.
Posted by: Mike A | October 17, 2007 at 12:55
I wish a Tory MP would answer the accusation that Cleo makes about the SEA and TEU above 12:33.
Cleo, my understanding; the reason the party keeps going on about a referendum is that basically, Tony Blair killed the debate on the constitution (which is more than 90% the same as the new treaty) during the last election by promising a referendum. Using a crafty slight of hand Brown and his team believe they can get out of this PROMISE.
Posted by: a-tracy | October 17, 2007 at 12:57
Someone really should take Brown aside and tell him that he's not funny. Even with jokes that are written down for him he just cannot pull them off. It wasn't quite the mauling of last week, but Brown still looks rattled, nervous and almost frustrated by his own mediocre ability at the dispatch box.
Posted by: David | October 17, 2007 at 12:57
Another Cameron win. The Editor is spot on. Cameron made Brown look a weak man once again who can't be trusted.
A very deliberate tactic but one which I think will pay off, especially when Brown appears so desperate that he has to pluck figures from the air to claim we have a £6 billion whole in our plans.
Where on earth did he get this figure from?
This really smacks of desperation, I know I have said this, but it reminds me of the Non Doms argument, where the truth was the Government doesn't have the first idea.
It was another good PMQs.
I also need to ask for forgiveness as I felt a little sorry for the Lib Dems, but then I was always against cruelty on dumb animals.
Can't wait to next week.
Posted by: Ali T | October 17, 2007 at 13:00
Brown's attempts at humour are always going to fall flat. He has a lack of easy charm and a "killer" smile.
He has fallen back on Blair's tactic of trying to laugh off attacks but he does not have the where-with-all. One significant difference is that Blair was able to project a positive future when he rolled off the stats, but Brown always seems bogged down with the past.
I think the Labour Party benches will be relieved is wasn't last weeks car crash but the underlying weaknesses are still there. He is stuttering and not quite in control. When they fall back on Black Wednesday, you know the cupboard is bare. He doesn't seem to realise the public mood has changed and "investment" is not the magic word it once was.
Brown tried confident and cool today but D.C. did it better.
He tink D.C. eased
Posted by: Northernhousewife | October 17, 2007 at 13:03
Cleo for heavens sake the question about the referendum is about trust and speaks very much to, undermine the very character of Gordon Brown.This is crucial and it does not put people off at all-why do you think it does ? please quote your evidence!!
Posted by: Martin Bristow | October 17, 2007 at 13:05
It's strange that the Liberal leader (whoever it is at the time) always struggles to be heard above the noise of the chamber, but when Dennis Skinner gets up to make a pathetically partisan point, the house goes near silent in reverence. Can I ask that our side be a bit less respectful to this unpleasant dinosaur and give him the jeering he deserves.
Posted by: Rob | October 17, 2007 at 13:07
I lost count of the number of times he verbally stumbled when trying to start his point, "I, I, I, I..."
It really makes you look back at the cool, calm and collected Tony Blair with an annoying amount of admiration for his skill.
Beating the very contentious £6 billion drum will not get Brown very far in the eyes of the public, nor will him accusing Cameron of liking lots of soundbytes!
Posted by: Letters From A Tory | October 17, 2007 at 13:16
"Where's this £6 billion figure come from. Plucked ut of the air I expect."
From the over payments of the Tax Credit system, only Brown forgot he created the Tax Credit system.
Posted by: Iain | October 17, 2007 at 13:24
Ben Brogan's calling PMQ's today as a score draw!
Posted by: Adam | October 17, 2007 at 13:27
I suspect the £6 billion figure will be dropped next week, in favour of the £7 billion black hole.
Seems to me like Brown has got Blair's scriptwriters back on the case.
Posted by: David Morris | October 17, 2007 at 13:35
"I thought it was an easy Brown win."
You've got to be kidding, or else you are an New Labour toady. Brown stuttered, gibbered, and he bombed with the jokes he tried, he called the Shadow Foreign Secretary the Foreign Secretary, he said he was trying to correct the problems of his and his own Governments actions, and retreated to making spurious claims about black holes in Conservative tax plans, which is a really tedious line of attack.
Posted by: Iain | October 17, 2007 at 13:36
There is no way this was a Cameron win. Brown has opened up clear strategic lines of attack - £6bn black hole, no commitment to investment, PR over substance - and although his delivery is poor, he is in a strategically commanding position for the long term. Some day soon the leadership will realise that you can get so far on tactics - but strategy is what wins elections.
Posted by: John Scott | October 17, 2007 at 13:44
"I think the Labour Party benches will be relieved is wasn't last weeks car crash "
Northernhousewife, I think it was clear the Labour backbenches were instructed to make as much noise as they could to support the floundering Brown, but even though it came over contrived, and was deflated by Cameron pointing out it was Brown's PPS who was doing the shouting, it wasn't that much noise in light of the probable instructions there were under, and the failure of Brown last week.
Posted by: Iain | October 17, 2007 at 13:45
Rob, you are entitled not to like Dennis Skinner. He is, however, an energetic constituency MP (I've had occasion to deal with him, so this is first hand personal knowledge) and rather more interesting than his public image might have led you to believe.
Posted by: antifrank | October 17, 2007 at 13:52
"Score draw" is what the Beeb said on the lunchtime news. The Daily Politics gave it as a Cameron Win on points.
Posted by: Northernhousewife | October 17, 2007 at 13:52
Talking of score draws, what shirt will Mr Brown be wearing this Saturday if he bothers to attend this time?
Andrew O'Hagan, in the newspaper formerly known as the Torygraph, has it:
'Like me, he will want England to beat South Africa — and not only because South Africa has an even greater history of obnoxiousness than England — but in his heart the celebrations will pain him.'
Did I really just read that in the Telegraph? Yes. I did.
Regards,
A person whose nationality is more repellent than the former apartheid regime.
Posted by: englandism | October 17, 2007 at 13:55
I agree that today's PMQs were a clear win for Cameron and Brown bombed. (embarrassingly so - he really does make one appreciate Blair's skill). I think Cameron's approach was carefully measured to avoid any more charges of 'punch and judy'. Last week some press toady's (including Platell and Oborne) attacked him for being too aggressive. No-one could make that accusation today. Even so Cameron's points still hit home, and Brown was still floundering.
Posted by: Oscar Miller | October 17, 2007 at 14:24
The £6B black hole is unfounded. He is dragging this out of the spin that nuLab civil servants came up with during our conference, which a reputable economic institution found to be completely wrong. He is adopting the old adage repeat a lie frequently enough and loud enough and people will start to believe you.
Posted by: Bexie | October 17, 2007 at 14:41
Cameron and the conservatives must now consider a long term strategy. Cameron's 'If he wants to ask me a question call an election' came across as very weak.
Remind the Prime Minister (as Haigh did with so much humour) that it is his job to ASK questions and Brown's job to answer them!
I agree with the point about Skinner. This champagne socialist should be shouted down as soon as the idiot stands up.
The Conservatives should also do what the Labour Party do and organise their members to ask planted questions, all on a similar theme for that week!
Brown is only happy when he is talking figures. He should be asked time and again about the National Debt he has created.
The question of Brown's trust is one that all Conservatives should craft into their questions. The Labour Party have proved that by repeating and repeating a lie (£6M blackhole is the latest) people will believe it. So keep on and on and on about his untrustworthiness.
Now is the time for all Conservative MP's to fight dirty.
Posted by: alan | October 17, 2007 at 15:01
I missed it, but cannot agree that less Punch and Judy is the way to go. Up here on Tyneside, people who I spoke to were much more impressed with Cameron last week than they had been for some time. Perhaps it was because of the extra passion and aggression.
Posted by: Curly | October 17, 2007 at 15:02
"If the Conservative Party had offered referendums on the SEA and TEU then I wouldn't mind Cameron asking questions on a referendum on the reform treaty."
If the Conservative Party had made a manifesto commitment to hold referenda on those treaties, then you would have a point.
Posted by: Ash Faulkner | October 17, 2007 at 15:03
£6bn black hole... what a farce! Looking back over all Brown's budgets how many times has he had to adjust his borrowing figures upwards by well in excess of £6bn? In Brownian economics £6bn is a rounding error, or 1 IT project cost overrun, or the amount wasted in benefit overpayment and fraud.
Posted by: Mike Christie | October 17, 2007 at 15:11
Instead of worrying about Labour's tired old spin about some non-existent £6 billion black-hole.
Shouldn't we be asking how it is that the Government has allowed a £4billion black hole in its public spending plans for 2008 and further blackholes in the public spending plans in future years (totalling £12 or £16 billion)?
My understanding is that our public borrowing now is close to that of the USA (£35 billion?). As the USA is 5 times bigger in population terms how can this be?
It's about time we hammer Brown on his profligacy. He is borrowing hand over fist and we are not getting any benefit from it.
On another point I think DC has won PMQ's again. The media seem to be focussing on the EU Treaty and the trust issue again.
Posted by: John Leonard | October 17, 2007 at 15:34
Cameron's attack concerning the referendum would have been a thousand times more effective if Brown had not had Ken Clarke's bon mots to fall back on. Is it too much to hope that Clarke, who holds a position as Chairman of the Democracy Commission, might care to toe the Party line on this matter or at least shut up?
Posted by: The Huntsman | October 17, 2007 at 16:09
I suggest an organised fundraising event based the question of what the "Black Hole" will be at the next P.M.Qs - a bit like "Name the Teddy" or "Guess the number of sweeties in the jar".
I'd like to pencil myself in for £9 billio -as a guess, not a financial pledge.
Posted by: Northernhousewife | October 17, 2007 at 16:09
I think it's time we attacked Brown's borrowing, black holes and cycle shifting at PMQ's and attack this £6 billion black hole statment (which I presume is their £3 billion IHT cost doubled)
Posted by: Andrew Woodman | October 17, 2007 at 16:38
Cameron on Europe again? This is getting boring. There are so many other issues the public are concerned about like mass migration the lack of NHS dentists etc. I hope he doesn't touch on Europe again next week.
Posted by: 601 | October 17, 2007 at 18:25
The Sun and The Times and The Telegraph are not bored with Europe and even if they were, it is a serious issue for Britain and this is a critical time. It is also an embarrassing issue for Brown.
I think they are reasons a plenty no.601
Posted by: Northernhousewife | October 17, 2007 at 18:48
Is ITV news Libby Wiener (sp?) a known New Labour bumlicker? Her report on PMQ's and hospital acquired infections has left me gobsmacked. She said that David Cameron had made 'strong allegations', and that there was alot of 'politics' around, but the Government would see this as a 'health issue'. Perhaps someone should politely inform her that the Government RUNS the Health Service. She then made a comment to the effect that the Tories could be seen as equally to blame because they privatised hospital cleaning services when they were in power. Only one problem with that deary; they havent BEEN in power FOR 10 YEARS. Even Gordon Brown wasn't desperate/stupid enough to make that stunning observation during PMQ's. Bloody Cretin.
Posted by: Simon R | October 17, 2007 at 18:56
One more thing, is Fabricant wearing that thing on his head as a joke or some kind of ironic statement? He surely can't believe it resembles actual hair in any way.
Posted by: Simon R | October 17, 2007 at 19:00
Simon R: it's artificially fabricanted.
A bit like the supposed £4bn black hole that Brown claims to have found.
Posted by: Londoner | October 17, 2007 at 19:32
£6bn Londoner!
Posted by: CCHQ Spy | October 17, 2007 at 19:40
Gordon Brown claimed in PMQs that targets had led to a decline in deaths from heart disease.
I have put up on my blog a link to the statistics that show that the current trend in cardiac deaths started in the 1970s, and the relevant graphs show absolutely no effect of the Labour government on trends. How can he get away with saying that?
Posted by: Rachel Joyce | October 17, 2007 at 20:10
Thank you Rachel. I've added a link to your post from CH's frontpage, too.
Posted by: Editor | October 17, 2007 at 20:15
Cleo if you are put off by the Conservative Party, why don't you go somewhere else??
Posted by: Patsy Sergeant | October 17, 2007 at 23:31
I saw a score draw. Brown MUST get his speaking sorted out. As others have said, he kept stumbling. Camerons aside regarding the PPS wasnt quite the bitch-slap he gave Hilary Armstrong way back.
Vince Cable didnt do it for me. His joke "We are both happilly married men" I thought was terrible and the laughter was at him, not with him. He should thank his lucky stars he wont be leader on December 17th...
Posted by: James Maskell | October 18, 2007 at 09:24
Ann Treneman in today's Times on P.M.Qs - really worth a read. Very funny.
Posted by: Northernhousewife | October 18, 2007 at 13:07