After all the speculation and gossip the frontbench has finally been confirmed:
TREASURY - George Osborne
Philip Hammond
David Gauke
Mark Hoban
Justine Greening
HOME AFFAIRS - David Davis
David Ruffley
Damian Green
James Brokenshire
Andrew Rosindell
FOREIGN AFFAIRS - William Hague
David Lidington (can attend Shadow Cabinet)
Mark Francois
Keith Simpson
Click continue to see the full list....
JUSTICE - Nick Herbert
Henry Bellingham
Edward Garnier
David Burrowes
Eleanor Laing
HEALTH - Andrew Lansley
Mark Simmonds
Stephen O'Brien
Ann Milton
Mike Penning
DEFENCE - Liam Fox
Andrew Murrison
Gerald Howarth
Dr Julian Lewis
INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT - Andrew Mitchell
Mark Lancaster
Geoffrey Clifton-Brown
COMMUNITIES & LOCAL GOVERNMENT - Eric Pickles
Grant Shapps (can attend Shadow Cabinet)
Alistair Burt
Paul Goodman
Bob Neill
Jacqui Lait
ENVIRONMENT, FOOD & RURAL AFFAIRS - Peter Ainsworth
James Paice
Greg Barker
Bill Wiggin
Ann McIntosh
WORK & PENSIONS - Chris Grayling
Nigel Waterson
Mark Harper
James Clappison
Andrew Selous
INNOVATION, UNIVERSITIES & SKILLS - David Willetts
Boris Johnson
John Hayes
Adam Afriyie
CHILDREN, SCHOOLS & FAMILIES - Michael Gove
Nick Gibb
Maria Miller
Tim Loughton
TRANSPORT - Theresa Villiers
Julian Brazier
Stephen Hammond
Robert Goodwill
BUSINESS, ENTERPRISE AND REGULATORY REFORM - Alan Duncan
Mark Prisk
Jonathan Djanogly
Charles Hendry
CULTURE, MEDIA & SPORT - Jeremy Hunt
Hugh Robertson
Ed Vaizey
Tobias Ellwood
CABINET OFFICE - Francis Maude
Greg Clark
ATTORNEY GENERAL - Dominic Grieve
Jonathan Djanogly (Shadow Solicitor General)
HOUSE OF COMMONS - Theresa May
Shailesh Vara
NORTHERN IRELAND - Owen Paterson
Laurence Robertson
SCOTLAND - David Mundell
Ben Wallace
WALES - Cheryl Gillan
David Jones
WHIPS OFFICE - Patrick McLoughlin
Andrew Robathan (Deputy Chief Whip)
John Randall (Assistant Chief Whip)
Simon Burns
Michael Fabricant
Angela Watkinson
Crispin Blunt
David Evennett
John Baron
Brooks Newmark
Richard Benyon
Stewart Jackson
Jeremy Wright
Nick Hurd
DD must be furious!
Posted by: James Hill | July 06, 2007 at 12:58
Bloody good strong team. Overall, young and dynamic. Will set Labour back on their heels.
Posted by: Tory T | July 06, 2007 at 12:59
Why James?
Posted by: Deputy Editor | July 06, 2007 at 13:01
Out of interest, what do all the whips do and why are there so many?
Posted by: John | July 06, 2007 at 13:37
He has lost half his team and not got Mercer back.
Posted by: James Hill | July 06, 2007 at 13:46
Yes, indeed, why should David Davis be furious? Also, why no reference to Justice?
Posted by: Mrs Campbell | July 06, 2007 at 13:48
where is justice?
Posted by: PW | July 06, 2007 at 13:54
Given that Nick Herbert is DD's protege, I have no doubt that he will defer to DD on the big issues and stories....
Posted by: Empedocles | July 06, 2007 at 13:56
Never mind, DD, you might have cause to need a Union flag hoisted at some point so Rozzer might come in handy.
Posted by: Bluerinse | July 06, 2007 at 13:57
So do we count Justice as part of the Home Affairs team then? Surely not. What with the Constitution being the next big thing and all...
Posted by: Mrs Campbell | July 06, 2007 at 14:05
What happened to Henry Bellingham?
Posted by: NigelC | July 06, 2007 at 14:21
Where's Patrick Mercer, his exclusion from Defence is a disgrace.
Posted by: George Hinton | July 06, 2007 at 14:23
I added Justice just above Health.
Posted by: Deputy Editor | July 06, 2007 at 14:26
My understanding is that Ed Vaizey was passed over because he was as responsible for the museums row as Hugo Swire. He couldn't be promoted at the same time as his boss was fired.
Posted by: CCHQ Spy | July 06, 2007 at 14:36
Excellent news regarding Anne Milton - a former Nurse now in the department for Health. A real star of the 2005 intake.
Posted by: Henry Edward-Bancroft | July 06, 2007 at 14:41
Why doesn't he take the lead and appoint a shadow minister for England.
Posted by: IanP | July 06, 2007 at 14:46
May I be the latest to ask where Patrick Mercer is?
Posted by: IRJMilne | July 06, 2007 at 14:49
CCHQ spy
My understanding is that the sole reason Andrew Mitchell wasn't binned was because he booked himself a trip to Rwanda. As soon as the next opportunity arises Vaizey will take his job, which DC has marked down as his.
(Museums charging wasn't Vaizey)
Posted by: Jeffrey | July 06, 2007 at 14:51
Vaizey was at the lunch where museums charging was discussed and was a part of table conversation.
Posted by: CCHQ Spy | July 06, 2007 at 15:04
Do we have a list of CCHQ appointees?
Has Nadine Dorries been given a role there?
Posted by: Umbrella man | July 06, 2007 at 15:08
I have heard the 'Rwanda reason' for Mitchell being kept on. It was quite clever of Mr Mitchell to organise an Africa trip involving the leader that followed the likely reshuffle date.
Posted by: Jennifer Wells | July 06, 2007 at 15:10
If Jeffrey is right (14:51), it seems odd that it was previously reported that Andrew Mitchell was being considered for the Chairmanship. For a low profile and relatively non-partisan department, he has also done pretty well - quite visible with articles on this website etc. The Rwanda trip, however, could have been an inhibition on moving him to another Shadow Cabinet post.
Are the Lords appointments not considered worthy of being set out, or is the Editor trying to avoid another row about Sayeeda Warsi etc? Incidentally, although I did not see the whole programme, she seemed to do perfectly well on Question Time last night.
Posted by: Londoner | July 06, 2007 at 15:20
The point about Patrick Mercer is that, regardless of Dave's decision to leave him languishing on the back benches, he'll doubtless continue to be in demand to comment on defence, security, counter-terrorism and so forth both for the print and broadcast media, because he knows his stuff, speaks with authority and genuinely has something to contribute.
The same cannot be said of everyone on the list above.
Posted by: Drusilla | July 06, 2007 at 15:24
It would be interesting to list those MPs who have no role as Front Benchers, Party Officers or Leading policy review groups so that we can ponder what they are for??
Posted by: anon | July 06, 2007 at 15:31
Does anyone have a list of those who are now without a front bench role who previously had one?
Posted by: South West London Tory | July 06, 2007 at 15:32
Interesting that peers don't count as front bench any more.
Posted by: Ralph Lucas | July 06, 2007 at 15:43
Never mind Patrick Mercer, the two glaring omissions seem to be Sir Malcolm Rifkind (allegedly of his own accord) and Julie Kirkbride.
Posted by: Daniel VA | July 06, 2007 at 15:50
Why won't Malcolm Rifkind swallow his pride and accept a lesser job? Otherwise there doesnt seem much point in him bothering to stay in politics.
Posted by: Adam Jackson | July 06, 2007 at 15:59
It is a young team. It's a shame that some of the greybeards like Sir Malc aren't being brought back to add some experience.It would give us a greater edge in my opinion.
Still as Alan Hansen once advised Alex Ferguson 'you won't win anything with kids'. Alan was wrong in 1999, let's hope this idea will be wrong again in 2009 or whenever the next GE is.
Posted by: malcolm | July 06, 2007 at 16:06
I would have thought it was very obvious why Patrick Mercer hasn't reappeared - Surely we don't want to turn into New Labour in reappointing people who resigned only a few weeks earlier. It seems fair that he should spend a little more time in rehab. Frankly though, I see him that often on news programmes and in the papers as 'Former Conservative Security Spokesman' that hardly anything has changed since he quit - if anything his profile is even higher!
Posted by: Chris Heathcote | July 06, 2007 at 16:14
Etonians appear to be very under-represented. Anyone fancy checking out how many there are - I can only identify Henry Bellingham, Boris Johnston and, I assume, Nick Hurd. Maybe Richard Benyon and Ed Vaisey?
My man in the Shires has torn himself away from his teatime entertainment with the servant girl in the gazebo to inform me breathlessly: "This is a disgracefully low ratio for such a persecuted minority. With Boris off to be Mayor of London, and Oliver demoted and now the only OE in the Shadow Cabinet other than the leader, one does rather fear for the future. Is this young Cameron chap just a front man designed to reassure Etonians that all is well, when it isn't? That Heath chap knew his stuff, and had about 11 Etonians at a sitting (in his Cabinet I mean, don't be so rude). Can you get your computerwebthingy people to check this out for me, old man? Should shut up some of that tiresome chippiness though, eh?"
Posted by: Londoner | July 06, 2007 at 16:16
Have you had a good lunch Londoner?
Posted by: malcolm | July 06, 2007 at 16:19
Malcolm
Instead of casting aspersions on my excellent City lunching facilities, can't you got one of the girls in your town clerk's department down there in Essex to look up the facts for me? I am sure they could do it with a bit of goggling, and a notable elected personage with your clear charisma and air of command could I am sure get them to work on such an important bit of research in a jiffy.
P.S. If I had had a really good lunch I certainly wouldn't have been back from it as early as 16:16.
Posted by: Londoner | July 06, 2007 at 16:48
It's a shame that Nadine Dorries MP has not been appointed to a position. I suppose her out spoken stance on Grammar Schools, (She was the 1st MP to break rank) is a black mark against her name in the Whips' Office.
Posted by: James Thorne | July 06, 2007 at 16:50
Nah,I'm in the City too and as I'm sure you know looking up irrelevant facts on google is a sackable offence here!
As regards 16.16 I might agree with you old boy but I suppose it depends on what you started!
Posted by: malcolm | July 06, 2007 at 16:53
Vaizey is St Pauls, not Eton.
Glad to see this is 'official' now...have to say i dont think this was handled particularly well, by which i mean it happening in 2 stages (monday and weds eve/thurs - Weds eve is a terrible time to start a reshuffle - no one about). I also dont think leaking appointments on the net before they are confirmed is a good idea either.
Good set of appointments though.
Posted by: sdgsdgf | July 06, 2007 at 16:59
Can tell it's Friday. Morphing into the surreal.
No Hugo Swire I see. Presume he's done a Sir Malcolm Rifkind.
Posted by: Andrew Woodman | July 06, 2007 at 16:59
But it is Councillor Malcolm of Essex isn't it? I was merely suggesting you should pick up the phone to your underlings down there but, come to think of it, they will have all long since gone home for their tea.
I hope your City job isn't working for me or I'll have to be very cross at you wasting so much time entertaining the mug posters (or I think that's what the editor said he was doing today).
Posted by: Londoner | July 06, 2007 at 17:01
Definitely don't work for you Londoner. My boss is still 'at lunch' so I'm holding the fort.
Actually I had a nice lunch too with one of our GLA candidates where we solved all the problems facing our party!
I thought it wise to steer clear of the 'mug' thread although I am looking forward to receiving mine at some point before I die.
Posted by: malcolm | July 06, 2007 at 17:08
I would have thought Desmond Swayne was worth a place somewhere. Also are all the people in Lansley's Health team qualified to speak on the subject? If not, it seems surprising that Fox and Murrison, both doctors, are at Defence.
Posted by: David Belchamber | July 06, 2007 at 17:26
Patrick Mercer and Sir Malcolm Rifkind would be assets to the front bench and give it some much needed weight, but I don't suppose there'll be another reshuffle now till after the next election.
Posted by: gingeral | July 06, 2007 at 17:29
John @ 13:37 - There are so many whips because they each get a geographical area and a department to "look after". As far as the area is concerned, they look after the welfare of and generally keep an eye on candidates selected in that area as well as MPs and as far as the department is concerned, they go to the meeting every day and generally take responsibility for looking after matters in that policy area.
Posted by: Sally Roberts | July 06, 2007 at 17:43
Benyon is Bradfield, not Eton.
Posted by: anon | July 06, 2007 at 17:57
Personally can't understand why neither Mark Field, Greg Hands nor Julie Kirkbride are not included.
David Belchamber- I believe Swayne is Cameron's PPS hence he would be ineligible to serve as a Shadow Minister.
Also Andrew Murrison served in the recent Iraq War as a medic for the armed forces so presumably has some authority on defence issues.
Posted by: Legal eagle | July 06, 2007 at 17:57
A very good point about Greg Hands, Legal eagle. He's certainly someone i have come to respect a great deal.
Posted by: Editor | July 06, 2007 at 18:05
Chris Heathcote: Patrick Mercer did not resign. He was sacked, very wrongly and disgracefully.
I would like to see Malcolm Rifkind back somewhere but if you have been Foreign Secretary, I guess Shadow Secretary for Paperclips is a bit unattractive.
Posted by: IRJMilne | July 06, 2007 at 18:09
With Vaisey and Benyon confirmed by helpful posters above as not being Old Etonians, the Commons front bench now has a total of 2 Shadow Cabinet Old Etonians (inc the Leader himself), and 3 others (assuming young Hurd was Eton as his father was), out of the 93 names above (one appears twice but Cameron is omitted).
Would someone please go and tell the Guardian etc this?
Incidentally these numbers mean that almost half the parliamentary party are front benchers, which is fairly amazing. If an MP is not a complete idiot, or a distinguished elder statesman past such things, what exactly do they have to do NOT to be invited to join the Front Bench? I hope no-one says demonstrate independence of mind...
Posted by: Londoner | July 06, 2007 at 18:22
The answer to that is that some excellent people like Edward Leigh get appointed to run standing committees etc, there are other things to do in parliament besides being on the front bench.
Posted by: clive elliot | July 06, 2007 at 18:31
DCSF is strong, isn't it? Don't know Miller, but Gove, Gibb and Loughton are smart cookies. Not sure they would all, or even mostly, agree with the grammar-school policy, though. Could be that a quiet period for review could lead to a refinement of the position that is more to Tories' tastes. Those who want a change would probably be well-advised to give them a bit of time and lobby quietly. Of course, they'll have to hope that Balls doesn't find ways to keep the issue alive.
Posted by: bgp | July 06, 2007 at 18:31
Would like to see Patrick Mercer represent England.
He would definitely find it easy to gain the support in the shires and beyond, making him a strong force to represent English votes in Parliament.
Posted by: IanP | July 06, 2007 at 19:22
For the Tory public school Eton info, the following link may be of use:
http://politics.guardian.co.uk/conservatives/story/0,,2093552,00.html
Posted by: Bill | July 06, 2007 at 19:30
I'm surprised not to see Stephen Crabb on the list
Posted by: Erasmus | July 06, 2007 at 19:39
Empedocles - I wouldn't count on that if I were you.
Malcolm Rifkind - why?
Posted by: Barbara Villiers | July 06, 2007 at 22:43
We've missed you, Your Grace.
Posted by: Alexander Drake | July 07, 2007 at 03:25
Thank you very much Bill for a most useful link to the Guardian on current Tory MPs' education. The list shows there are in fact a total of 6 Old Etonians (OEs) amongst Cameron's 92 Commons frontbenchers (7 inc Cameron himself). I had not identified Clifton Brown and Wiggin. At 7.5%, this is just below the average for the Parliamentary Party as a whole of 7.6% (15 out of 198). Excluding Cameron himself (as the accusation has been that he appoints OEs disproportionately) the figures are 7.1% of Commons frontbenchers compared with 6.5% of all Tory MPs.
So three is no bias either way. My impression is that all these Etonian percentages would have been way higher not that many years ago. I may do some research some time to show this.
The independent school proportion of 112 out of 198 is, however, somewhat higher than I might have expected, I must admit.
Posted by: Londoner | July 08, 2007 at 00:15
Thank you, Londoner, for bringing a little statistical reality to that point.
I am amazed that so many of our supporters seem so preoccupied by the educational background of our front bench - personally, I'm more interested in whether they have the right qualities and skills for their jobs than which school they were sent to by ther parents as children. Strangely, I want people who are seeking to run our country to have been educated well!
Moreover, I want every child to be educated well. If we genuinely believe as a party in finding the best mechanism for today to give a excellent education to every child that is capable of bringing out their individual talents, perhaps those who've been fortunate enough to have one themselves shouldn't have to be afraid of showing it. I just wonder if the people who worry about where a Shadow Minister was educated are really on the right end of the education debate.
Posted by: Richard Carey | July 08, 2007 at 00:43