Recommendation 7: George Eustice currently coordinates media for David Cameron but he is having to do so with a much smaller team than his predecessors. The lack of a broad and experienced team has meant certain storms have not been brought under control quickly enough. The Polly Toynbee and Tosser affairs should never have been allowed to grow so big but the incident that has caused most upset amongst MPs was the hug-a-hoodie debacle. The appointment of a senior communications executive at CCHQ and a stronger team for the regional media are both essential.
This is spot on! The present press office team are out of their depth.
You can't completely write off the written press and only concentrate on broadcast media which is what seems to be the case.
Posted by: Rocco | December 14, 2006 at 16:08
Who could argue with this? I've been suprised that a leader who is far more image conscious than his last three predecessors should have allowed so many mistakes to happen. I don't want a Tory Alastair Campbell 'though!
Posted by: malcolm | December 14, 2006 at 16:28
It certainly needs improvement.
Posted by: HF | December 14, 2006 at 16:33
This is the first suggestion I totally agree with. I've just watched a Tory MP - chair of the defence committee - on C4 news, defending Lord Goldsmith's decision to end the SFO investigation into the Saudi arms deals with BAe. Whether one thinks this investigation was a good idea or not - it's not a "Tory vs Non-Tory" deal - it's absolutely ridiculous that a Tory MP steps up on the news to defend a deeply unpopular government decision. Let them take the flack for their cack-handed "governance" of arms deals.
Posted by: Graeme Archer | December 14, 2006 at 19:39
Spot on - press events need people to be better briefed and better rehearsed, along with rapid rebuttal from press officers of Labour's attacks. Some of Labour's criticisms and catchphrases have been allowed to gain traction, to the extent that they're even repeated by conservatives on here as fact from time to time.
I don't want a Tory Alastair Campbell though!
If only! I would disagree with Campbell about almost everything, but he was good - always got his message over in the end.
I think the ways in which he did his job and the very methods he employed meant that no-one else would be able to operate in the same way again, however.
Posted by: Richard Carey | December 14, 2006 at 21:15
No Richard, I most strongly disagree. Campbell was a sleazy hack and a liar who has debased politics throughout his sordid career.That he should have been in a position to produce a dodgy dossier and a sexed-up dossier which led this country into a war is almost criminal. I hope Cameron would never appoint such a figure.
Posted by: malcolm | December 14, 2006 at 21:32
I don't deny, Malcolm, that Campbell was a little unhinged, especially so towards the end of his period in Government, and I agree that the amount of power he had in Whitehall was horrendous. He was a formidable political operator, though, and got a job done.
Surely it must be possible to find someone who combines that same tenacity with a little integrity to run a comms operation!
Posted by: Richard Carey | December 14, 2006 at 21:48