In an interview with ePolitix.com, Francis Maude has compared the Conservative Party's 'Built to last' document to the Ten Commandments and the Lord's Prayer, saying brevity did not equal a lack of substance.
I thought we should have a go at rewriting David Cameron's major announcements in the form of the Ten Commandments. Here are a few ideas...
- Love thy neighbour and thy neighbour's hoodied child;
- Thou shalt share the proceeds of growth;
- Thou shalt leave the EPP, but not yet;
- Thou shalt not overfill thine kettle;
- Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's chocolate orange;
- Thou shalt keep it real...
Which ones would you add?
thou shalt turn the other cheek to Conservative.Home
Posted by: Lord Haw Haw | September 29, 2006 at 11:27
At the risk of being sacriligious:
Thou shalt not make to thyself any graven policies. Thou shalt not bow down to them, nor worship then.
Twelve years shall they (Nu) Labour and do all that they have to do, but the thirteenth year is the year of Dave the Chameleon.
Honour thy Margaret and thy Norman, that thou dost not fall out with too many traditional Tory voters (like me).
Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's ass. (Aimed mainly at the Lib Dems.)
Posted by: Richard Weatherill | September 29, 2006 at 11:30
Write out 50 times: "I must learn how to spell sacrilegious" - especially if I'm going to be rude about CCHQ adverts in The Guardian!
Posted by: Richard Weatherill | September 29, 2006 at 11:32
Thou shalt always covet the Arctic Monkeys
Posted by: Rob | September 29, 2006 at 11:33
I think you got it badly wrong about the neighbours chocolate Orange.Surely it should read 'thou shalt force my neighbour to dispose of his chocolate Orange or at least hide it'. Chocolate oranges as we all know are evil!
Posted by: malcolm | September 29, 2006 at 11:36
Mr Maude is right to point out that brevity doesn't necessarily equate with a lack of substance. However, a lack of substance (as in BtL) surely does equal, er, a lack of substance.
Posted by: Richard Weatherill | September 29, 2006 at 11:39
Though shalt buy a tandem for thyself and thy chauffeur
Posted by: Gwendolyn | September 29, 2006 at 11:47
Thou shalt not kill the NHS ...even though thy cancer groweth and thy prognosis worsens thou must wait in pain and misery in the queue :neither shalt thou FLY abroad for affordable private treatment as flying pollutes the atmosphere
Thou shalt not desire, if thou art middle class and of modest income, a Grammar School education for thy bright offspring
Thou shalt not travel abroad thy holidays or visit thy relatives who have escaped from the hell hole that the UK has become
Posted by: verulamgal | September 29, 2006 at 11:51
"Saul hath killed his thousands but David hath killed his tens of thousands" (1 Samuel 18)?
Posted by: William Norton | September 29, 2006 at 12:24
Posted by: Mark Fulford | September 29, 2006 at 12:28
Thou shalt cease to turn a wishful blind eye to the deteriorating constitutional situation within the United Kingdom and to the growing discrimination against England , which is both immoral and unsustainable
and that
Thou shalt recognise England as an ancient and historic nation in the same way as you already recognise Scotland and Wales
and that
Thou shall desist from the sheer ill thought out madness of English Votes On English Matters ( EVOEM )and likewise recognise that if implemented it would be a highly divisive ,illogical and practical nightmare which would bring scorn and ridicule on the British parliament and be the single dominating factor in hastening the end of the United Kingdom
and that
Thou shalt accept that there is an easily comprehensible and logical alternative , namely that of an English parliament with the same rights and competencies as the Scottish parliament and that this will create a de facto federal United Kingdom and that this and only this will be the single and enlightened measure most certain to draw the countries of our United Kingdom together and provide us with a further 300 years of British history .
Posted by: T Sinden | September 29, 2006 at 12:41
Thou shalt keep any promises made to thy electors, for if thou dost not, thou wilt be cast out into outer darkness. - Verily!
Posted by: christina speight | September 29, 2006 at 12:48
This site is going to put Labours spin machine out of business.
Posted by: useful | September 29, 2006 at 12:54
Except, of course, that NuCon is hardly likely to express itself in the language of King James, or his Bible...
Posted by: Drew SW London | September 29, 2006 at 13:07
One commandment really ought to be Reagan's
Thou shalt not speak ill of a fellow Conservative - even if he is called Heffer.
Posted by: John Moss | September 29, 2006 at 13:23
Thou shalt pay homage to thy Guardian!
Posted by: Christina | September 29, 2006 at 13:33
Thou shalt honour those who have been to public school above all others.
Posted by: Martin Curtis | September 29, 2006 at 13:38
Thou shalt castigate the English as ignorant, sour little Englanders until the they learn to respect us Scots always and forever
Thou shalt pay homage to the great overlord Barnett
Thou shalt never surrender power to an English Parliament
Thou shalt remain silent while English women die of cancer after being denied the same drugs that their neighbours in Britain get on the NHS
Thou shalt financially honour and respect thy neighbours and their pensioners, but spit on the English if they dare to complain
Posted by: Henry | September 29, 2006 at 13:43
Tim - I notice even a relatively lighthearted article brings out the wailing and gnashing of teeth (and foaming of mouth) of the usual green ink nutters (i.e. UKIP rejects) who never lose an opportunity to slate Cameron on this site. When will they get a life? Memo to UKIPers on Conservative Home: We don't like you, we aren't on the same side (on account of you deliberately targeting Conservative candidates whenever you can)- so why don't you start up your own weblog with endless video reruns of Nigel Farage and other tedious nonentities?
Posted by: Stewart Jackson MP | September 29, 2006 at 13:47
ConHome HeadBangers Golden Rule:
Thou shalt not forget to keep taking the tablets.
Posted by: Perdix | September 29, 2006 at 13:57
I'm sorry, Mr Jackson (if it is indeed you). There are those of us on this site who, whilst we wouldn't touch UKIP with a bargepole, nevertheless have genuine concerns about the direction in which David Cameron is leading the Party. (Though there are no doubt UKIP "nutters" trolling the site as well.)
Posted by: Richard Weatherill | September 29, 2006 at 14:02
Is that the same Stewart Jackson MP who publicly declared his support for David Davis and then stabbed him in the back by voting for David Cameron?
Posted by: TFA Tory | September 29, 2006 at 14:13
Thou shalt understand what cultural Marxism truly is, and in using its language to deceive thine enemies, shall take care not to deceive thyself.
Posted by: SimonNewman | September 29, 2006 at 14:15
I know this is just a bit of light relief but Maude has to be joking when he compares the BtL document to the Ten Commandments... I can see a number of people not being very happy about that comparison.
Posted by: James Maskell | September 29, 2006 at 14:39
Dear "TFA Tory" - posting anonymously - Do please get your facts right whilst spluttering into your gin and tonic.
I voted for David Davis in the first ballot, as I promised him I would. I immediately wrote to him after the first ballot and advised him that I could not profess support for him in public and vote for David Cameron in the second ballot in secret, as this would be dishonest and dishonourable.
It's called changing your mind - when the circumstances change - with courtesy, honour and decency.
I was never a member of his campaign team but believe him to be a great Parliamentary performer and a superb Shadow Home Secretary.
I have never regretted voting for David Cameron - especially if he is loathed by small minded, nihilistic oppositionalists like you who live in a mental bunker and want to consign my party to the same place.
Posted by: Stewart Jackson MP | September 29, 2006 at 15:53
I'm so glad we're no longer "the nasty party".
Posted by: Richard Weatherill | September 29, 2006 at 16:01
Thou shalt not lack humour even if one has a majority of only 2740 .
Posted by: michael mcgough | September 29, 2006 at 16:03
I've closed this thread as it has taken a sharp turn for the worse.
Posted by: Editor | September 29, 2006 at 16:05