This is me on my new bike earlier this afternoon (photo taken by Mr Iain Dale). I've moved into an office on London's Doughty Street and a bike is the fastest and cheapest way of getting to and from Westminster. Note the panniers!
« 'Blue-green taxation' set to pay for cuts in business taxation | Main | David Cameron's green tax gamble »
The comments to this entry are closed.
Nice photo Tim.
Frankly the way those big city drivers seem to behave in London I would feel safer walking myself! Now where is your helmet???
Posted by: Jonathan Sheppard | August 31, 2006 at 18:10
Was thinking the same Jonathan. Also shouldn't there be a lexus behind you carrying your change of clothes?
Posted by: Andrew Woodman | August 31, 2006 at 18:11
Ignoring safety. Cycling in the middle of the road. No helmet or illuminous vest to show where you are. Tut tut Tim. You're letting the side down.
I walk everywhere (and I mean EVERYWHERE). If I cant walk it to the destination, I catch the train then trek the last mile or so... Its safer to walk it. I also think its more exercise.
Posted by: James Maskell | August 31, 2006 at 18:52
Ive just been struck by a thought. No tie, no helmet or other safety gear, flashy dress sense...Tim, tell me you havent converted to the Cameroons, please!
Posted by: James Maskell | August 31, 2006 at 18:55
No tie, no helmet or other safety gear
People are too obsessed with safety these days and keeping dry - I go out in the rain in T shirt and shorts these days (April to September anyway), reckon it's good for me - some of my Scottish relatives used to take early morning swims in Lochs, it's no wonder there aren't any real men left as everyone is so protecting of themselves these days encouraged by an overfearful state - something that has to be fought against.
Posted by: Yet Another Anon | August 31, 2006 at 19:11
The whole transport debate is interesting. Yes its possible to use public tranport in London - but does it really work elsewhere. Like James I try to walk lots of places, however walking or even public transport really isnt workable for a 60 mile round trip to work - and thats what the politicians have to realise. Yes I would rather not have to go on the M1 to work - but whats the alternative. We don't have a Underground rail system up here, and trains cost more than driving and really dont go where you want them to. Cars Im afraid do.
Posted by: Jonathan Sheppard | August 31, 2006 at 19:21
At some point somewhere will build a Maglev underground network.
Really technology has to look to the future and it's good that it isn't all just about new ways of delivering cruddy pop music with better sound quality to people.
Posted by: Yet Another Anon | August 31, 2006 at 20:05
Well if poor Guido's experiences are anything to go by, you'll be reporting the theft within a few days (one bike, with bell, paniers...)
As to the vest'n'helmet debate, I see DC has a more cavalier approach than young Master Osborne (who perhaps isn't such a Cameroon as we thought).
Posted by: Don Jameson | August 31, 2006 at 20:07
If Tim wore a helmet, it would mess up his lovely hair and we girls wouldn't stand for that...
Posted by: lucy74 | August 31, 2006 at 20:11
Do you legally need to wear a helmet? Been a decade since a rode a bike (my bmx got nicked)
Posted by: Andrew Woodman | August 31, 2006 at 20:16
Cycling in from Doughty Street eh Tim? Boris rides again.
Who are you taking your room from? The Speccie? Or Geoffrey Robinson QC's radical human rights set of chambers?
http://www.doughtystreet.co.uk/
Posted by: Simon Chapman | August 31, 2006 at 20:57
Don't forget to pedal over to 1 Warwick Row to take that photo of you handing £100 over to Matthew Elliot
Posted by: Chad | August 31, 2006 at 21:07
For those worried about Mr Montgomerie's excellent sartorial elegfance, may I remind you that I did advise Mr M to tuck his shoirt in before he got his leg over.
Posted by: Iain Dale | August 31, 2006 at 21:09
lucy74: "If Tim wore a helmet, it would mess up his lovely hair and we girls wouldn't stand for that..."
I will rule out any possibility of sacasm in your remark and promote you to being my favourite visitor to this site!
Posted by: Editor | August 31, 2006 at 21:09
Soon Chad, soon...
Posted by: Editor | August 31, 2006 at 21:11
"Soon Chad, soon..."
:-)
It will at least be small consolation for you giving my crown of favourite visitor to Lucy for what was blatant sucking-up. ;-)
Posted by: Chad | August 31, 2006 at 21:13
Can't see you winning that accolade Chad!!
Posted by: Andrew Woodman | August 31, 2006 at 21:23
'i did advise Mr M to tuck his shirt in before he got his leg over.'
Double entendre anyone?
Posted by: David Banks | August 31, 2006 at 21:43
I thought he was talking about Edwina and Mr Major David.
Posted by: Andrew Woodman | August 31, 2006 at 21:58
Have you been drinking Mr Dale? Personally I'v never thought about tucking in my shirt when contemplating getting my leg over but I guess we're all different! Well done Tim,I hope you turn out to be a more considerate cyclist than Boris who used to be a maniac on his bike.
Posted by: malcolm | August 31, 2006 at 22:03
Ha ha , Edwina and John Major - nice one!
Posted by: David Banks | August 31, 2006 at 22:05
Well as long as he didnt lift his shirt...
Posted by: Malvolio | August 31, 2006 at 22:27
Now, now, Malvolio. Less of that kind of talk or you'll be hauled up before the thought police.
Posted by: Iain Dale | August 31, 2006 at 22:49
I have thought of cycling to work but it'd be such an effort dragging the bike upstairs just to save time on that long 10 foot trek to the office from my bedroom....
Posted by: Ted | August 31, 2006 at 23:24
Good stuff, fitter than I.
Interesting observation is that your motivation to ride is not green per se but rather because it is the 'fastest and cheapest' method. Green is a side benefit you could say...whatever works is fine with me and if it takes green to be faster and cheaper to catch the mainstreams imagination then so be it.
Namaste
Al
Posted by: City Hippy | August 31, 2006 at 23:32
I'm glad my chosen method of transport is green, City Hippy, but you're right... I wouldn't be biking if it wasn't cheaper and/ or faster than the alternatives...
(PS I'll buy a helmet tmrw)
Posted by: Editor | August 31, 2006 at 23:37
Glad you've come to the dark side, Tim!
But, you need to take a leaf out of Ollie L's book & get one of these....
http://www.bromptonbicycle.co.uk/
Seriously, though, I started cycling to work last year, and haven't looked back.
On a brief contract assignment near Liverpool St last year when 7/7 attacks happened. Walking back to Waterloo a quite surreal communal experience, but gazing wistfully at people on bicycles. In a way I'd kind of lost my bottle after nearly 15 years of living & commuting in London after that, but also realised I wouldn't for a while be able to rely on the tube to get me from A to B in X minutes (don't laugh - as long as you weren't on the Northern Line you could mostly rely on it). Security alerts, etc, were going to be disruptive for a while to come.
So I got a Brompton (SouthWestTrains policy is not to allow non-folders on pretty much any useful commuter train now).
Best thing I've done in a long time. And it's faster than the tube was.
Tim should wear a helmet? Absolutely. But c'mon folks - this is a photo op!
Being in middle of road is bad? Absolutely not! If you need to be, then go there. Just don't dawdle - but in most cases you can go faster than or at an equal speed to the other traffic. If you reckon that all cyclists should be flush on the edge of the road then you've never cycled in a city - discarded drinks cans/bottles, potholes, rainwater drains, (esp) pedestrians all present serious hazards.
Cycling in London aint as bad or dangerous as it's made out to be. Keep visible, keep your wits about you, observe everything, anticipate what pedestrians & drivers are going to do, and you'll most likely be fine. I'd now rather cycle in London than on the country lanes where I grew up.
Good on you, Tim.
Posted by: RichardS | September 01, 2006 at 00:23
In all the helmet/hairstyle, jacket/shirt/legover, paniers/Lexus debates everyone has missed the essential point: the Editor doesn't actually appear to be looking where he's going.
Whatever happened to keeping death off the roads?
Posted by: William Norton | September 01, 2006 at 08:32
Good stuff Tim, I hope you managed to get the VAT back on the buy-a-bike scheme?
Now theres a good way to reduce taxes, just wish it was better advertised by employers. Wonder what other tax cuts to help the environment we could make?
Posted by: Oberon Houston | September 01, 2006 at 08:33
Cycling towards the middle of the road is preferable to the pavement, which is where people seem to prefer to cycle (on the right hand side!) in my part of Oxford.
Many's the time they've whizzed past me and missed me by an inch. Many's the time I would have been entitled to take their pump and ^*"&% *&£^!
Posted by: Tom Greeves | September 01, 2006 at 09:35
Just wanted to agree with Jonathon Sheppard 19:21.
Cycling would be great if it even approached being practical, but out here in the sticks it is a non-starter.
Posted by: deborah | September 01, 2006 at 12:07
Good on you Tim!
Posted by: Jonathan M Scott | September 01, 2006 at 13:12
I think you are great for doing it though and for being honest and lets face it, if it ain't cheap and fast a lot of people will not do it. All other things being equal.
You might be interested in a new series of posts I am doing on The Ecologist Blog which will look at my attempt to green my own life in a simple way that others, yourself included, would be inclined to follow.
Either way
Namaste
Al
Posted by: Al | September 01, 2006 at 13:14
"I will rule out any possibility of sacasm in your remark and promote you to being my favourite visitor to this site!"
Of course no sarcasm intended and many thanks for the promotion! Do I get any special benefits for holding this title - chauffeur, nice badge, sash etc?!
"It will at least be small consolation for you giving my crown of favourite visitor to Lucy for what was blatant sucking-up. ;-)"
Now, now Chad. Don't be a sore loser! I am sure you have very nice hair too!
Posted by: lucy74 | September 01, 2006 at 14:13
Do you legally need to wear a helmet?
No, there are no requirements to wear and protective clothing or helmet, front and back lights are required to be fitted and in order if the bike is going to be used when it is dark, cyclists also are subject to the same rules regarding drinking and are supposed to signal when turning but when was the last time anyone saw a cyclist signalling or paying any attention to rules of the road generally?
Posted by: Yet Another Anon | September 01, 2006 at 15:13
On the subject of mass public transport, I found an article that's very interesting here: http://www.uwgb.edu/dutchs/PSEUDOSC/MassTransit.HTM (link source: reddit)
Posted by: Julian Morrison | September 01, 2006 at 16:54
No need to ride a bike - plant a tree.
Trees contain 250-300 gigatons of carbon, the atmosphere 800-830 gigatons and the annual emissions of fossil carbon are about 7 gigatons.
Changing De-forestation of 0.5% p.a. to Re-forestation of 0.5% p.a. would make a huge impact on carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.
Posted by: Fred Baker | November 25, 2006 at 09:14
Not Coming out because i am 100% not gay
By Sir Stelios Haji-Ioannou 19th June 2006 - Manchester News
contact:
[email protected]
I am fed up with people calling me a Big Bubble Queen, what does that mean? I wish to make clear that like Ashley Cole and Master Steps i Sir Stelios Haji-Ioannou am definately not gay in any way at all as i have had many high profile relationships with real women such as Dannii m
Minogue sister of Kylie Minogue.
My legal policy:
With regard to my legal policy. I am sure you will understand that i, Sir Stelios Haji-Ioannou cannot permit others to use my family name and the smear campaign i have had to endure notwithstanding and without the certainty that i will sue the person or publication for libel due to rights in my character and family name being prejudiced. It follows that no use should be made of the Stelios Haji-Ioannou name (or anything similar to it) and if any smear whether directly or indirectly relating to gay or homosexual practices is made you or your publication will be punished to the full extent of the law. And in addition i will seek damages and compensation. The thought of being gay repulses and disgusts me and has brought a great deal of shame and embarrisment to my family especially as it is not true. I have nothing against gays or lesbians personally and i do not wish to offend anyone at all please do not misunderstand me i actually employ many gays and do not discriminate but i will sue anyone who calls me Stelios Haji-Ioannou Gay or says Sir Stelios Haji-Ioannou is a homosexual
I also wish to deny that i have donated money to the Labour Party in order to get my Knighthood. I am not the only Tax exile to recieve a knighthood look at Philip Green.
Posted by: bigeasy | April 16, 2007 at 09:38