All major cities are to be "adopted" by Shadow Ministers so that they have a connection to the highest levels of the Conservative Party. The Yorkshire Post revealed the Yorkshire appointments a month ago. There are some more English cities to be confirmed shortly but here are the appointments so far:
Minister for Birmingham
Andrew Mitchell
Minister for Bristol
Liam Fox
Minister for Coventry
Caroline Spelman
Minister for Edinburgh
Lord Strathclyde
Minister for Glasgow
David Mundell
Ministers for Leeds and Bradford
William Hague and Eric Pickles
Minister for Liverpool
Chris Grayling
Minister for Manchester
George Osborne
Minister for Newcastle
Alan Duncan
Minister for Wolverhampton
Francis Maude
Some of these cities don't have any Conservative councillors or MPs, on the whole these appointments seem sensible choices and will hopefully help to ensure urban issues are considered carefully within the party's strategy.
Deputy Editor
Alan Duncan for Newcastle seems strange. It's nowhere near him. I'd have thought William Hague would have been the logical choice.
Wonder who the East Midlands cities are getting.
Posted by: Andrew Woodman | July 17, 2006 at 20:06
And who gets Sunderland?
Posted by: Iain Murray | July 17, 2006 at 20:15
Cardiff?
Posted by: DAVID | July 17, 2006 at 20:27
What about Reading?
Posted by: Julian Morrison | July 17, 2006 at 20:32
I'm not sure there's supposed to be rhyme or reason to these twinnings. It's about presentation. Some of them appear to be token gestures - someone to write to; someone to make a few high-profile visits for the media; someone to exert a 'presence' in the absence of any councillors or sitting Conservative MPs.
Posted by: Nadim | July 17, 2006 at 20:50
Can someone please tell me whether all this is necessary?
Posted by: Voice from the South West | July 17, 2006 at 21:29
In view of the rivalry between Edinburgh and Glasgow it seems a bit odd to give Edinburgh to Lord Strathclyde. Especially when the Marquess of Lothian is Michael Ancram.
Posted by: Bishop Hill | July 17, 2006 at 21:35
Julian - Reading has a Conservative MP, so doesnt really need a Minister. It is also not a City. However I would have thought that Oxford needed some attention!
Posted by: Richard Willis | July 17, 2006 at 21:54
The party has for a long time had a poor feel for issues in many parts of the country. Only time will tell if this will improve matters, but I for one welcome the effort being made.
Posted by: Adrian Owens | July 17, 2006 at 22:00
I think edinburgh could have been given to Fox surely, to reflect its importance as the sort of city that should be making a conservative gain in. Perhaps Strarthclyde could then have been given Glasgow and Mundell Aberdeen perhaps?
Posted by: Andrew Hardie | July 17, 2006 at 22:01
Oxford is a very important suggestion.
It is presently being run by a Labour and predominantly Muslim cohort, as though the two go hand in hand. It is surrounded by safe Conservative seats, many of whom are in the shadow cabinet or have some shadow ministerial brief.
Why not Boris for Oxford?
Posted by: Nadim | July 17, 2006 at 22:22
This is very amusing and very reminiscent of the scene in Reservoir Dogs when they are handing out the names.
"Aah why do I have to be Minister for Newcastle. Can't William have it? I want to be Minister for Coventry."
"No, William's minister for Bradford and Leeds. He can't be minister of the whole North of England. You get what you're given."
"But Coventry is not too far from my pad in London! I can't speak Geordie. Please, can I have Coventry?"
"No!"
Posted by: Chad | July 17, 2006 at 22:23
"Oxford is a very important suggestion.
It is presently being run by a Labour"
I thought it's run by the Libdems in a minority administration.
But there has been a couple of defections in recent weeks, so I don't know if something has changed
Posted by: Andrea | July 17, 2006 at 22:36
And Cambridge?
Posted by: Justin Hinchcliffe | July 17, 2006 at 23:33
surely Andrew Lansley would be the natural choice for Cambridge. His seat is next door.
Posted by: Andrea | July 17, 2006 at 23:38
OK. After all my carping about chameleonism I have to admit this is a genuinely creative idea that does no harm. Well done PRs! It might even do some good and must be worth a try.
During the cold war when I was in the TA I used to think we were too ill-equipped and undertrained to fight a mobile war but might be quite tough to dislodge if allowed to adopt a particular (German) area well in advance. Instead they always had us doing Dad's Army type frontal assaults over mowed grass with no sense of what we would actually do in Germany when the balloon went up. Don't know if this is relevant but it sprung to mind seeing G Osborne adopt Madchester and Mr Duncan Newcastle, and is offered in a spirit of humility.
Posted by: Henry Mayhew | July 18, 2006 at 02:36
Presumably David Davis will be assigned to Hull?
Posted by: Andy D | July 18, 2006 at 03:11
Ministers for Leeds and Bradford
William Hague and Eric Pickles
Ha ! Ha ! Ha ! At least Cameron has a GSOH. People have not forgotten Eric Pickles and the mess he created.........this should go down like a lead balloon.
http://tinyurl.com/fbr97
Posted by: TomTom | July 18, 2006 at 07:07
I thought Oliver Heald had been appointed Minister for Sheffield
Posted by: Simon Mallett | July 18, 2006 at 07:16
Its an inventive approach to a big problem. I am sure that at least some of the Shadow cabinet will be able to have an impact.
Posted by: Serf | July 18, 2006 at 07:18
Simon, the Yorkshire Post did say that Heald got Sheffield, and I'm sure that's true, but he wasn't on the party's confirmed list.
Posted by: Deputy Editor | July 18, 2006 at 07:36
Oliver Heald had a meeting with the Sheffield Conservatives a couple of weeks ago I believe, so it's pretty certain.
Posted by: libertorian | July 18, 2006 at 09:43
Wakefield?? We got 4 net gains in Wakey at the last locals. There is such potential here but, once agian, we are forgotten.
Posted by: Antony Calvert | July 18, 2006 at 10:22
I assume Cheryl Gillan will be appointed Minister For Cardiff.
Posted by: Daniel Vince-Archer | July 18, 2006 at 10:52
It says so much that people think Cambridge represents the same sort of challenge to the Conservatives as Sheffield or Newcastle...
Posted by: Adam | July 18, 2006 at 11:15
Oxford is too far gone to bother with - and in a different way to other cities. The middle classes there have turned into sandal-wearing, Guardian and Independent reading loons. In most of its leafy suburbs its the LibDems vs the Greens. Heck - a good number of the members of the North Oxford Conservative club vote Lib Dem, and the Constituency Association (in Oxford West) is a bigger joke than the University Conservative Association.
The one way we might win it back is by putting up a striking candidate. Someone like Louise Bagshawe might be able to do it, but this is one seat which worthiness and hard work alone will not be enough to take.
Posted by: Gildas | July 19, 2006 at 16:48
Leeds is a city with no conservative MP's yet the Tories have been running the council in a joint administration with the Lib Dem's. we in the conservative party have got to win in the north to get into government. Seats like Elmet, Colne Valley and Shipley need to be won and retained.
Posted by: Matt Robinson | July 19, 2006 at 20:12
The Marquess of Lothian sits for Devizes - some schlepp up and over the Border for him to be a Minister for the Glens or whatever!
Posted by: sjm | September 20, 2006 at 09:06
I think some of the comments on here might display evidence of the fair criticism that the party hasn't really addressed the North seriously for a number of years. While William Hague might be a good choice for any number of North East cities, there shouldn't be a need to stretch the resources by pulling him to Leeds and Newcastle and is only there because we have so few Northern MPs.
The constituency I live in is, I believe, a case in point. Leeds, North West, is a seat which from the 60s up to 97 was Tory held (and for much of that time very safe and even in 97 pretty low down the Labour target list). When the Labour MP retired at the last election it was taken by the LibDems and my impression was that we really didn't put a lot of effort into campaigning here, at least compared with the blitz of campaigning done by the Lib Dems. In terms of demographics the seat includes the traditional "old Yorkshire" market town of Otley and some of the most exclusive suburbs which together really wouldn't look out of place in Surrey, a large student population and Muslim community in Burley/Hyde Park. If we can't appeal to such a constituency it suggests that we can't appeal to the country more widely. It seems to me wrong to abandon seats like this to the fate of Oxford West and allow it to become LibDem heartland.
Well done to DC and the shadow cabinet for recognising and taking active steps to address this key issue in trying to make the party able to win!
Posted by: Angelo Basu | September 20, 2006 at 09:56
As a Tory of North Eastern origin I find it pretty dissapointing that only one of the big North Eastern cities is represented. I cannot really imagine that many people from Durham or Sunderland are particularly pleased that the only North Eastern city in the list is Newcastle.
Posted by: Disraeli | September 20, 2006 at 10:34
Mat! Have you forgotten that Philip Davies won Shipley for us?? And judging from the high profile he is maintaining, he will retain it.
Posted by: Annabel Herriott | September 20, 2006 at 15:48
If this is about showing we want to win in these areas then I would have thought we could do with some help to the SW. Cornwall might not have a city but it could certainly do with some attention from the shadow cabinet.
Posted by: Kevin Davis | September 21, 2006 at 08:50
Instead of loading M.P.'s with Shadow Minister duties, why not appoint Tory peers
to do some of the donkey work in the big cities? The M.P.'s like to think they are more legitimate than peers, but many peers
have good political talents which ought to be used.
Posted by: Timothy Stroud | September 26, 2006 at 18:44
That love, not time, heals all wounds?
Posted by: air yeezys | November 13, 2010 at 03:57
Without art the crudeness of reality would make the world unbearable~
Posted by: Cheap Jordans | January 24, 2011 at 02:35