Conservative health spokesman Andrew Lansley has used an interview with The Spectator's Fraser Nelson to talk about a stroke he suffered 14 years ago whilst playing cricket:
"‘I went to pick up a ball, stood up again and suddenly I couldn’t stand straight,’ he remembers. ‘I tried to stabilise myself on the pitch, but I had lost my balance. I walked down to the pavilion and sat down, but it got progressively worse.’ He collapsed and was taken to hospital where he was diagnosed with a simple ear infection and sent home the next day.
But his then wife, a junior doctor, was instantly suspicious. ‘She said I had no symptoms of ear infection, no raised temperature, nothing. Now it was true, and continues to be true, that if you have somebody who knows their way about, you can argue your way through the system without being dismissed by the authorities. We badgered the GP so much that he eventually sent me off to have an MRI scan.’"
Lansley was referred to a private hospital, where the staff invited his wife to look at the scanning machinery, then quite new. ‘She is a doctor, so they talked her through it. They were all chatting away merrily as the results came in, then they suddenly all went a bit quiet. The pictures came up with bits of dead brain.’ It was thought at first that the cause was a tumour, but then the picture became clearer. At the age of 36, and in full health, Mr Lansley had suffered a stroke.
While most strokes are suffered by pensioners with heart disease, they also affect the young. For reasons Mr Lansley’s doctors have never managed to establish, a vein in his neck had been damaged and the blood had started to clot internally. When he picked up the cricket ball, a clot had temporarily blocked the blood supply to a part of his brain. He was shocked by the randomness of it all: had blood been denied to a different area of the brain he could be paralysed or worse. ‘It could have killed me. It was just a chance event that the net result for me was just losing my balance.’"
Fraser Nelson writes that Mr Lansley's decision to talk about his condition "fits a pattern of behaviour in the Cameron Conservatives":
"At a time when the party does not have a health policy, Mr Lansley has the unusual job of championing ideas which do not yet exist. But he can pick themes and plot personal narratives, which are increasingly considered more powerful than political policy."
The interview also reveals that Mr Lansley was encouraged to stand in last year's Tory leadership election by Oliver Letwin. Mr Letwin later became Mr Cameron's first big backer.
Personally I think Mr Lansley would better off spending his time talking about the crisis in the health service and the sacking of nurses and doctors rather than his own health. The question as to be asked have we ever had a shadow health secretary worse than Mr Lansley? Personally I can`t think of one!
Posted by: Jack Stone | July 06, 2006 at 09:28
I think it is good that Andrew shared his experience and good that we have a Shadow Health Sec who has had a very important bad experience with the NHS and wants to address the problems. I hope his passion will produce fruits for the NHS.
Posted by: Christina | July 06, 2006 at 09:48
Lansleys talking about the stroke is his version of Ivan Cameron. Adds a personal side. I personally think it should be kept out...its not that important as to why he cares about the NHS (in any case he needed private healthcare to find out the cause of the problems...), but he needs to start doing more about fighting the Government, hes been strangely quiet.
Posted by: James Maskell | July 06, 2006 at 10:02
I disagree James, and think Cameron's personal experience with the NHS through his son has added a valuable insight.
Posted by: Chad | July 06, 2006 at 10:13
Understanding a person’s formative experiences is a great aid to understanding how they will react to situations and problems. Since we elect MPs to deal with any number of unknown issues that will occur during their term, I consider it very helpful to know their backstory, not just what they say.
Posted by: Mark | July 06, 2006 at 10:26
In my view there is nothing wrong with Andrew Lansley sharing his experience. If nothing else, it shows that he has had direct experience of receiving healthcare for a serious condition. It also shows he is human. People become deaf and blind to statistics when they are quoted at them ad infinitum. They are always interested in reading about and hearing new ideas.
Posted by: Sally Roberts | July 06, 2006 at 10:39
Personal experiences make a very powerful narrative. They are best used to illustrate an argument in favour of a policy, or against current practice. They also make a politician appear more human, but they cannot replace good argument or good policy.
Andrew Lansley seems a very nice person, which is a good start. We now need some policy.
Posted by: Derek | July 06, 2006 at 10:40
I completely agree. Full marks to both Cameron and Lansley on this.
It is like the new Tory grammar schools opposition.
If someone like David Davis, a grammar school boy from a poor background who has benefitted from the social mobility it has given him presented an argument why they are/are not needed it would have resonance.
When it is presented by a wealthy old etonian, it seems like the elite preaching to the poor.
Posted by: Chad | July 06, 2006 at 10:48
It is such a shame that the health ministry is considered so inferior to the Home office and the Foreign office. I think Liam Fox would be the ideal candidate for shadow health secretary as he is a doctor himself, so who could deny his knowledge and experience. Unfortunately that would mean demoting him, and i think he is one of the few really excellent people we've got.
Posted by: Kris F | July 06, 2006 at 11:01
While I think Andrew Lansley does a good job I think it could be good for the party and a good PR move to make Anne Milton Shadow Health Secretary. She could probably do a better job than Lansley and being a former nurse might help.
Posted by: Disillusioned | July 06, 2006 at 11:43
Liam Fox was an excellent shadow health secretary.It's a pity he was moved. Personally I think health is a very important portfolio and we need some one like Dr Fox to cover health
Andrew Lansley's experiences make interesting reading. It's good Andrew made a full recovery, but I can't help noting that he had access to a PRIVATE hospital where his stroke was eventually diagnosed.Would the story have had such a happy ending had he relied on the NHS alone?
Posted by: verulamgal | July 06, 2006 at 11:56
Would the story have had such a happy ending had he relied on the NHS alone?
I would expect it makes it all the more important to him that a) such equipment and service be generally available and b) the private sector acts as a safeguard against state failure.
Posted by: Mark | July 06, 2006 at 12:13
I have heard Anne Milton speak and like her but I'm not sure if she has the ability to handle such a massive brief or would devote any more time to it than Andrew Lansley does.
I think Lansley definitely needs to be higher profile. This is ground we must fight on
Posted by: Tory Solicitor | July 06, 2006 at 12:26
I wasn't aware that Anne Milton had been a nurse. I agree that this would make her an excellent shadow health secretary, and her personal experiences would be a lot more interesting and relevant. Anne Milton for Shadow Health!
Posted by: Kris F | July 06, 2006 at 12:31
Did he make a recovery?
Posted by: TaxCutter | July 06, 2006 at 13:23
Don't want to mention this but Mr Lansley's poor treatment by the NHS was at a time when there was a Conservative Government.;)
With regards to Liam Fox, actually I'm warming to the man, however he won't have practiced medicine for many years so I would see no benefit in him returning to Health because of his background as a doctor, I would have thought a man of his calibre would be good at the Home Office or Treasury though.
Posted by: Paul Kennedy | July 06, 2006 at 17:29
"I think Lansley definitely needs to be higher profile. This is ground we must fight on" 12:26
But we should have done in 2005, most of what is now happening in the NHS now, was known about by NHS insiders then, alas Iraq sidetracked most things and given Labour had got their patter well rehearsed on the subject they actually didn't mind too much.
Posted by: Paul Kennedy | July 06, 2006 at 17:33
PS to my 17:33 post, Agenda for Change is a total shambles, the duplication of effort across Trusts is a massive waste and has created an unbelievably low level of morale across the whole service.
Posted by: Paul Kennedy | July 06, 2006 at 17:39
I agree completely with verulamgal's 11.56 comment:
"Liam Fox was an excellent shadow health secretary.It's a pity he was moved. Personally I think health is a very important portfolio and we need some one like Dr Fox to cover health".
To take the NHS from where it is now and make it into a highly efficient service delivering high quality medical care nationwide requires someone of the highest calibre to lead it.
Liam Fox is a doctor, he has already researched the health services of some other European countries and he performed very strongly in the leadership contest.
This thread also underlines the more general point that we have to convince the electorate at some stage that we, as a party, are more capable than Nulab at actually managing big departments competently.
I haven't noticed that we have really addressed this rather fundamental issue at all.
Posted by: David Belchamber | July 06, 2006 at 18:07
Tim M, has A Lansley done an "any questions for.."?...
Posted by: Tory Solicitor | July 06, 2006 at 18:48
I did once sit through a Lansley speech at Conference. The guy next to me said it was a rum thing when the shadow health secretary's speech made you want to kill yourself.
Posted by: John Moss | July 07, 2006 at 12:00