General consensus seems to be if we win 250 plus that will be a good result.Less than 200 a bad night.After the way Labour have imploded we should expect to do well even if our campaign has been a bit lacklustre.
But I should add, it is going to be very difficult to tell, if the Labour vote utterly collapses and our vote holds firm, then we could be in for a particularly good night in certain places.
"But I should add, it is going to be very difficult to tell, if the Labour vote utterly collapses and our vote holds firm, then we could be in for a particularly good night in certain places."
Sounds about right, I may well be way off, but we'll see... things are not looking at all good for Labour in London which could provide 150 or even 200 gains for the party... hmmm... a long while to go before we find out though :)
My greatest hope is that we pickup Brooklands (in Manc) and we seem to stand a fair chance of doing so... but as i say we'll see when we see.
I'm gonna sit on the fence and say 225. About half way between a good and bad result. Whatever happens im sure the leadership will talk up the result anyway!
Remember that these are mainly Metropolitan areas (our worst battlegroung after Scotland) and secondly, we did well here last time out- it makes it harder this time. We can hardly expect much more. My concern is that we are hyping up our chances when the geography and timing is not in our favour and Labour will seize on it to twist it like they always do. I will be delighted with 100 gains.
Not many people will be satisfied with that Eugene.We would expect to make many gains in London and whilst 2002 was better than the previous two corresponding elections it was by no means a golden year.We MUST be able to win at least a few seats in Northern cities if we are to have any chance nationally and we must eclipse the Lib Dems.
Encouraging news - on the next general election betting odds, the longest odds on the Conservatives winning are now evens, whereas the longest odds on Labour winning are 21/20. As a result we now come above Labour on readabet.com's summary, for the first time. Coral and Sporting odds now have us as favourites, while some others have us tied with Labour. A good set of results tonight should see us as clear favourites. See for yourself:
The Guardian's analysis is that 250 + shows steady solid progress and 400+ is proof that the Tories are out of a trough.
Interestingly I recall the Tories did better in local elections under Hague and IDS than the media were predicting. I remember one under Hague where they gained 600+ seats when the media was saying 400 would be very good (I think those were the figures anyway. I seem to recall they were in the Telegraph). Sadly this didn't transform into a GE win.
In this case though the Tories have alrady benefitted from earlier victories during their time in opposition. This means they might be reaching saturation point.
BBC reports 'The number of postal vote applications in Birmingham has fallen from more than 70,000 in the general election of 2005 to fewer than 60,000 this year.
However, there are increases of up to 30% in five wards.
London investigation
In London, allegations of vote rigging have been made in seven of the 32 boroughs.'
Top be honest any result is reasonable where we don't lose seats. We are already the largest party in local government, and I doubt even Blair could spin Labour losing lots of seats to anyone as a sucess for Labour. I'm not caring about net gains, I want to see the national percentages...
The Sunday Times says that anything over 200 will allow Cameron to claim he has made a real difference. They were predicting around 100 net gains. I'll go for 246.
I'm going to be brave and go for 301 net gains as, if it comes true it means even the Grauniad will have to accept it's a good night for us (though they may wait for Labour to tell them how to spin this as a tory disaster).
Also all this stuff about good weather bringing out the Labour vote is a myth, I was first told it by my mum when my Dad was standing for the council in 1972; it wasn't true then and it isn't true now.
"Also all this stuff about good weather bringing out the Labour vote is a myth, I was first told it by my mum when my Dad was standing for the council in 1972; it wasn't true then and it isn't true now."
I hope you're right. I would be interested to know where the myth came from.
I have, 5 minutes ago, joined the Conservative party with an extra, yet modest, donation. Do I get a mug for this?
If Cameron pulls the Tory MEP's out of the EPP before 1.1.2007 I'll have to pay the Tory party £100, but I don't want a mug, just a group photo of Caroline Jackson, Ken Clarke and Tarzan's faces when they find out... :-)
Presumably we're talking overall gains here (rather than the number of new seats that we win, ignoring any losses)?
Posted by: Richard Weatherill | May 04, 2006 at 16:12
General consensus seems to be if we win 250 plus that will be a good result.Less than 200 a bad night.After the way Labour have imploded we should expect to do well even if our campaign has been a bit lacklustre.
Posted by: malcolm | May 04, 2006 at 16:26
Gain of 1798 seats
Posted by: Christina | May 04, 2006 at 16:26
Oops, meant to be 179 seats
Posted by: Christina | May 04, 2006 at 16:27
Only a very small net gain of around 20 seats.
Posted by: Rob Largan | May 04, 2006 at 16:30
The Tories will be lucky if they get anything close to 250. Cameron unfortunetely for him needs that or above to claim his leadership is taking hold.
Posted by: leon | May 04, 2006 at 16:31
But I should add, it is going to be very difficult to tell, if the Labour vote utterly collapses and our vote holds firm, then we could be in for a particularly good night in certain places.
Posted by: Rob Largan | May 04, 2006 at 16:31
Yes NET gains, RW. Valid entries must be received by 10pm.
Posted by: Editor | May 04, 2006 at 16:32
327 gains
Posted by: Bob | May 04, 2006 at 16:33
"But I should add, it is going to be very difficult to tell, if the Labour vote utterly collapses and our vote holds firm, then we could be in for a particularly good night in certain places."
Optimistic in my view but you could be right.
Posted by: leon | May 04, 2006 at 16:34
+350.
Sounds about right, I may well be way off, but we'll see... things are not looking at all good for Labour in London which could provide 150 or even 200 gains for the party... hmmm... a long while to go before we find out though :)
My greatest hope is that we pickup Brooklands (in Manc) and we seem to stand a fair chance of doing so... but as i say we'll see when we see.
Posted by: Ben | May 04, 2006 at 16:36
Problem is, in many wards were Labour will do badly it will be the Lib Dems not the Tories that will pick up the votes.
Posted by: leon | May 04, 2006 at 16:42
263 gains
Posted by: Andrew Woodman | May 04, 2006 at 16:43
402 seats - good luck to all candidates and activists!
Posted by: Ranting Guttersnipe | May 04, 2006 at 16:43
I'm gonna sit on the fence and say 225. About half way between a good and bad result. Whatever happens im sure the leadership will talk up the result anyway!
Posted by: Nick | May 04, 2006 at 16:44
277 net gains - hope it's more than that
Posted by: johnC | May 04, 2006 at 16:49
150 gains
Posted by: Matthew Oxley | May 04, 2006 at 16:51
204 for me please.
Posted by: Andy Dalton | May 04, 2006 at 16:54
236 net gains for me
Posted by: Robbo | May 04, 2006 at 16:55
144 for me but I would be delighted to be wrong.
Posted by: malcolm | May 04, 2006 at 16:57
Net Tory gains of 281. Lib Dems likely to be beneficiaries of Labour vote sinking in some of the urban areas I reckon.
Posted by: Edward Lennox | May 04, 2006 at 16:58
4361, hopefully.
Posted by: Deputy Editor | May 04, 2006 at 16:58
You're very bullish Sam,do you know something we don't?How about you Tim now you've got into betting with Chad how about chancing your arm?
Posted by: malcolm | May 04, 2006 at 17:02
Sorry Sam didn't realise the irony of your bullishness!
Posted by: malcolm | May 04, 2006 at 17:03
314 seats.
Posted by: Biodun | May 04, 2006 at 17:05
375 net gains
Posted by: Neville Cheek | May 04, 2006 at 17:09
OK Malcolm: I'm going to predict 342 gains (200 of them coming from London).
Posted by: Editor | May 04, 2006 at 17:11
Ever the optimist - 363 net gain
Posted by: brian | May 04, 2006 at 17:12
156
Posted by: RobC | May 04, 2006 at 17:12
384
Posted by: Ted | May 04, 2006 at 17:17
303 net gains. Heres to a good night for all our candidates.
Posted by: howard stevenson | May 04, 2006 at 17:17
Remember that these are mainly Metropolitan areas (our worst battlegroung after Scotland) and secondly, we did well here last time out- it makes it harder this time. We can hardly expect much more. My concern is that we are hyping up our chances when the geography and timing is not in our favour and Labour will seize on it to twist it like they always do. I will be delighted with 100 gains.
Posted by: eugene | May 04, 2006 at 17:18
316 net gains. (Labour lose 450+)
Posted by: Henry Cook | May 04, 2006 at 17:20
going for a middle of the road David Cameron style, 238
Posted by: Will B | May 04, 2006 at 17:22
Not many people will be satisfied with that Eugene.We would expect to make many gains in London and whilst 2002 was better than the previous two corresponding elections it was by no means a golden year.We MUST be able to win at least a few seats in Northern cities if we are to have any chance nationally and we must eclipse the Lib Dems.
Posted by: malcolm | May 04, 2006 at 17:23
374 net gains
Posted by: Gary Barford | May 04, 2006 at 17:24
Encouraging news - on the next general election betting odds, the longest odds on the Conservatives winning are now evens, whereas the longest odds on Labour winning are 21/20. As a result we now come above Labour on readabet.com's summary, for the first time. Coral and Sporting odds now have us as favourites, while some others have us tied with Labour. A good set of results tonight should see us as clear favourites. See for yourself:
http://readabet.bestbetting.com/Default.aspx?market=15989545
Sorry for going off topic, but I thought you'd like to know!
Posted by: Henry Cook | May 04, 2006 at 17:29
219 net gain, which would be a reasonable result.
Posted by: True Blue | May 04, 2006 at 17:29
186
Posted by: JT | May 04, 2006 at 17:29
325 net gains.
Posted by: Alastair Matlock | May 04, 2006 at 17:30
Curses the above 350 prediction already went. OK, 398. (Not a general posting return but I cannot resist chiming in).
Posted by: Suggestion | May 04, 2006 at 17:30
Great to hear from you Suggestion. Do come back properly... we all love you really!
And thanks, Henry. Your comment justifies a post and thread all of its own.
Posted by: Editor | May 04, 2006 at 17:33
So what about you Tim?
Posted by: malcolm | May 04, 2006 at 17:36
300+ assuming not too many Labour voters switch to the Lib Dems. I'd be happy with 250 though.
Posted by: Richard | May 04, 2006 at 17:39
I predicted at 17:11 Malcolm!
Posted by: Editor | May 04, 2006 at 17:39
Sorry must look more closely!
Posted by: malcolm | May 04, 2006 at 17:41
249 - an agonising one short of the magic 250!
Posted by: MattK | May 04, 2006 at 17:43
293 seats, here's hoping for more though.
Posted by: Matthew | May 04, 2006 at 17:54
110 gains
Posted by: Tim Aker | May 04, 2006 at 17:58
The Guardian's analysis is that 250 + shows steady solid progress and 400+ is proof that the Tories are out of a trough.
Interestingly I recall the Tories did better in local elections under Hague and IDS than the media were predicting. I remember one under Hague where they gained 600+ seats when the media was saying 400 would be very good (I think those were the figures anyway. I seem to recall they were in the Telegraph). Sadly this didn't transform into a GE win.
In this case though the Tories have alrady benefitted from earlier victories during their time in opposition. This means they might be reaching saturation point.
Posted by: Richard | May 04, 2006 at 18:10
BBC reports 'The number of postal vote applications in Birmingham has fallen from more than 70,000 in the general election of 2005 to fewer than 60,000 this year.
However, there are increases of up to 30% in five wards.
London investigation
In London, allegations of vote rigging have been made in seven of the 32 boroughs.'
Sounds like Labour are at it again.
Posted by: William | May 04, 2006 at 18:15
+83 seats
Posted by: Real Market | May 04, 2006 at 18:19
I seem to recall hearing somewhere that sunshine increases the number of Labour voters. I might have to lower my prediction to between 250 and 300.
Posted by: Richard | May 04, 2006 at 18:24
289 - including three from Slough one should be Adrian Hilton for whom I am knocking up by phone right now.
Posted by: Philip Dumville | May 04, 2006 at 18:31
I reckon 232.
Posted by: Alex Dawson | May 04, 2006 at 18:34
Do you win a prize if they make a net loss? If so my bet is a net loss of 30
Posted by: Steed | May 04, 2006 at 18:40
270
Top be honest any result is reasonable where we don't lose seats. We are already the largest party in local government, and I doubt even Blair could spin Labour losing lots of seats to anyone as a sucess for Labour. I'm not caring about net gains, I want to see the national percentages...
Posted by: Chris | May 04, 2006 at 18:48
shot in the dark... 275
Posted by: Daniel Vince-Archer | May 04, 2006 at 18:50
I agree with you Chris. I set out the real benchmarks for tonight yesterday. This is really just a bit of fun.
Posted by: Editor | May 04, 2006 at 18:56
188
Posted by: BW | May 04, 2006 at 19:01
Complete guess: 221
I hope for much more, but I think not.
Posted by: Voice from the South West | May 04, 2006 at 19:02
The Sunday Times says that anything over 200 will allow Cameron to claim he has made a real difference. They were predicting around 100 net gains. I'll go for 246.
Posted by: Peter Harrison | May 04, 2006 at 19:04
217
Posted by: Chris Barton | May 04, 2006 at 19:13
298 gains
Posted by: AC Fisher | May 04, 2006 at 19:26
+ 247
Posted by: TC | May 04, 2006 at 19:33
275 gains
Posted by: Nigel Clark | May 04, 2006 at 19:34
I'm going for 251
Posted by: EU Serf | May 04, 2006 at 19:34
113
Posted by: JonathanT | May 04, 2006 at 19:36
Impossible to say, I'm going for a hugely optimistic 405. Just say I'm hoping that the Cameron project is worth it.
Posted by: DavidB | May 04, 2006 at 19:46
wipeout for Labour
199 net gains for tories
300 net gains for libdems
500+ net labour losses
Posted by: steve e | May 04, 2006 at 19:48
I haven't much experience in these things, but 375 sounds as good a guess as any.
I'll be looking forward to the coverage.
Posted by: Stephen Alley | May 04, 2006 at 19:53
Oh, silly me, 375 has already been taken, I'll change to 328.
Posted by: Stephen Alley | May 04, 2006 at 19:56
Unfortunately the good weather means Labour will avoid meltdown and keep us below 200 gains. I'm going for 167.
Posted by: hayek's grandad | May 04, 2006 at 20:05
193 gains
Posted by: Henry Edward-Bancroft | May 04, 2006 at 20:09
324 seats.
Posted by: Dick Wishart | May 04, 2006 at 20:12
I have, 5 minutes ago, joined the Conservative party with an extra, yet modest, donation. Do I get a mug for this?
Posted by: Robbo | May 04, 2006 at 20:12
+ 247
Posted by: Jaz Hayre | May 04, 2006 at 20:13
I'm going to be brave and go for 301 net gains as, if it comes true it means even the Grauniad will have to accept it's a good night for us (though they may wait for Labour to tell them how to spin this as a tory disaster).
Also all this stuff about good weather bringing out the Labour vote is a myth, I was first told it by my mum when my Dad was standing for the council in 1972; it wasn't true then and it isn't true now.
Posted by: kingbongo | May 04, 2006 at 20:24
No mug, Robbo, but our respect! Welcome to the blue team.
Posted by: Editor | May 04, 2006 at 20:24
"Also all this stuff about good weather bringing out the Labour vote is a myth, I was first told it by my mum when my Dad was standing for the council in 1972; it wasn't true then and it isn't true now."
I hope you're right. I would be interested to know where the myth came from.
Posted by: Richard | May 04, 2006 at 20:33
456
Posted by: Bel | May 04, 2006 at 20:44
180
Posted by: Chad | May 04, 2006 at 20:55
227
Posted by: Nick | May 04, 2006 at 20:56
388
Posted by: EdR | May 04, 2006 at 21:09
The myth originated in the old days when it was the Tories who had more cars to get their voters to the polls in wet weather....
Posted by: BW | May 04, 2006 at 21:18
Net gain of 66
Posted by: Goldie | May 04, 2006 at 21:19
Things must be looking quite good, even Goldie's predicting tory gains!
Posted by: kingbongo | May 04, 2006 at 21:20
69 gains (ie. net)
Posted by: Chris Palmer | May 04, 2006 at 21:35
228 for a mug
Posted by: Mark Fulford | May 04, 2006 at 21:35
I have, 5 minutes ago, joined the Conservative party with an extra, yet modest, donation. Do I get a mug for this?
If Cameron pulls the Tory MEP's out of the EPP before 1.1.2007 I'll have to pay the Tory party £100, but I don't want a mug, just a group photo of Caroline Jackson, Ken Clarke and Tarzan's faces when they find out... :-)
Posted by: Chad | May 04, 2006 at 21:35
Everyone seems to be saying that turnout is high because of the good weather.
My opinion: if turnout reaches 40%, I'll eat my hat.
Prediction - 80 gains.
Posted by: Andy Stidwill | May 04, 2006 at 21:44
I will go for 420 gains.
Posted by: Noisy Summer | May 04, 2006 at 21:47
I am going to be uncharacteristically pessimistic - 127
Posted by: Martin Curtis | May 04, 2006 at 21:49
As I have to make an exact prediction to win a mug - 299
Posted by: Richard | May 04, 2006 at 21:51
254. At least. ;-)
Posted by: Tom Ainsworth | May 04, 2006 at 21:55
Voting has now closed at the polling stations and on this thread!
Posted by: Editor | May 04, 2006 at 22:01
176
Posted by: PassingThru | May 04, 2006 at 22:05
dang i shud read last comment!
Posted by: PassingThru | May 04, 2006 at 22:06
Do we get a special election results thread for the "live blogging" at 10PM?
Posted by: Richard | May 04, 2006 at 22:14
10 results declared already according to the BBC. That was quick!
Posted by: Richard | May 04, 2006 at 22:17