"The Board is the ultimate decision making body of the Conservative Party. It is responsible for all operational matters including; fundraising, membership and candidates. It is made up of representatives from each section of the Party - the voluntary, political and professional. It meets once a month and works closely with Conservative Central Office, elected representatives and the voluntary membership. The Board has a number of sub-committees, including membership, candidates and conferences."
That description of the Conservative Party Board appears on conservatives.com but there is nothing on the party's website about elections that are currently taking place to the Party Board. The Chairman and President's positions on the National Convention are unopposed but the places for three Vice Presidents are contested. Listed below are thumbnail profiles of the five candidates and, in the middle of the Jeremy Middleton profile, I've drawn attention to the fact that John Flack was an unambiguous clear supporter of last year's campaign to protect members' voting rights in the leadership election.
John Flack: "I am standing for election as one of the three Vice Presidents of the National Convention because I believe I offer a fresh approach and a fresh voice. I am a Campaigner at heart and want to help our Party Campaign more effectively. If elected my priorities as a member of the Party’s board will be:
- To help equip all Associations with modern I.T ….. and the skills to use it.
- To ensure views from all parts of the Country are heard at board level.
- To promote membership & registered supporters.
- To target resources most effectively to win elections
- To ensure our Candidates at all elections have the best support possible
Please also take a moment to look at my website. If you want to vote for change, if you want to vote for modern ideas with traditional values, if you want to vote to make campaigning a priority please give me one of your three votes."
Jeremy Middleton has not submitted a paragraph but has sent a pdf of his campaign messages. This highlights his support for abolishing the distinction between central and national members, the delivery of the blue chip replacement and the importance of local candidates. Jeremy, as a sitting member of the board, also responded directly to my question about membership participation in last year's leadership election (and in future leadership elections):
"I supported the board propsals last year. However the election process. turned out to be open, positive and exciting. It worked for us then and I therefore think we should stick with our current system. All methods of electing a leader carry risks but it would now take a lot to convince me to change it."
We also know that John Flack actively opposed last year's attempt to take the vote away from members and we know that Toby Vincent supported a reversal of the existing process whereby party members would reduce the slate of available leadership candidates to two and then MPs would decide between the two. This was first proposed by William Hague. I have not yet received anything from Simon Mort or Emma Pidding on where they stand on members' voting rights in the leadership election.
Simon Mort (the second sitting Board member): "You have asked me for a paragraph on why I should be re-elected... In a nutshell I have started, so please let me finish. I was elected by the voluntary party at Harrogate in March 2004. It was a high which exceeded even success in a parliamentary selection. I very much hope that I have never forgotten that the Voluntary Party gave me these responsibilities and they are my constituency. The glorious idiosyncrasies and differences between all parts of the country are reflected in our associations. These have to inform in party organisational structures, choice of candidate and every other respect of our political lives . My slogan for this campaign is Voluntary Party First Among Equals." Simon Mort's page on conservatives.com.
Emma Pidding: 'These are important elections at a time of change for our Party and it is vital that we have the strongest grass roots representation on the Board. You and I, the voluntary workers - the bedrock of our Party organisation - must ensure that our voices are heard and heeded. I believe that my experience and sound understanding of the voluntary party equip me to communicate our views with force and clarity. My belief is based on the experience I have gained in 20 years of working at most levels within the voluntary organisation. I am confident that I have the energy and determination to represent you on the Board, and to make our influence count. My objective is clear – not to pursue a Parliamentary career but to contribute with optimal effect at voluntary level. For more details on what I will work to achieve if elected, please take a look at my attached campaign message.'
Toby Vintcent - "founder of Geneva" (the CCHQ call centre) - submitted his campaign CV and a pdf of endorsements. One endorsement came from Rt Hon Michael Ancram MP: “I am happy to support Toby as I have long admired his contribution to the work of the Party. He has a natural feel for politics and great organisational skills and he would bring valuable campaigning experience to the Board at this crucial time.” Charles Tannock MEP said: "I have known Toby Vintcent for eight years when he skilfully chaired the London Region during my successful campaign for the European Parliament in 1999. He is charming, eloquent and of great integrity and has the required modern vision for our Conservative Party. I believe he will bring great value-added to the Conservative Party Board.”
Ballot papers for this election were mailed out in the last few days. About 900 local association chairmen plus regional and area officers are entitled to vote. You must contact them as soon as possible if you want your voice to be heard in this election.
The Chairman is elected??? Didnt Cameron pick him as Chairman...doesnt that mean that its not an elected position, its appointed by the Leader?
This election doesnt particularly excite me.
Posted by: James Maskell | March 24, 2006 at 11:25
Emnma Pidding has just emailed me this on the leadership process:
"With regards to the election of the Party Leader, I did support the line that was taken by Raymond Monbiot and Gavin Barwell. In my eyes, this system was far from ideal, and it was with much reluctance that supported a vote to take away the hard earned influence from the voluntary party. However, I did not believe that the system that had been used in 2001, which had resulted in the election of Iain Duncan Smith could be used again. The result of that election had proved to be disastrous for our Party - wasted months where the Party made no progress at all in increasing our electability in the eyes of the general public. It is clear; whichever Leader is chosen it is absolutely essential that the Members of Parliament are able to give them their support. In the case of the Iain Duncan Smith v. Kenneth Clarke election the MP’s very foolishly gave the voluntary party no real options in the choice of candidates. Had there been three candidates then perhaps the result would have been quite different?
I believe, that it was right for Michael Howard to seek to change the leadership election rules as soon as he was appointed as Leader, however he was strongly discouraged from doing so as we were very close to a likely General Election. In hindsight, this was a mistake. Michael Howard should have been allowed the opportunity to look at reforming the rules. I am sure though, if this had happened the media would have portrayed this internal debate as yet more ‘naval gazing’ by the Conservatives. They would have said that we are more interested in our own internal politics than in the real matter of how we govern the country.
When Michael Howard stood down straight after last year’s General Election, we were forced into the debate once again of how we should elect our Leader. This initially was part of a much wider remit – the thought provoking ‘21st Century Party’ discussion paper.
I attended 8 discussion meetings held by different Associations in my Area. I came away from each meeting with the clear understanding that the majority of the members that had attended felt that neither proposal for the election of Leader was ideal. This particular agenda item of the discussion paper was in the end decoupled from the rest of the consultation. Regrettably, the membership of the National Convention, were presented with two, in my view, imperfect options. To retain the status quo or to vote for a motion that was the total reversal of this. I felt some ‘half way house’ would be the better option.
As things worked out, the existing rules where maintained, and the leadership election was fought out on this criteria. What a positive exercise this proved to be!! (As is often said – hindsight is a wonderful thing!) There was still the possibility of a similar result as had occurred in 2001 being reached. I like to think that our Parliamentary colleagues had been the error of their ways, and they too like us, the voluntary members, realised they had to give the membership two acceptable candidates. Either of which, both the volunteers and the Parliamentarians could work with.
As I mentioned before I believe that the system does need to be reformed – it could fail us again as it did in 2001. We should look at all options. I have a completely open mind to this. Perhaps as I suggested earlier we need to have a wider choice of candidates being put before the membership for the final vote, or we look at the voluntary party having the first ‘say’ and then giving the Parliamentary Party the final ‘say’ from a short list that we draw up.
I am fully aware that Lord Hodgson worked extremely hard to gain us, the voluntary party, a right to have a say in choosing our Leader, but as we saw in 2001 this can produce a very unsatisfactory result. We need to ensure that this does not happen again.
If elected to the Board, I would work hard to get this debate brought to the table again, sooner rather than later, I want to see a system that is fair and transparent – not having too much power in one arena. Whatever decision/resolution is reached it must have the backing of both the volunteers and the Parliamentary Party. I will seek to achieve this, and will most definitely seek the advice and views of all sections of the voluntary party that I represent in doing so."
Posted by: Editor | March 24, 2006 at 11:25
Replace "him" with "Francis Maude" that is...far too early for me to be online!
Posted by: James Maskell | March 24, 2006 at 11:26
I intend to ring my Association Office NOW and encourage my Chairman to vote John Flack, Jeremy Middleton (a repenting sinner)and Toby Vintcent. I do not want to be represented by people who wanted to disenfranchise me in the choice of Party Leader.
Posted by: CCHQ Spy | March 24, 2006 at 11:28
I would also urge anyone with a vote who sees this site to vote for John Flack in particular.The campaign for member disenfranchisement for choosing the leader must be one of the most lamentable political political campaigns in recent years.Not only was it wrong (in my opinion)in principle it was so badly argued that I doubt any neutral observer would have been persuaded to support the proposals.
I also doubt whether those who supported disenfranchisement have the first idea of how to rebuild and enthuse a mass membership party and certainly should not be voted onto its board.
Posted by: malcolm | March 24, 2006 at 12:00
John Flack would be an absolutely excellent board member. Will stand up for the rights of voluntary members but in a constructive manner, always putting the best interests of the Party at heart.
If I were a member of the Party I would encourage my chairman to vote for John.
Posted by: Louise | March 24, 2006 at 12:05
Simon Mort should be supported enthusiastically. He has worked tirelessly for members since being elected two years ago.
Posted by: Derek Green | March 24, 2006 at 13:36
Ms Emma needs to learn to be a little more concise.
Posted by: Richard Bailey | March 24, 2006 at 13:46
I strongly recommend that Emma Pidding be supported. Her straight talking manner will only strengthen all associations.
Posted by: Laura Coomber | March 24, 2006 at 13:50
I think Emma Pidding will make an excellent board member.
I met her at the conference last year and was impressed with her positive attitude.
She is definitely a winner and stands up for grass roots.
Posted by: clare noden | March 24, 2006 at 13:58
This explains why 'vote Flack' ads keep appearing on my blog. Makes a change from the 'Chris2Win' ads that kept appearing for ages after the LD leadership contest finished.
Posted by: Daniel Vince-Archer | March 24, 2006 at 14:07
I will be supporting Toby Vintcent in these elections and urging my friends to do likewise.
The Board has considerable residual powers under the Party Constitution and if these are not used sensibly - or not used at all - then our campaigning machine will grind to a halt and no amount of relaunches will save it.
Toby has the political insight and ability to know that 'modernisation' really means professionalising our approach in a way which respects members and associations and takes them with you. He actually has a track record in this area - look at the extraordinary success of his Geneva project.
He was an excellent London Regional Chairman; he will make an excellent Vice President; he has the right ideas for how to take our organisation forward.
Posted by: William Norton | March 24, 2006 at 14:11
I wonder how long John Flack will stay around once he gets elected as an MEP or a parliamentary candidate?
I do not believe that this is a healthy position to be in for an individual who needs to concentrate on representing the Voluntary party on the board.
We need individuals who will be able to concentrate on representing the Voluntary party at Board level throughout the elected period. I will certainly encouraging my Chairman to vote for Simon Mort, Emma Pidding and Middleton.
Posted by: Hossain S | March 24, 2006 at 14:25
I have no doubt that all the candidates are worthy - however as a campaigner and husband of a Fast Track candidate I am looking for action not words. Toby Vincent gets my vote on a number of counts - but anyone looking for just one needs to realise that without Toby I believe Geneva would never have happened.
He is a campaigner - not a "politician" - A doer not a talker and I for one believe that is what is needed.
Mark Fullbrook
Posted by: Mark Fullbrook | March 24, 2006 at 14:55
I would never vote for anyone who advocated taking the vote away from the membership, the very same membership they claim to represent,the pressure our supposed representatives on the board put us under to vote for the change last year, was, quite frankly a disgrace.
I would urge all of those with a vote to wait for those candidates who have not yet responded to the question asked by conservative home to wait until they do so before casting your own vote.
A no response is in my opinion a no vote.
Posted by: dickwishart | March 24, 2006 at 15:01
Emma Pidding get my vote: A great asset to have on the Board representing grass roots.
Posted by: ChrisW | March 24, 2006 at 15:07
The method of selecting the Leader was last year's issue. More important for the year to come is candidates' views on the Board's proposed changes to membership and affiliation fees. This is an issue on which they will be required to make a decision soon after being elected and which will have a major impact on the voluntary party.
Posted by: Richard ROBINSON | March 24, 2006 at 15:27
Emma Pidding will definitely get my vote. She is a worker who gets things done and who represents the peolpe who tread the streets!
Posted by: Tony Kenyon | March 24, 2006 at 15:44
To answer James Maskall's point, the chairman of the National Convention is a different post to the chairman of the Party, who is Francis Maude, and is appointed. The NC chairman is currently Raymond Monbiot, who will be replaced by Stephen Castle.
A agree with Richard Robinson that we need to look at the views of our Board members on a range of important issues on fundraising and candidate selection, the freedom of associations etc.
Posted by: Derek | March 24, 2006 at 15:59
Emma Pidding was a brilliant Chairman of Chesham & Amersham Association and negotiated the very successful twinning arrangement with Beaconsfield. She deserves to be elected.
Posted by: Philip Dumville | March 24, 2006 at 16:46
Excuse my suspicious, cynical mind, but I do find it rather odd how a host of people who have previously not commented on this blog have emerged from the undergrowth to ramp Emma Pidding on this thread today.
Posted by: Daniel Vince-Archer | March 24, 2006 at 16:48
It's good to have all of these new names posting on the site about Emma Pidding. A warm welcome to you all and I hope you all visit again soon!
The one person I definitely would like to see on the Board is John Flack. John was an enthusiastic and uncomprising champion of the right of members to have a say in last year's leadership election and we need such an uncompromising voice for members on the Board.
Posted by: Editor | March 24, 2006 at 16:50
I know some of you will think this is boringly predictable of me, but...
Isn't this Board 'hideously white'? Why hasn't Maude got a token Asian to be the Board's 'diversity advisor'?
The newly-welcomed Chisti, I think, would make an excellent candidate...
There's probably a gay and a disabled representantive already on the Board (laws of statistics), but in the absence of a black/Asian candidate, I guess the woman must be preferred.
I don't mean this to sound offensive, but this is exactly the sort of reasoning the Board ought to apply to ITSELF before imposing it on the parliamentary party - then they might see what an utterly unacceptable policy it is.
Posted by: Nadim | March 24, 2006 at 16:57
As a long-standing, if infrequent, poster of comments on this site, I'd like to put in a word for Emma P, who runs part of my euro-region. She is bubbly and jolly and hard-working and clever. No one has put me up to posting this; she happens to be a very good egg and, in a strong field, would get my support.
Posted by: Daniel Hannan | March 24, 2006 at 17:00
I agree with Dick Wishart's comment earlier that the vote last year over the Leadership election was a defining moment. Does anyone seriously believe now that it would have been the right thing to have stripped members of their voting rights?
Democracy never fails, only the candidates. Competitive elections give vigour to an organisation and bring people into it. Look at all the new contributors we've had on this thread today, for instance.
The Board will need robust people on it who won't shy away from plain speaking either to the Centre or in enforcing the line with associations. There are still difficult internal organisation questions ahead and I'd like people on the Board who can be relied on to approach them in the correct spirit.
John Flack was very robust last year in the defence of Party democracy. He called it right on that question, when others were having trouble seeing things as clearly or concisely. I'll back his judgment. John Flack gets one of my votes.
Posted by: William Norton | March 24, 2006 at 17:30
Emma Pidding excellent candidate to stand for the Board.
Intelligent
Decisive
Open-minded
Young
Positive and
Dynamic.
For once the party seems to be putting forward the right type of candidates.
As for Daniel V's comments, obviously you have no idea what a brilliant and dynamic person Emma Pidding is.
Posted by: Christopher Coomber | March 24, 2006 at 17:57
Completely unprompted, and without in any way being able to read her handwriting, I would like to say that I will be voting for my wife, Lady Gwendolene de Vere Spoofington.
Gwennie has a PhD in nanotechnology, is a world-class Olympic shot-putter, runs an animal sanctuary in her spare time, and is about to find a cure for cancer. All of my tenants like her, and she is very good with the domestic staff.
She also does a pretty mean impression of a Gresley pre-war steam locomotive going through a tunnel.
What more could any one want in a member of the Board of the Conservative Party? It beggars belief that anyone is standing against her.
Posted by: Sir Buffy de Vere Spoofington, Bt | March 24, 2006 at 18:17
The Board will need robust people on it who won't shy away from plain speaking either to the Centre or in enforcing the line with associations. There are still difficult internal organisation questions ahead and I'd like people on the Board who can be relied on to approach them in the correct spirit.
Well, how can I possibly follow that? I haven't spent much time looking at these candidates yet, but they all appear to be thorough, committed campaigners with a very professional approach. We are indeed lucky to have such a talented field of volunteers standing for the Party Board.
We need people who push change through, who get things done, and have a commitment to refocussing the party in country on campaigning. Likewise, we need similar qualities of leadership at a local Association level and in other Party organisations, too.
Posted by: Richard Carey | March 24, 2006 at 20:45
Well, how can I possibly follow that?
If that read a little strangely, I was probably distracted by Sir Buffy de Something-or-other above!!
Posted by: Richard Carey | March 24, 2006 at 20:46
Excuse my ignorance, but who gets a vote in this election? Ordinary party members don't, so I'm assuming its just officers. If it's just officers, how many of those either know of this site or take any notice of opinion expressed on it?
I'm not sure of the point of the thread, or the campaign on it being waged by Emma Pidding. It's not really going to shift opinion, so aren't efforts a bit misdirected?
PS
I still think it's 'hideously white'.
Posted by: Nadim | March 24, 2006 at 22:17
I have worked with Jeremy Middleton both before and since he became a member of the Board and i must commend him to all as an excellent candidate. I will certainly be voting for him. Simon Mort has impressed me when i have met with him, but that has not been so often as to secure my full support. Although i am warm towards him i will have to see what he puts forward in his speech this time round. The others i dont know, i guess time will tell and i look forward to seeing what they have to say at National Convention in Manchester shortly.
Posted by: James Wharton | March 25, 2006 at 00:16
I'd like to know the opinion of all these people towards the upcoming changes in membership rules which in many cases will asset strip associations finances leaving them weakened.
For instance a compulsory £5 per member levy to CCHQ in many instances may mean cutbacks in local staffing, less ability to campaign locally and no discretion to 'punish' CCHQ when it behaves irresponsibly by hiring, firing and paying to gag former staffers.
The recent scandal over Steve Hilton deserves addressing by all these people. Are they concerned that a colleague (or crony?)of the Leader has been vested with such an remuneration package whilst being unaccountable to party?
Put simply is the Leader the sole proprietor of the party with unlimited discretion to appoint, remove and restructure staff at a whim? Or will the Board stand up and be counted to defend the entire Party structure - not just that element based in 25 Victoria St?
Posted by: Old Hack | March 25, 2006 at 09:38
Old Hack, It seems to me that at a time we're supposed to promoting a localism agenda, we are within our own party, centralising more and more. First on candidate selection and now, being asked to pump more and more money into the financial black hole which is CCO. Elections in marginal seats will be won by well funded local associations promting the party message on the ground. Not by dog whistling billboard adverts.
Posted by: Andrew Woodman | March 25, 2006 at 11:14
When are the elections where we can get rid of Francis Maude?
Posted by: Chris Palmer | March 26, 2006 at 22:09
During the consultation on the method of electing the Leader, I heard it frequently argued that it would be more important for the membership to elect the Chairman of the Party. Personally, I think Francis is doing a good job, but I'd be happy to argue that case before the membership and live by their judgement.
Posted by: Richard ROBINSON | March 28, 2006 at 09:21
I would be inclined to support the candidate who was prepared to let all members of the party vote - and not just the association chairman. If all members are entitled to vote for the political leadership then so they should with the Board. It is a relatively simple matter to send these details out to everyone with a brief CV and intention. Expensive, yes. Make it last for x number of years. I would not, under any circumstances support Simon Mort for his advocacy of the members losing their vote last year. He stood up at a meeting in Devon and assured me that only 5% of the party felt the way that I did - ie wanting the membership to retain the vote. If he got that so wrong, why would I have any confidence on any other judgements he might make?
Marjorie Bailey
Posted by: Marjorie Bailey | March 31, 2006 at 14:40
Both Simon Mort and Emma Pidding bring refreshing clarity to the political process. Having seen them both in action over a number of years they have vitality, enthusiasm, knowledge and above all practical rather than theoretical experience. Combined with their straight-talking attitude, these are attributes the Board and Party need.
Posted by: David Kirchheimer | April 03, 2006 at 09:27
As an area officer of the party I am obviously lucky in that over time I have met all of the candidates and so been able to form an impression of them all. As such I have to say that they are all high quality people with the skills and attributes to be good board members and so in many ways the question for those of us with a vote, and yes I do have one, is whether they agree with the views of that candidate regarding the voice of the membership in the leadership election process.
Posted by: Matt Davis | September 18, 2006 at 18:09
If Emma is intelligent she goes to great lengths to disguise it in her verbiage above.
Simon's words, although mercifully shorter, were equally vacuous. The fact that he wanted to remove our right to choose the leader makes him totally unelectable in my view.
I want the Board to have people who are going to help transform our dysfunctional, complacent and ineffectual party machine into the best campaigning organisation in the world. That will mean they will need vision, courage and organisational and leadership skills. Toby Vincent seems to be head and shoulders above the rest on those qualities (and no, I don't know him, have never met him and haven't been put up to it) while John Flack looks pretty good to.
Conservative Home is making a real difference by making sure elections like this get to be known about by people like me who have no vote.
Posted by: Off Message | September 29, 2006 at 13:39
Adult Voyeur - World Wide Wives has everything for the Voyeur enthusiast, free voyeur pictures, voyeur videos,
and real life profiles of women and men from around the world
Posted by: Gorrdon | November 17, 2008 at 01:58
The best for work, rest and home you will find on our web-portal - [url=http://www.ispolkom.com]www.ispolkom.com[/url]. A lot of stores, gifts, programs and thousands of name brands!
We glad to offer you both own development and the best to opinion of our analysts that is presented by other companies.
We all time work above yours desires and we shall try to give to you the best choice.
Now you should not be engaged in search the Internet any more...we have everything...
Best wishes,
administration
Posted by: ispolkom | February 04, 2009 at 14:58
I totally agree with you
Posted by: Max | June 19, 2009 at 14:58
http://film21st.com is your cinema at home
film21st.com
- Watch online the lost and latest films.
-Download all films, just one click.
-watch movie with full screen mode and hight quality.
-mail your best films to your friends and lovers for just one click
-rich gallery daily and always updating
N.B. Ask for any film and we brought to you befor blink your eye
Thakns to visit us at http://www.film21st.com
Posted by: jichfounakouchi | October 24, 2009 at 02:18
—авелию, нужны деньги на операцию.
ћаленькому —авелию ¬аськину срочно требуетс€ помощь.
ћалыш, которому всего два с половиной года, находитс€ в т€желом состо€нии
в реанимации одной из больниц ѕерьми. ≈го жизнь висит на волоске: обе почки
у ребенка не работают. —авелий продолжает жить благодар€ дорогосто€щим
лекарствам, помощи врачей и огромному желанию близких спасти малыша.
ƒл€ проведени€ дорогосто€щей операции по пересадке почки в √ермании
(город Єльн) или »зраиле нужны немалые деньги Ц 12 тыс€ч евро.
ƒо конца €нвар€ 2011 их нужно перечислит клиники. —авушка и его мама
≈лена будут благодарны каждому откликнувшемус€ за любую помощь.
–еквизиты дл€ перечислени€:
Web Money:
–убли: R412279514239
USD: Z175706098589
яндекс-деньги: 41001813600163
==========================================================================
—авелию, money for operation are necessary.
Small —авелию ¬аськину the help urgently is required.
The kid to whom only two and a half a year, is in a grave condition
In resuscitation of one of hospitals Permi. His life hangs by a thread: both kidneys
For the child do not work. —авелий continues to live thanks to the expensive
To medicines, the help of doctors and huge desire of relatives to rescue the kid.
For carrying out of expensive operation on kidney change in Germany
(City of Cologne) or Israel considerable money - 12 thousand euro is necessary.
Till the end of January of 2011 them it is necessary will list clinics. —авушка and his mother
Elena will be grateful to everyone responded for any help.
Requisites for transfer:
Web Money:
Roubles: R412279514239
USD: Z175706098589
Yandex-money: 41001813600163
Posted by: AnnaDyageleva82 | December 21, 2010 at 15:53
—авелию, нужны деньги на операцию.
ћаленькому —авелию ¬аськину срочно требуетс€ помощь.
ћалыш, которому всего два с половиной года, находитс€ в т€желом состо€нии
в реанимации одной из больниц ѕерьми. ≈го жизнь висит на волоске: обе почки
у ребенка не работают. —авелий продолжает жить благодар€ дорогосто€щим
лекарствам, помощи врачей и огромному желанию близких спасти малыша.
ƒл€ проведени€ дорогосто€щей операции по пересадке почки в √ермании
(город Єльн) или »зраиле нужны немалые деньги Ц 12 тыс€ч евро.
ƒо конца €нвар€ 2011 их нужно перечислит клиники. —авушка и его мама
≈лена будут благодарны каждому откликнувшемус€ за любую помощь.
–еквизиты дл€ перечислени€:
Web Money:
–убли: R412279514239
USD: Z175706098589
яндекс-деньги: 41001813600163
==========================================================================
—авелию, money for operation are necessary.
Small —авелию ¬аськину the help urgently is required.
The kid to whom only two and a half a year, is in a grave condition
In resuscitation of one of hospitals Permi. His life hangs by a thread: both kidneys
For the child do not work. —авелий continues to live thanks to the expensive
To medicines, the help of doctors and huge desire of relatives to rescue the kid.
For carrying out of expensive operation on kidney change in Germany
(City of Cologne) or Israel considerable money - 12 thousand euro is necessary.
Till the end of January of 2011 them it is necessary will list clinics. —авушка and his mother
Elena will be grateful to everyone responded for any help.
Requisites for transfer:
Web Money:
Roubles: R412279514239
USD: Z175706098589
Yandex-money: 41001813600163
Posted by: AnnaDyageleva82 | December 21, 2010 at 15:53
—авелию, нужны деньги на операцию.
ћаленькому —авелию ¬аськину срочно требуетс€ помощь.
ћалыш, которому всего два с половиной года, находитс€ в т€желом состо€нии
в реанимации одной из больниц ѕерьми. ≈го жизнь висит на волоске: обе почки
у ребенка не работают. —авелий продолжает жить благодар€ дорогосто€щим
лекарствам, помощи врачей и огромному желанию близких спасти малыша.
ƒл€ проведени€ дорогосто€щей операции по пересадке почки в √ермании
(город Єльн) или »зраиле нужны немалые деньги Ц 12 тыс€ч евро.
ƒо конца €нвар€ 2011 их нужно перечислит клиники. —авушка и его мама
≈лена будут благодарны каждому откликнувшемус€ за любую помощь.
–еквизиты дл€ перечислени€:
Web Money:
–убли: R412279514239
USD: Z175706098589
яндекс-деньги: 41001813600163
==========================================================================
—авелию, money for operation are necessary.
Small —авелию ¬аськину the help urgently is required.
The kid to whom only two and a half a year, is in a grave condition
In resuscitation of one of hospitals Permi. His life hangs by a thread: both kidneys
For the child do not work. —авелий continues to live thanks to the expensive
To medicines, the help of doctors and huge desire of relatives to rescue the kid.
For carrying out of expensive operation on kidney change in Germany
(City of Cologne) or Israel considerable money - 12 thousand euro is necessary.
Till the end of January of 2011 them it is necessary will list clinics. —авушка and his mother
Elena will be grateful to everyone responded for any help.
Requisites for transfer:
Web Money:
Roubles: R412279514239
USD: Z175706098589
Yandex-money: 41001813600163
Posted by: AnnaDyageleva82 | December 21, 2010 at 15:54
—авелию, нужны деньги на операцию.
ћаленькому —авелию ¬аськину срочно требуетс€ помощь.
ћалыш, которому всего два с половиной года, находитс€ в т€желом состо€нии
в реанимации одной из больниц ѕерьми. ≈го жизнь висит на волоске: обе почки
у ребенка не работают. —авелий продолжает жить благодар€ дорогосто€щим
лекарствам, помощи врачей и огромному желанию близких спасти малыша.
ƒл€ проведени€ дорогосто€щей операции по пересадке почки в √ермании
(город Єльн) или »зраиле нужны немалые деньги Ц 12 тыс€ч евро.
ƒо конца €нвар€ 2011 их нужно перечислит клиники. —авушка и его мама
≈лена будут благодарны каждому откликнувшемус€ за любую помощь.
–еквизиты дл€ перечислени€:
Web Money:
–убли: R412279514239
USD: Z175706098589
яндекс-деньги: 41001813600163
==========================================================================
—авелию, money for operation are necessary.
Small —авелию ¬аськину the help urgently is required.
The kid to whom only two and a half a year, is in a grave condition
In resuscitation of one of hospitals Permi. His life hangs by a thread: both kidneys
For the child do not work. —авелий continues to live thanks to the expensive
To medicines, the help of doctors and huge desire of relatives to rescue the kid.
For carrying out of expensive operation on kidney change in Germany
(City of Cologne) or Israel considerable money - 12 thousand euro is necessary.
Till the end of January of 2011 them it is necessary will list clinics. —авушка and his mother
Elena will be grateful to everyone responded for any help.
Requisites for transfer:
Web Money:
Roubles: R412279514239
USD: Z175706098589
Yandex-money: 41001813600163
Posted by: AnnaDyageleva82 | December 21, 2010 at 15:54
—авелию, нужны деньги на операцию.
ћаленькому —авелию ¬аськину срочно требуетс€ помощь.
ћалыш, которому всего два с половиной года, находитс€ в т€желом состо€нии
в реанимации одной из больниц ѕерьми. ≈го жизнь висит на волоске: обе почки
у ребенка не работают. —авелий продолжает жить благодар€ дорогосто€щим
лекарствам, помощи врачей и огромному желанию близких спасти малыша.
ƒл€ проведени€ дорогосто€щей операции по пересадке почки в √ермании
(город Єльн) или »зраиле нужны немалые деньги Ц 12 тыс€ч евро.
ƒо конца €нвар€ 2011 их нужно перечислит клиники. —авушка и его мама
≈лена будут благодарны каждому откликнувшемус€ за любую помощь.
–еквизиты дл€ перечислени€:
Web Money:
–убли: R412279514239
USD: Z175706098589
яндекс-деньги: 41001813600163
==========================================================================
—авелию, money for operation are necessary.
Small —авелию ¬аськину the help urgently is required.
The kid to whom only two and a half a year, is in a grave condition
In resuscitation of one of hospitals Permi. His life hangs by a thread: both kidneys
For the child do not work. —авелий continues to live thanks to the expensive
To medicines, the help of doctors and huge desire of relatives to rescue the kid.
For carrying out of expensive operation on kidney change in Germany
(City of Cologne) or Israel considerable money - 12 thousand euro is necessary.
Till the end of January of 2011 them it is necessary will list clinics. —авушка and his mother
Elena will be grateful to everyone responded for any help.
Requisites for transfer:
Web Money:
Roubles: R412279514239
USD: Z175706098589
Yandex-money: 41001813600163
Posted by: AnnaDyageleva82 | December 21, 2010 at 15:54
—авелию, нужны деньги на операцию.
ћаленькому —авелию ¬аськину срочно требуетс€ помощь.
ћалыш, которому всего два с половиной года, находитс€ в т€желом состо€нии
в реанимации одной из больниц ѕерьми. ≈го жизнь висит на волоске: обе почки
у ребенка не работают. —авелий продолжает жить благодар€ дорогосто€щим
лекарствам, помощи врачей и огромному желанию близких спасти малыша.
ƒл€ проведени€ дорогосто€щей операции по пересадке почки в √ермании
(город Єльн) или »зраиле нужны немалые деньги Ц 12 тыс€ч евро.
ƒо конца €нвар€ 2011 их нужно перечислит клиники. —авушка и его мама
≈лена будут благодарны каждому откликнувшемус€ за любую помощь.
–еквизиты дл€ перечислени€:
Web Money:
–убли: R412279514239
USD: Z175706098589
яндекс-деньги: 41001813600163
==========================================================================
—авелию, money for operation are necessary.
Small —авелию ¬аськину the help urgently is required.
The kid to whom only two and a half a year, is in a grave condition
In resuscitation of one of hospitals Permi. His life hangs by a thread: both kidneys
For the child do not work. —авелий continues to live thanks to the expensive
To medicines, the help of doctors and huge desire of relatives to rescue the kid.
For carrying out of expensive operation on kidney change in Germany
(City of Cologne) or Israel considerable money - 12 thousand euro is necessary.
Till the end of January of 2011 them it is necessary will list clinics. —авушка and his mother
Elena will be grateful to everyone responded for any help.
Requisites for transfer:
Web Money:
Roubles: R412279514239
USD: Z175706098589
Yandex-money: 41001813600163
Posted by: AnnaDyageleva82 | December 21, 2010 at 15:55
—авелию, нужны деньги на операцию.
ћаленькому —авелию ¬аськину срочно требуетс€ помощь.
ћалыш, которому всего два с половиной года, находитс€ в т€желом состо€нии
в реанимации одной из больниц ѕерьми. ≈го жизнь висит на волоске: обе почки
у ребенка не работают. —авелий продолжает жить благодар€ дорогосто€щим
лекарствам, помощи врачей и огромному желанию близких спасти малыша.
ƒл€ проведени€ дорогосто€щей операции по пересадке почки в √ермании
(город Єльн) или »зраиле нужны немалые деньги Ц 12 тыс€ч евро.
ƒо конца €нвар€ 2011 их нужно перечислит клиники. —авушка и его мама
≈лена будут благодарны каждому откликнувшемус€ за любую помощь.
–еквизиты дл€ перечислени€:
Web Money:
–убли: R412279514239
USD: Z175706098589
яндекс-деньги: 41001813600163
==========================================================================
—авелию, money for operation are necessary.
Small —авелию ¬аськину the help urgently is required.
The kid to whom only two and a half a year, is in a grave condition
In resuscitation of one of hospitals Permi. His life hangs by a thread: both kidneys
For the child do not work. —авелий continues to live thanks to the expensive
To medicines, the help of doctors and huge desire of relatives to rescue the kid.
For carrying out of expensive operation on kidney change in Germany
(City of Cologne) or Israel considerable money - 12 thousand euro is necessary.
Till the end of January of 2011 them it is necessary will list clinics. —авушка and his mother
Elena will be grateful to everyone responded for any help.
Requisites for transfer:
Web Money:
Roubles: R412279514239
USD: Z175706098589
Yandex-money: 41001813600163
Posted by: AnnaDyageleva82 | December 21, 2010 at 15:55