How is David Cameron doing?
Is modernisation going too fast? Too slowly?
What do you think of William Hague's performance?
What do you think of the new policy on grammar schools?
The ConservativeHome.com Members' Panel site is loaded up with a new set of questions and is waiting to hear from you. Click here to record your views.
Done and Done.
Posted by: James Maskell | January 18, 2006 at 20:34
This survey has reminded me that David Cameron's colleagues have been largely anonymous in the last six weeks. I can't fault the leader for his industry, but perhaps Davis, Fox, Clarke and others should have been given the chance to show that we're not a one man band.
Posted by: john Skinner | January 18, 2006 at 23:40
I agree, the same thought occured to me too, I ended up putting midly satisfied for most of them because I hadnt heard thier name since.
I think the leadership election really brought out the best in Liam Fox, David Davis clearly connects with some too while George Osbourne saw his profile increase. While these faces are fresh in the minds of the public we are missing a chance if we do not give them some publicity.
I like the mention from somebody earlier about how we may end up changing our name to 'Cameron's Conservatives', as funny as this would be it would obviously be dangerous.
The challenge, I guess is making sure we maximise publicity to Cameron himself who is our best asset at this time, while also giving some coverage to the likes of Fox etc to go further on content.
Posted by: Matthew Oxley | January 18, 2006 at 23:52
I was ver pleased when we saw the two Davids on the news again for the police reform policy...
Brings a smile to your face. I think Cameron should have a 3-man team. Cameron-Davis-Osbourne..to tackle the Blair-Brown.
Posted by: Jaz | January 19, 2006 at 01:15
I think it should be Fox instead of Davis, Polls showed just before the 3rd round result that Fox was more popular with members as Davis was a dead man walking.
Davis has a place of course, but Fox is one of our brightest, experienced and youngest (thats not a contradiction) MP's.
Posted by: Matthew Oxley | January 19, 2006 at 01:31
Well said, I Couldn't agree more Matthew!
Posted by: VIC | January 19, 2006 at 02:45
Letwin should be kept in the back office
Posted by: john Skinner | January 19, 2006 at 10:14