The Treasury dislikes HS2. Labour is equivocal. Tory backbench opposition could kill it off.
By Paul Goodman
Follow Paul on Twitter.
When David Cameron, Nick Clegg and George Osborne all rally round HS2 within the space of a few days, you know that it may never leave the station. Alistair Darling and Peter Mandelson have come out against the plan. Owen Paterson is said to be doubtful, and determined to kill it. The CBI is equivocal. However, the biggest threat to the project comes in a pincer movement from Labour's front bench and the Treasury. Ed Balls could make great play of the billions of pounds which cancellation would allow him to spend elsewhere - however ropey such calculations may be. And Nick Macpherson, the Treasury's Permanent Secretary, said earlier this week that the scheme may be scrapped after all: he was reflecting the Treasury's institutional resistance to its rising costs.
I am less convinced than some that rail is finished as a means of transport - in the medium-term, at least. But the case against HS2 is strong. If one doesn't believe in high speed rail at all, it follows that the £50 billion that will be spent on the plan (or whatever the sum eventually turns out to be) would be better spent on other communications projects - including high speed broadband as well as rail. And if one does believe in high speed rail in principle, it makes no sense to plan the HS2 route first and airport expansion later. Furthermore, no convincing and consistent business case has been made for it. To date, most Conservative MPs have left HS2 well alone: opposition to it consists of an alliance of those whose constituencies are affected plus some fiscal hawks. The scheme will grind on, in the short-term at least. But a increase in the number of its Commons critics could bring it to a halt.
Comments