Conservative Diary

« 50 per cent of Conservatives support the legal regulation or decriminalisation of cannabis – now where’s that review? | Main | The OBR doesn’t get everything right – but it’s still one of Osborne’s most important innovations »

David Cameron attacks Hilary Mantel’s “attack” on Kate Middleton – and is rightly attacked himself

By Peter Hoskin
Follow Peter on Twitter

Just give me a few minutes while I read Hilary Mantel’s essay on the monarchy—transliterated from a speech she gave two weeks ago—for the London Review of Books…

…okay, I’ve done that now. Let’s talk.

It’s true that the essay puts the words “Kate Middleton” in close proximity to some rather severe descriptions, such as “jointed doll on which certain rags are hung” and “painfully thin” and “perfect plastic smile”. These descriptions are what have got the Daily Mail so upset.

But, when you read the essay in full, it’s clear that Mantel intends far more kindness to the Duchess than cruelty. Her overarching point seems to be that this is how we—the media mostly, and the public—regard our Royals; as subjects of flimsy fascination, to be loved, hated or derided based on superficialities. I mean, the essay even concludes with the line, “I’m asking us to back off and not be brutes”. This is an outpouring of great sympathy.

Which is one reason why David Cameron’s remarks on the subject—delivered from India—are not entirely welcome. “I think she writes great books,” he said of Mantel to the BBC, “but I think what she’s said about Kate Middleton is completely misguided, completely wrong.” And then he went on to praise the Princess as a “fantastic ambassador for Britain”. Sadly, none of this creates the impression that Mr Cameron has actually read the essay in the first place.

But there’s another reason, too, and it’s one captured by Tom Chivers in a punchy blog-post this afternoon: should a Prime Minister really be commenting on stuff like this, particularly when he’s half-way through an important trip to India? Politicians do not have to comment on everything, even when journalists press them to. As Chivers says, there’s always the option—albeit rarely used— of saying “I have no idea and I don’t care”.

The prime ministerial bully pulpit is a powerful tool that can, and should, be used in some cases. But what we’ve seen today is a Prime Minister fuelling the vilification of an author, over an issue that doesn’t clearly relate to politics or politicians, and on a weak basis. If only one person is turned away from Hilary Mantel’s books because of his comments, it will be one too many.


You must be logged in using Intense Debate, Wordpress, Twitter or Facebook to comment.