Conservative Diary

« An ordinary government in extraordinary times | Main | Alternative Conservative economic strategies »

Huzzah! It looks as though childcare can be marked down as an area of Tory-Lib Dem cooperation

By Peter Hoskin
Follow Peter on Twitter

A cursory glance at today’s papers, and you might feel rather cynical about the Coalition’s prospects. There’s news of yet more tension between the Conservatives and the Lib Dems: Nick Clegg has told Theresa May that he will block her proposed web-monitoring plans. And, alongside that, the Times’s Rachel Sylvester writes (£) that the two parties have arrived at a new, bleaker stage in their relationship. “Things have settled down into a “state of resigned compliance,” is how she puts it.

But there is another story which suggests there’s life in this union yet. Newsnight’s Allegra Stratton is reporting that David Cameron and Nick Clegg are preparing to announce, in January, new policies to reduce the cost of childcare. There are, as she says, questions remaining about the details, but so far it sounds like a mix of Conservative priorities (making some childcare tax deductible) and Liberal Democrat ones too (tighter qualifications for child minders).

Childcare was one of the items I included on my list of five suggestions for renewed Tory-Lib Dem cooperation, back in September. As I said back then, it is an area of shared priority for Liz Truss and Nick Clegg, even if they disagree on some of the policy specifics. That those differences appear to have been smoothed out is testament to the surprisingly Coalitious nature of the Department for Education, where Ms Truss is a minister. There were concerns that the Department could collapse under the combined political weight of Michael Gove and David Laws — but, so far at least, it appears to be churning out policies with happy frequency.

The question now is whether this sense of cooperation will last. As the election approaches, both halves of the Coalition will want to point to such childcare policies as proof that they are acting to ease the squeeze on low-to-middle-class incomes. And they will both want to pitch themselves to female voters, too. There could well be a struggle to claim ownership. 


You must be logged in using Intense Debate, Wordpress, Twitter or Facebook to comment.