Fleet Street rejects Gordon Brown's lies about 'Tory cuts'
I'm in danger of repeating my post of yesterday but Fleet Street's reaction to yesterday's 10% cuts debate isn't good for Brown. In fact, it's damning. Every serious commentator is rejecting the Prime Minister's argument that the choice is between Labour investment and Tory cuts. Like the BBC, they are all saying that the next government - of whatever colour - will have to make cuts:
"Figures hidden in the Budget reveal that after 2011 Labour would slash the money going to public services by 7 per cent in real terms - contradicting Mr Brown's claims it will increase." - Daily Mail
"Mr Brown’s primary tactic for restraining public spending is through savage cuts in capital projects such as transport infrastructure, hospital and school building and military equipment. The prime minister did not seem keen to reveal that he plans an almost 40 per cent cut in cash capital spending between 2011 and 2014." - FT
The Sun Says column accuses Gordon Brown of being "desperate and deceitful".
On Today this morning, debating with Philip Hammond MP, the new Chief Secretary to the Treasury, Liam Byrne, sounded slippery - constantly evading John Humphrys' 'yes or no' questions.
A number of newspapers, including The Independent and The Times, also report the unhappiness of Andrew Lansley's shadow cabinet colleagues at the protected status he has won for health.
ConHome worried about the protected status of health yesterday. The Daily Telegraph joins our argument today:
Tim Montgomerie
Comments