David Lidington MP: A serious Conservative Party must reject this referendum motion

David Lidington is Minister for Europe.

Earlier this year, the European Union Act 2011 became law. This and any future government is now obliged by statute to hold a referendum before it can ratify a new treaty or treaty amendment that transfers powers or competences from this country to the EU.  That’s a Conservative manifesto pledge delivered by the Coalition Government.

With that safeguard in place, the debate within the Conservative Party is about the future shape of Britain’s relationship with the EU. The crisis in the Eurozone has reminded us that jobs and prosperity here are inextricably linked to what happens elsewhere in Europe. It’s important that we get the relationship right. My view remains that set out in our 2010 manifesto: it’s in our national interest to be in the EU but I’d like a more flexible, less centralised model of European cooperation, including key powers returned from the EU to the UK.

It’s in this context that I take the view that today’s motion is the wrong approach. The original petition was for a referendum on Britain’s EU membership but that sharp division between the status quo and quitting the EU does not reflect the breadth of views held in the party or the country. Understandably, the colleagues proposing the motion have amended the original petition to include a third option of renegotiation. But it has been left completely unclear what this means in practice.

David Lidington MP: Why every Conservative can be proud of the European Union Bill

David Lidington is Minister for Europe.

This week the new European Union Bill will go through intense scrutiny by MPs as its details are debated, and rightly so. The EU bill is the most radical piece of legislation on how we handle the EU since Britain joined the then EEC in 1973.

That organisation has changed a very great deal since then. In the past twenty years we have had treaty after treaty: Maastricht, Amsterdam, Nice, the failed EU Constitution and its substantially similar successor Lisbon. These treaties have given the EU such a wide-ranging role that it can no longer be right that the EU’s powers should grow still further without the explicit permission of the British people.

The way the EU has developed has not been wholly without democratic legitimacy: with the crucial exception of the EU Constitution and Lisbon, it is true that all of those treaties had their place in the general election manifestos of the party that went on to win the general election. That great exception proves, however, that we can no longer simply trust governments to let voters in on the most important decisions made in their name in the EU: decisions on where power ultimately lies.

The anger felt by so many on how Labour MPs, with a few honourable exceptions, denied the British people a referendum on the Lisbon Treaty will not disappear quickly. I dearly wish we could undo what Labour did. Unfortunately, that is no longer possible now that the Lisbon Treaty is in force. But what we can do is to stop that shameful episode ever happening again. That is what this Bill does.

David Lidington MP: What my Northern Ireland portfolio entails

David Lidington is MP for Aylesbury and Shadow Secretary of State for Northern Ireland

My brief includes three key tasks. The first is to hold Ministers to account in Parliament. We agree with the government’s objective of getting devolution and power-sharing restored. But devolution won’t work unless every political party in the Executive is wholeheartedly committed to democratic and peaceful politics. That is why we have constantly repeated the need for Sinn Fein to endorse the police and the courts.

Northern Ireland should not be a topic for partisan point-scoring. But bi-partisanship does not amount to a blank cheque. Conservatives led a cross-party alliance that forced Peter Hain to abandon his Bill to give an amnesty to terrorists on the run and we frequently criticised Government plans for community restorative justice. We shall continue to challenge Ministers over these issues.

The second task is dealing with Northern Ireland legislation. With devolution suspended, not only Northern Ireland Office measures on the peace process and security, but legislation from the eleven Stormont Departments goes through Westminster. The procedure for the latter is undemocratic: a two and a half hour committee debate, with no power to move amendments. Outside Northern Ireland, they go unreported. Yet the subject matter is often important: the budget for public spending in Northern Ireland, local government taxation, changes to education and health, and the re-organisation of the water industry.

David Lidington MP: Sinn Fein must demonstrate a permanent commitment to exclusively peaceful politics

David Lidington MP is Shadow Secretary of State for Northern Ireland.

The present government deserves credit for the time and energy that they have given to Northern Ireland. Tony Blair, like John Major, recognised that the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom had a duty to deal with the appalling violence, lawlessness and social division that beset part of our own country.  The Belfast Agreement of 1998, approved by the people of Northern Ireland in a referendum, was a remarkable political achievement.

Life in Northern Ireland today is better than 10 or 20 years ago. You can go shopping or clubbing in Belfast without worrying about bombs. Employment has risen. People are more prosperous. Not only in Belfast but in towns and cities like Ballymena and Newry, you see visible evidence of economic growth and urban regeneration.

But the political optimism of 1998 has gone. Unionist confidence was undermined by the seven year delay before the IRA carried out large-scale decommissioning and by continuing republican involvement in crime. Government side-deals with Sinn Fein have made things worse. We had prisoners released without decommissioning, the ill-fated Bill to give an effective amnesty to terrorists on-the-run and the special arrangements to give Sinn Fein MPs parliamentary allowances even though they refuse to attend Parliament. The revelation that, in December 2004, while Sinn Fein was negotiating for a deal with the DUP, the IRA was planning the Northern Bank raid for 23 December, shattered any hope of unionists trusting republican promises.

Direct Rule is a badly flawed form of government. I want to see devolution restored and the ground rules devolved government are fairly clear. Everyone has to accept, even if they might wish it otherwise, that Northern Ireland is part of the United Kingdom and will remain so for as long as that is the wish of the people. There should be power-sharing between unionists and nationalists. Both communities in Northern Ireland are entitled to respect for their British or Irish identity, their respective traditions and political aspirations. There should be close economic and political relationships between Northern Ireland and the Republic, and between the Republic and the United Kingdom.

I want to see Northern Ireland remain part of the United Kingdom but I have to recognise that a very large minority of the population wishes otherwise. Similarly, I have to accept the disagreeable truth that more than a fifth of voters supported Sinn Fein candidates last May.

But one basic principle needs to be clear and unambiguous. Any political party that is entitled to have Ministers in a devolved Executive must support the police, the courts and the rule of law. We cannot have Ministers in Belfast who are “inextricably linked” (Tony Blair’s and Bertie Ahern’s phrase) to a paramilitary organisation that is involved in serious crime and which still asserts that it is the IRA “Army Council” that is the legitimate authority in Ireland both North and South.

It is in everyone’s interest that the republican movement should complete its transition from terrorism to democracy. It has not yet done so. The recent IMC report concluded that republicans, including senior members of the IRA, were still engaged in organised crime, that they were still gathering intelligence on their opponents and that intimidation was being used both to drive people out of Northern Ireland and to maintain control over nationalist communities in the Province.

The IMC also reported on the criminal activities of the loyalist paramilitaries. They too should give up violence and crime. But loyalist political representation is tiny. They would have no Ministers in any Executive. That is why the political focus is on republicans. The onus now must be on Sinn Fein to show that its commitment to exclusively peaceful politics is both permanent and irreversible.