Conservative Home

« Howard Flight: The Conservative response to the banking crisis and its implications | Main | James Elles: Why I want to lead the Conservative MEPs »

Mark Field MP: Time to tell it as it is

Field_mark Mark Field is the Conservative MP for Cities of London and Westminster and an occasional contributor to

The state of the public finances is a national disgrace. Over eleven years of Labour administration too much government borrowing has funded current consumption. Instead of building a secure future we are borrowing from it and condemning future generations of Britons, some still to be born, to pick up the bill for the cost of current welfare, healthcare and pensions expenditure.

It is an approach which is neither prudent nor sustainable. It falls to Conservatives to condemn this cavalier approach to public expenditure and show the nation that there is a better way forward.

The recent banking bailout following the credit crisis has provided the government with an alibi for exorbitant levels of public debt which were already spiralling dangerously out of control. Public sector borrowing was due to reach £43 billion in the current financial year – we shall now be lucky to avoid doubling that sorry figure. Next year the total may well exceed £100 billion; that is around £300 million spending in excess of tax receipts each and every day of the year.

Just as it has been difficult for a bewildered public to grasp the true meaning of the wild fluctuations in the stock market in recent weeks, I fear that it will now be unaware of the seismic implications of the unprecedented level of government debt now locked into the system.

We must ringfence the billions accrued for the banking bailout from the enormous sums that were already on – and indeed off – the balance sheet. The new spirit of the age should be for value for money out of the public pursue – instead the idea of big government as an ever benevolent cash cow seems to be entrenching even further.

Remarkably, a narrative on the need for greater austerity has really not yet emerged. Whilst Conservatives no longer feel any pressure to match Labour’s spending plans nor to ‘share the proceeds of growth’, the urgent questions we now face are whether we are to match government on massive, costly infrastructure projects – or better still to make the political weather perhaps by promoting a fiscal stimulus by means of a targeted tax cut to the less well off which will readily be recycled into consumer consumption.

In truth there remains an eerie sense of calm in the ‘real’ economy. But not for much longer. For now the tumultuous collapse of the finance sector appears to many an isolated incident which has now been contained. Whilst the newspapers might be littered with credit crunch tales – falling house prices, squeezed company profits – I just do not believe that this crisis has really bitten the public yet, as demonstrated by the crush of shoppers at London’s new super shopping mall, Westfield, last weekend.

More worryingly this is coupled with a notion that however bad things get financially for the individual, the state will move to soften the blow, a perception that the government’s intervention to protect depositors in Northern Rock, Icesave and others has only served to increase. Labour is returning to its comfort zone with an economic narrative of interference in the name of protecting the public through continued high spending. We saw the Prime Minister developing this idea last week in the House of Commons as he sought to exploit the outcome of the US election as evidence of an international mandate for big government. If there is a lesson to be learned from Barack Obama’s success this should not be it.

For sure the world has changed but that is no reason for Conservatives to be bystanders – we must not be mesmerised by the tumultuous events into lacking the confidence to present a distinctive pathway forward. The era of cheap and easy money is now behind us yet too much government borrowing is targeted at short-term consumption rather than building for a better future. This was the case before the credit crisis and remains the case now. An increase in state intervention may soften the financial blow in the immediate term, but the looming level of interest payments alone on rising debt risks the lowering of living standards for decades to come.

It will soon dawn on younger voters that the unspoken message of the political class to anyone under thirty is that their generation will need to not only fund the cost of pensions for those who are older, but they will have to significantly lower their own financial expectations when the time comes for them to retire. The availability of cheap goods – clothes, technology, alcohol – has created a false sense of material wealth in the young. Unfortunately the longer term prospect of being able to pay off student debt, enjoy a standard of living as good as their parents, live on a decent pension for a retirement likely to last decades and expect a generous range of state benefits that those currently in retirement take for granted looks less rosy.

Any failure by government rapidly to grasp this nettle risks serious social unrest in the decades ahead. Our society will otherwise be economically divided as never before between old and young; those working in the comparatively secure and well-pensioned public sector and those in private wealth creation; those with globally transferable opportunities and others in an increasing tail of low-skilled, chaotic lifestyles.

Conservatives need to connect these realities and provide a convincing financial and moral narrative as to the importance of balancing the collective books. Outside of wartime it is almost unique for any generation to conclude (as is the case today) that its children and grandchildren will most likely be worse off than it has been. Unless radical action is taken to halt and reverse these unsustainable levels of public sector borrowing and to re-educate people as to the economic realities of maintaining a cradle-to-grave welfare state, that will be the sorry fate to befall the future generations of Britons.

At the next election we can offer the electorate change and a distinctive agenda which shows we are ahead of the game. If the best of times are to lie ahead the Conservatives must make the case for a smaller, more efficient State and understand there is an untapped appetite amongst our fellow Britons for discipline and prudence. We should relish the real opportunity that comes with giving the bewildered general public a convincing narrative for the future based upon our enduring principles.


You must be logged in using Intense Debate, Wordpress, Twitter or Facebook to comment.