By Mark Wallace
Follow Mark on Twitter.
In the 1990s, after the Queen's famous annus horribilis, royalists had good reason to fear for the future of Britain's constitutional monarchy.
They Royal Family seemed to have developed the opposite of a Midas touch, running into PR disaster after PR disaster, and republicanism had become a fashionable view.
Less than 20 years on, the picture looks very different. Confidence in the future of the monarchy has reached an all-time high, while republican support languishes at around 17% in the polls. The Royal Wedding, the Queen's jubilee and now the birth of George, a future king, have put the House of Windsor on a three-year roll.
The reaction of the republican rump has not been a graceful one. The Observer waxes lyrical about an undemocratic injustice which is "at odds with modern Britain" - without seeming to consider that the majority of modern Britain disagrees with them. (As an aside, they also gripe that Kate's inconsiderate production of a male baby means that "while the law of male primogeniture has been abandoned, tradition is maintained"). Joan Smith in the Independent on Sunday takes the route of outright denial, announcing that "this has been a good week to be a republican".
Subscribe to this blog's feed