Twenty-five taxpayer-funded groups that should lose their welfare cheques
By Matt Sinclair of The TaxPayers' Alliance.
Yesterday, LeftWatch followed up on its attack on the taxpayer-funded Family and Parenting Institute's intervention in the political debate over whether marriage should be recognised in the tax system. Ed West, at the Telegraph, has argued that taxpayer funded campaigning 'charities' should have their funding cut. The new blog asked "What other taxpayer funded charities should lose their welfare cheques?"
Trade associations
- The Local Government Association - £14.8 million
- The NHS Confederation - £7.0 million
- The Association of Police Authorities - £1.4 million
- Alcohol Concern - £515,000
- Sustain - £380,508
- National Heart Forum - £315,000
- Action on Smoking and Health - £191,000
- Living Streets - £150,000
- Family Planning Association (fpa) - £130,000
- Alliance House Foundation and the Institute for Alcohol Studies - £76,236
- Consensus Action on Salt and Health - £23,500
- The Sustainable Development Commission - £4.1 million
- The Forum for the Future - £1.6 million
- The Campaign for Better Transport (Transport 2000) - £417,210
- The Climate Group - £186,523
- Friends of the Earth - £153,994
- The Green Alliance - £137,120
- UK Public Health Association - £84,090
- People and Planet - £73,833
- Women's Environmental Network - £25,725
- The Islamic Foundation for Ecology and Environmental Sciences - £3,500
- New Economics Foundation - £601,518
- Demos - £553,004
- The Institute for Public Policy Research - £350,330
- The New Local Government Network - £117,972
We'll need to be avoid any accusation of ideological bias though, and while none of our FOIs for the report came back with funding to centre-right groups, it was worrying to see a number of joint fringe meetings organised by centre right think-tanks and taxpayer funded groups in Manchester this year (such joint meetings at party conferences often come with substantial funding attached). No doubt we'll find out more about that when we repeat this exercise next year.
Comments