Do you remember what it was like when Tony Blair was Prime Minister? With constant feuding between Numbers Ten and Eleven Downing Street, government became almost impossible. And as the handover to Gordon Brown neared, it seemed that everybody who had ever worked with him was lining up to have a go at him. So six months on, I thought I’d see if their assessment of his character was fair, now we have seen Gordon Brown in office.
1. Meaningless soundbites. ‘[Brown] is the master of the meaningless soundbite, an initiative a day… They are gathering eye-catching policies for the first 100 days, though he will also want to keep some back for the General Election’ (unnamed Brown supporter).
Well, if as Chancellor he was the master of the meaningless soundbite, as Prime Minister, Gordon Brown has surpassed himself. When he promised “British jobs for British workers”, he knew that any policy that actually delivered that would be illegal. And now we know that of the 1.7 million jobs created since 1997, 1.4 million of them have gone to immigrants.
2. Stalinist ruthlessness. ‘You cannot help admire the sheer Stalinist ruthlessness of it all’ (Andrew Turnbull, former Cabinet Secretary).
What could be more Stalinist than Gordon Brown’s cynical approach to Tony Blair’s education reforms? When he was in his ‘counter-intuitive’ phase, he was keen to emphasise the fact that he was retaining Lord Adonis as an education minister, and he said he would massively extend the number of city academies. But then Ed Balls let it slip that they were going to quietly kill the academies, by restoring the role of local education authorities.
3. Control freak. ‘It's a controlling thing – [Brown] thinks he has to control everything’ (Charles Clarke).
Charles Clarke might have said this in public, but I’m sure David Miliband and Lord West are saying just the same thing in private. Can you think of any other foreign secretary who has had his speech torn up and re-written by Downing Street? Can you think of a minister who has had such an obvious dressing down as when Lord West said that the case for extending 28 days had not yet been made?
4. Psychological flaws. ‘You know Gordon, he feels so vulnerable and insecure. He has these psychological flaws’ (‘Blair aide’).
When Gordon Brown let the speculation about an early general election get out of hand, only to back down when he saw the opinion polls, there must have been much mirth amongst the Blairites. The arrogance, the dithering, followed by the pathetic climbdown was just the sort of behaviour they had predicted.
5. Macavity quality. ‘The Chancellor has a Macavity quality. He is not there when there is dirty work to be done’ (Andrew Turnbull, former Cabinet Secretary).
Macavity the Cat has been at it again this week. Knowing that the public hate the renamed European Constitution, and knowing that he has broken his manifesto promise to hold a referendum, Gordon Brown really didn’t want to be photographed signing the treaty with the other European heads of government. So, he agreed to go to the Liaison Committee for his evidence session, knowing it clashed, and deliberately double-booking himself.
6. Team player? ‘The idea that he's a team player is utterly ludicrous’ (former Permanent Secretary).
When the David Abrahams ‘donorgate’ scandal erupted, Gordon Brown’s first reaction was, of course, to hide behind other people. Peter Watt, the Labour Party General Secretary, was forced to carry the can and resign. And in his regular press conference, the Prime Minister studiously refused to back Harriet Harman – deliberately using her as a human shield. How chivalrous.
7. Lacks honesty and integrity. ‘Gordon is his own worst enemy. Brown’s behaviour showed he lacked the honesty, integrity and trustworthiness required’ (Unnamed Minister).
I don’t need to elaborate this point at all. Gordon Brown was elected with a manifesto that promised a referendum on the EU Constitution. He broke his word. And the British people now know that he lacks the honesty, integrity and trustworthiness to ever win an election as prime minister.
8. Very cynical. ‘[Brown has] a very cynical view of mankind and his colleagues’ (Andrew Turnbull, former Cabinet Secretary).
Gordon Brown has used the British military for cynical partisan reasons in a way that I have never seen before. His decision to fly to Basra during the Conservative Party Conference, announce a troop withdrawal before he announced it to Parliament, and double count the numbers was the most cynical act of his career so far.
9. Absolute disaster. ‘It would be an absolute f*cking disaster if Gordon Brown was Prime Minister’ (government minister, reported to be John Hutton).
Well I probably wouldn’t use the same language as John Hutton, but with the first run on a British bank for 140 years, the HMRC lost data fiasco, and his own Party facing a criminal investigation, it’s pretty hard to disagree with the sentiment.
10. Bring back Blair. ‘I predict...in six months or a year’s time, people will be saying, “Wouldn’t it be great to have that Blair back, because we can’t stand that Gordon Brown”’ (David Miliband)
Looking at the opinion polls, I don’t think another Labour leader is what the general public want – but it seems clear that they can’t stand that Gordon Brown.
1, 3, 6, 7, 9 could easily apply to Cameron in my opinion.
Posted by: James Maskell | December 14, 2007 at 09:36 AM
Mr Maskell - Cheer up it is after all Christmas, the season of goodwill to ALL men! This is a perspicuous and timely deconstruction of Mr Brown's 6 months.
Posted by: James Burdett | December 14, 2007 at 10:39 AM
Didn't David Cameron promise an end to Punch & Judy politics when he was elected Leader? This article is a classic example of such pointless name calling. We have heard it all before. Yawn!!!
Where is the alternative Conservative vision that we can use to persuade and excite swing voters? If we offered such vision, we would be up around 45% in the polls and Labour would be below 30%.
It is time for the Shadow Cabinet to improve their performance. Abandoning paid outside interests would be a start. Poor performers should be sent to backbenches to allow new hungry MPs to take the fight to Labour.
Posted by: TFA Tory | December 14, 2007 at 11:25 AM
TFA Tory - explain to me how you can "take the fight to Labour" without criticising the Government? To win an election we're going to need to highlight every single failure of Gordon Brown's government and articulate a Conservative vision. Theresa has recently written about rape policy, equal pay policy (she is Shadow Minister for Women), and European laws policy (as Shadow Leader of the House). Are they not positive policies?
I love these amateur strategists who post on Conservative Home. Who needs Steve Hilton and Andy Coulson when you have TFA Tory?
Posted by: Big Phil | December 14, 2007 at 11:40 AM
James Maskell - Cameron an 'absolute disaster'?? Come off it now.
Posted by: Edison Smith | December 14, 2007 at 11:41 AM
Excellent piece Theresa. Thank you.
Posted by: Jennifer Wells | December 14, 2007 at 11:42 AM
TFA Tory displays the same schizophrenic relationship with politics that most of the public share. If the opposition is constructive then it is accused of being weak, if it opposes the government and highlights the failings it is accused of meanness and 'punch and judy' is referenced. The public like the idea of the boot being put into governments more than the reality of when opposition boot meets government backside. There is nothing wrong with pointing out in stark terms that this government is useless, it is what will create the space and the incentive for the public to seek an alternative.
Posted by: James Burdett | December 14, 2007 at 12:02 PM
Big Phil wrote "Theresa has recently written about rape policy, equal pay policy (she is Shadow Minister for Women), and European laws policy (as Shadow Leader of the House). Are they not positive policies?"
They are not the issues that swing voters raise on the doorstep. They talk about crime, immigration, transport, health, education and red tape. Swing voters on the doorstep want to know what we will do for them. Cameron was right when he said that Punch and Judy politics turn them off.
The voters know that the Government is failing. The polls show that they don't believe that the Conservatives can do better. Tackling that perception must be the first task of CCHQ.
Have learnt nothing from the last 10 years?
Posted by: TFA Tory | December 14, 2007 at 12:34 PM
Well in that case, TFA Tory, we'd only need a shadow cabinet of five people.
But you failed to answer my question - how can we "take the fight to Labour" without criticising the Government?
Posted by: Big Phil | December 14, 2007 at 12:43 PM
This is Benedict Brogan's view on his Daily Mail blog
"We've just had the last PMQs of the year, and Dave gave Mr Brown a Christmas present of sorts by using most of his questions to reprise his "Gordon's a disaster" shtick. Now, he does it well. Mr Cameron can nail a punchline like nobody else in that arena. But to my ear it sounded a little bit stale, like a Christmas repeat: comfortable, familiar, but not enough to overcome the festive lethargy. It allowed Mr Brown to escape in a flurry of indignation about the Tory leader's refusal to ask about serious issues...They next meet on January 9, and perhaps by then Mr Cameron will have found something new to ask about."
Spot on!
Posted by: TFA Tory | December 14, 2007 at 12:44 PM
Big Phil, it seems that we only have around five of the Shadow Cabinet working at any one time. So many have paid outside interests. Others like Peter Ainsworth, Oliver Letwin and David Willetts appear to have gone on strike.
James Burdett may accuse me of being schizophrenic but he at least acknowledges that I am representing the views of the voters accurately. They want vision and policies that will clearly improve the lives of them and their families. Negative campaigning appeals to the core vote but not swing voters. Ben Brogan agrees as the above quote shows.
Posters here know how bad the government is. We are committed activists and deserve better than a lazy puff piece that preaches to the choir.
Posted by: TFA Tory | December 14, 2007 at 01:00 PM
TFA Tory - You seem to be a master at reading what you want to see rather than what is actually written. Christmas doesn't come without the loss of a few turkeys, if the Conservative party wants an electoral Christmas it needs to slaughter the current bunch of turkeys. It is fast coming to the point at which everyone needs to work out whether they they want this cretinous mob to continue in office. If they don't then they are going to have to put up with sound of industrial scale plucking from the Conservatives as they seek to shred the reputation of this government. I'll extend the Christmas metaphor no further but suffice it to say that no party can win when the other side is not seen unfavourably, that is the point of keeping the heat on Labour. To that end Theresa's article is a cracker!
Posted by: James Burdett | December 14, 2007 at 02:37 PM
Well done Theresa. Brown is like an elderly relative who comes to stay, takes over most of the house, demands to be fed, drinks all your best wine and is too busy to talk to you. And then they win the lottery and finally leave, and you find they've sold your house. Still, what can you expect from a classic case of introverted narcissism?
Posted by: Jane Cadet | December 14, 2007 at 04:45 PM
I particularly like 1 & 8. It seems to me that too many "establishment" types (the Tory party is full of them) can't get their heads round new labour and Brown. Some of Brown's "sound bites" are actually brought out as policies and get taken seriously when they are only headline grabbing attempts at one upmanship against the Tories.
E.g. His incompetence and anti-British military lead directly to the Nimrod crash but "the establishment" just let the point sink in technicalities. Also, the sending back of the four Russian "diplomats" was probably a stunt to make Brown look internationally tough.
I suspect Brown is dead by now. What needs to be done is to relate individual foulups to what you would expect from a Labour government. E.g. I cannot understand why the recent international education statistics havn't been made something of, they are a disater that makes Black Wednesday only a little less of good news than the Argentinian surrender.
Posted by: David Sergeant | December 14, 2007 at 06:44 PM
I quite agree with you Big Phil @ 11.40am, and I am quite sure TFA Tory @ 12.34pm that Theresa May will get to crime, immigration, transport, health, education and red tape in due course, she could hardly tackle them all in one thread!!
Posted by: Patsy Sergeant | December 14, 2007 at 07:14 PM
The news wires seem to be hinting at the sounds of sharpening stones being wielded in the backrooms of nuLab. When you look at polls that would result in Straw and Millburn losing their seats it is no real surprise.
Posted by: Bexie | December 17, 2007 at 01:04 PM
Typing as somone in the marginal seat world, the Conservative policies are hitting home.
In the poorer sections, a focus on the loan sharks that prey on the poor, particularly at this time of year is hitting home
In the commuter belt both around London and in the North, a focus on the p*ss poor performance of the rail operators and network rail is gaining support for us
All be need is to promise to revise the anti smoking legislation to take us over 50%...
Posted by: Bexie | December 17, 2007 at 01:07 PM