By Thomas Cawston, Researcher at Reform
Last week Reform
made Andrew Lansley its “prestigious”
Reactionary of the Week for his decision to halt the NHS London plan
to redesign services to deliver quality care and reduce costs. Today we have
our Reformer. The resignation of Sir
Richard Sykes, Chair of NHS London, on account of Andrew Lansley’s
decision, demonstrates the level of anxiety among NHS leaders about the
Government’s health policy. Already the decision has
echoes of Tony Blair’s and Frank Dobson’s decision in 1997 to dismantle some
of the reforms of the previous Government.
NHS London led the way.
London is facing £5 billion in real term cuts by 2017, with hospitals required
to deliver savings of £2.4 billion. The capital has an unsustainable number of
hospitals, as Sir Richard Sykes claims “the current configuration of hospital
services is not making best use of taxpayers' money”.
The SHA plan would have sought to reduce the number of hospital beds by a third
and to close one in three
A&E facilities. 75 per cent of all visits to casualty and 50 per cent of
all out-patient appointments would be dealt with a network of 100 modern
polyclinics. Only through these changes could the NHS in London reduce costs
and improve services.