It was very exciting to watch Barack Obama being sworn in as President of the United States this afternoon. Whatever their views of an incoming President, any political junkie can't help getting swept up in it all. America does pageantry well, and today had immense historical significance. Moreover, these are especially challenging times for the new Commander-in-Chief.
The BBC does some things well too. They had assembled some interesting talking heads for the occasion, and it was nice to have an uncluttered screen. I was even willing to forgive the uncritical and wholly optimistic appraisal of President Obama. But there was an annoyance; Huw Edwards and Matt Frei both talked far too much.
I'd be fascinated to see independent polling on how welcome viewers find TV punditry and commentary. Of course some is very helpful - although I was surprised that when former Vice-Presidents Al Gore, Dan Quayle and Walter Mondale appeared in shot only Vice-President Gore got a mention. I can't help wondering if the Beeb's experts failed to recognise the others!
What is not welcome - and I can't be alone in this - is when commentators prattle over proceedings. The cellist Yo-Yo Ma and some other superb musicians played a lovely arrangement by John Williams, but the beginning was spoilt by (inane) chat.
So that we knew what was what throughout couldn't we just have had a caption or a very quick explanation and been allowed to drink in what was a special moment?
I'm fond of the sound of my own voice, and I also like to share my opinions with the world in written form. But there is a time and a place to hold your tongue. The rule of thumb should be that commentary and captioning should not impede listening to or watching the event itself.
Interpretation yes, interruption no.
