Assuming it's accurate (and others would know better than I), I want to know what our Front Bench team thinks about this from Cranmer.
I'm rather reminded of this story about Douglas Murray and the LSE. Apparently, these days, if you can credibly threaten to make enough fuss you create a "security issue" and get your own way. Of course, in the long term, people will (alas!) discover that more than one side can play at that game, and tolerant debate will become impossible.
