We're calling London for Boris
Polling stations are now closing...
Based on a wide range of conversations we've had throughout the day with people in the field and with senior Tory and other insiders we are very confident that on the basis of patterns of turnout, postal votes and canvass returns Boris Johnson has been elected Mayor of London.


















The right to buy council houses is indeed, David, a good thing in principle. In practice, however, only those who could afford it could do it and Thatcher's subsequent refusal of permission to build more led to a chronic shortage of social housing and those who'd utilised right to buy ended up absorbed into the middle class.
We are still reaping the benefits of Thatcherism not least in not having adequete social housing programmes, something which New Labour did nothing to rectify....that'll make a change then
Posted by:RedWedge | May 02, 2008 at 00:06
I'm at a bit of a loss as to why Boris is being described as a racist.
He has a much sharper mind than his detrators on this forum, despite what might be seen as his outwards buffoonery.
What you have to watch out for is the second preference votes. Here in North Tyneside we won the last Mayoral on first preference and had it snatched away on the second preference votes.
The price we paid for this was a third rate, second choice, first order buffoon of a mayor.
Posted by:tynemouth tory | May 02, 2008 at 00:09
Bit brave calling Boris the winner, we will see after the second run off :)
god i hope your right
Posted by:KEN4THECHOP | May 02, 2008 at 00:09
From what I have heard from others in Hillingdon it seems a candidate with some substance in the Ken Clarke type of way would have been a clear favourite to win despite lets be fair a lot of respect for Ken Livingstone across the board, having Boris Johnosn was a mistake and means its going to be close either way...and then if he wins, he'll probably cause problems for Cameron
Posted by:alan | May 02, 2008 at 00:10
you people are completely and utterly bonkers to have called it for boris on the basis of such slim information. i suggest that you stick some money on ken at seven to one which are ridiculous odds for a two horse race, in order that you hedge some of your abject disappointment when ken wins, with a little financial gain!
Posted by:jeff cushway | May 02, 2008 at 00:11
I, like many others I know, make a point of not talking to people with blue rosettes, so your conversations will be about as a pub survey of how many people like drinking in pubs.
The Conservative Party once again proving what idiots they are. As if choosing Johnson in the first place wasn't enough.
Posted by:MistressDaintyFidget | May 02, 2008 at 00:13
and still less accurate than my post which I didn't preview before posting...
Posted by:MistressDaintyFidget | May 02, 2008 at 00:15
baldy nick robison from bbc has run this story
http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/nickrobinson/
my god if the bbc is reporting Boris has won you may just be right
Come on BJ you can do
Posted by:HEADING4AFOOL | May 02, 2008 at 00:16
This page has been saved and will be offered to you tomorrow so you may wipe the egg of your face.
Posted by:Andy | May 02, 2008 at 00:21
I'm in shock. Portillo talking sense on the Beeb, making the point that Tory MPs have a lot to fear from a Boris mayorality.
If Boris sneaks it, the nation will get a clear two years to see what a mistake electing an old Etonian 'personality' is, and they may just well think twice before electing another.
Let's not forget, you lot wanted Greg Dyke as your candidate before you wanted Boris! Or have you all forgotten?
Posted by:Thismachinekills | May 02, 2008 at 00:22
This page has been saved and will be offered to you tomorrow so you may wipe the egg of your face.
Posted by:Andy | May 02, 2008 at 00:22
Having had 400 seats declared out of 4000. Labour have lost 9 seats so far. So surely the extrapolation would be 9 times 10. 90 seats. That is my brave prediction. :
Posted by:dirty european socialist | May 02, 2008 at 00:22
Not to forget Boris was third choice, so far as we know, behind Brian and Greg Dyke!
Posted by:Andy | May 02, 2008 at 00:24
Iain Dale - turnout in London 70% in places??
Wtf?!
Posted by:Edison Smith | May 02, 2008 at 00:26
HEADING4AFOOL, please tell me you're kidding. Tory boy Robinson is merely reporting the speculation on this blog.
Posted by:Thismachinekills | May 02, 2008 at 00:28
You see Red Wedge you are a microcosm of why Leavingsoon has lost. You, he, and that unpleasant Labour rump currently ruining our economy and country, are so bogged down in the politics of envy and a class war that you have not only lost but that everyone else has long moved on from, that no-one can take you lot seriously in any sphere of government anymore.
Posted by:Mr Angry | May 02, 2008 at 00:35
On Bexley, the north of the borough is very Labour, so it depends on how it breaks north and south. Also add Derek Conway into the debate in that area
Posted by:Rothers | May 02, 2008 at 00:37
Socialism- Everyone equal, tax the rich more and the poor less,
Posted by: RedWedge | May 01, 2008 at 23:45
Errr.. and so the abolition of the 10p tax band by a labour prime minister therefore doubling the tax on the poorest in society didn't happen then? Ok fair enough.
Posted by:MikeV | May 02, 2008 at 00:37
Oh and in one of the polling districts in my, solidly Tory, ward turnout was over 70% and all of it anti Leavingsoon and anti Labour.
Here comes another well deserved 18 years in the wilderness for Labour, possibly even longer, as more and more people realise what destruction Labour have wrought on what was a strong economy.
Posted by:Mr Angry | May 02, 2008 at 00:39
The idea that Boris was 3rd choice seems like myth and mischief to me. A few people may have considered approaching Greg Dyke and apparently even Brian Paddick, but we were already committed a primary process so the candidacy was not on offer to anyone.
Oh my, as I write this, Jeremy Vine is doing some absurd cowboy routine with a cringeworthy accent. When did election results become Comic Relief?
Posted by:Rob | May 02, 2008 at 00:44
God I hope not. How ironic that the people living outside London can vote in a Tory mayor for the inner city. My only consolation is that this buffoon might well do your party of the privilaged some serious damage.
Posted by:TheTruth | May 02, 2008 at 00:46
MikeV you clearly have no idea how the tax system works. Abolishing the 10p band does not 'double the tax on the poorest in society'. I hope your parents didn't pay for your education - if they did they should ask for a refund.
Posted by:Freddo | May 02, 2008 at 00:49
in politics, like in other walks of life, it can be costly to take one's wishes as realities.
another point. as a Muslim, if that blond man, whose conception of being witty is to be rude and insulting, wins it would not be necessairly a bad thing for Muslims. it would create a siege mentality and positive fear among Muslim londoners... they will learn to change their situation by focusing on their community instead of having just and decent English politican as mayor. by the way, this is not another wishful-thnking. sleep well, have a nice dream because tomorrow it is nightmare for u.
Posted by:Mohamed | May 02, 2008 at 00:52
Mr Angry I am amused that you consider the economy was strong before Labour came in. You must be forgetting, or ignoring, the early nineties. That said, much of the continuous economic growth of the last 10 years has been an illusion I think, based on selling houses to each other for ever more ridiculous prices. You will never convince me that a Tory government would have prevented this situation - believing as it does on limited regulation and maximum individual 'freedom' (or greed...depending on your point of view). It's a great shame that a Labour government wasn't brave enough to intervene.
The result of all this will be that Labour will lose the next election on the grounds of economic (in)competance, leaving the Tories to take over - which will only encourage more of the same. Sad times indeed.
Posted by:bigdave | May 02, 2008 at 01:03
London will have to deal with the consequences of electing a man who doesn't represent it
A comment like this really tells you all you need to know about socialism.
And I bet all you socialists reading this are baffled as to why.
Posted by:Alex Swanson | May 02, 2008 at 01:15
Isn't this a bit bold? While it may be encouraging to see high turnouts in outer London areas, the Ken-voting inner city areas also turned out in good numbers. I just hope that you aren't made to look the fool in 24 hours time.
Posted by:Pete | May 02, 2008 at 01:19
why are people so hateful? there's nothing so repulsive as the vision of the privileged classes in full throttle. will London follow Rome and elect a farcical phalangist? shame on you all!
Posted by:fifi | May 02, 2008 at 01:24
I don't see how a Tory Toff is going to help our capital.
What exactly is your problem? Just plain bigotry? Nobody would make remarks like this were based on race or gender but attacking someone because of his class (and don't forget BTW that Blair went to public school) seems to be OK.
If you disagree with his policies then say so. But simple abuse just demonstrates that the Left exists only for mindless hatred.
Posted by:Alex Swanson | May 02, 2008 at 01:41
I seem to have got some grief well up this thread for stating that turnout seemed just as high from the social housing areas than from our better streets. I agree it's a bit glib because everyone knows there are lots of Tories in social housing and vice versa, but is anyone seriously suggesting that if you were standing as a Tory candidate in inner London you would not stand a better chance if the ward was totally made up of £500,000 ++ Victorian terraces (our better streets) than totally of social housing?
That being the case, if you are trying to get a quick snapshot of where the high turnout is coming from, my quick social analysis is a perfectly fair way of doing it. It's an average, not suggesting total polarisation of politics between the two groups. [If you are left of centre and a representative politician you have the pleasure of representing more people who need your help with social problems, so your case work can make more of a difference to people's lives. If you are right of centre you are more likely to represent somewhere attractive and considered "desirable" to live. If you are a representative in inner London the two elements are often cheek by jowl so you can get the pleasures of both within one polling district.]
The Truth says: "How ironic that the people living outside London can vote in a Tory mayor for the inner city." How symbolic that this poster does not understand that the Mayor is the Mayor of Greater London - not just of the inner city - and that people in Bromley, Barnet, Ealing etc do not live "outside London". I live in inner London, but London's strength is both inner and outer London - they are interdependent. If Ken has lost, then perhaps it was the fact that he doesn't realise this that will have done for him more than anything else. Boris, also an inner Londoner, does understand this and therefore will be the Mayor of all of London.
Posted by:Charles P | May 02, 2008 at 02:01
I'm at a bit of a loss as to why Boris is being described as a racist.
Any Conservative candidate would have been attacked as a racist regardless. You are making the mistake of assuming that socialists are interested in fact or honesty.
Posted by:Alex Swanson | May 02, 2008 at 03:03
where are Conservative home bloging from tonight?
Posted by:Alex Agius | May 02, 2008 at 03:03
He coudn't run a bath! Let alone London.
Posted by:Robbie | May 02, 2008 at 03:08
have i got news for you....who suspects Boris' largest gaffe is yet to come!
Posted by:Dave | May 02, 2008 at 03:22
Good luck to Boris and you Londoners. Maybe, if you close your eyes and wish really, really hard, you can make Londonistan a western city again.
...if it isn't too late, of course.
Posted by:Warner Todd Huston | May 02, 2008 at 03:59
If Boris has won, London will be a very nasty place to live and work for the next four years, and Livingstone will have his work cut out for him when he returns to office in 2012.
Posted by:SI | May 02, 2008 at 04:37
Just got home from my own LA count. A night which I knew had gone well in N Wales when we finished ringing our pledges and I actually rang my ACD to say I couldn't believe the figures there must be something wrong! My own ward I won with 75% of the vote. Labour staring at meltdown nationally.
Posted by:Matt Wright | May 02, 2008 at 04:53
The result might surprise everyone. The predicted national share has Labour third, behind the Lib Dems. If that's repeated in London, the second round will be between Johnson and Paddick, not Livingstone. In which case, Paddick will win a landslide.
Posted by:Peter Clough | May 02, 2008 at 06:35
Peter Clough - nonsense. There's no reason why the national projection should reflect London voting patterns, and the cores of both parties in London are much stronger than the LD core.
Posted by:Tangent | May 02, 2008 at 07:01
The bookies called this for Boris some weeks ago.
Yes he is "home and hosed"
Posted by:Roman Abramovitch | May 02, 2008 at 08:05
Boris' win may be so (not as yet fact), but his foppish hubristic nonsense will be the biggest loss since the GLC in 86'. Those who want continued care and substance for London over pomp and racism should endorse Ken.
Posted by:Carl Packman | May 02, 2008 at 08:13
Nick Robinson gives it too Boris on BBC Today on the basis of Robinson's Interpol.
Red-wedgey. Pull your pants up, numbnuts.
Posted by:englandism.com | May 02, 2008 at 08:30
These morons who are accusing Boris of racism are unquestioning Guardian readers. They are stupid.
Posted by:David Galea | May 02, 2008 at 08:38
Socialists still seem to bring class into everything, promoting themselves as the working class and govern to look after the working class.
Therefore, by their own definition it's lunatics running the asylum.
Given by some of the comments from them in this thread, it's a fair assessment!
Time for people to know what they are doing to take over and think of everyone.
Mohamed said "...instead of having just and decent English politican as mayor"
Boris may not be english, but he seems just & decent, and given his origins, more likely to treat muslims better and not segregate them from the rest of society.
Posted by:LondonLX | May 02, 2008 at 08:45
Are you standing by this declaration, in the cold light of day? Even if your people had a good day, this doesn't mean victory.
Two cautionary notes.
1) remember 1992 (as others have said)
2) just because people are turning out it doesn't mean they are voting Boris. Indeed some commenters on PB are suggesting a *lower* turnout would have favoured Johnson.
I expect Ken to hang on, and I think you were very rash to post this, but we shall see.
Posted by:comstock | May 02, 2008 at 09:01
Is there any chance Boris could have taken it on first preferences?
Posted by:Andrew Lilico | May 02, 2008 at 09:29
Thinking along the lines that politicians like diapers should regularly be changed I think Johnson will win.
But what sort of man is he?
The killing of seals: Boris Johnson "The Canadian fisherman has as much right to go out clubbing as the average British 18-year-old"
"If you have men who will exclude any of God's creatures from the shelter of compassion and pity, you will have men who will deal likewise with their fellow men." - St. Francis of Assisi
Clearly, he has no compassion or pity for any of God's creatures. 270,000 infant seals have been targeted to be battered to death by brutal fishermen that attack not only such helpless creatures but any journalists documenting the slaughter. A report written by Danny Penman stated: "Six trucks then chased us across open fields and sand dunes and repeatedly smashed into us. Other fishermen pelted us with bricks and rocks. Several vehicles, including mine, were written-off in the series of attacks."
Posted by:John | May 02, 2008 at 09:29
Boris is an independent Conservative, just as Ken was an independent Labour politician - just what the weird and wonderful make-up of a city like London want (and the only sort of politician that can hope to get enough votes from such a huge single constituency).
Plenty of people just don't get him - his sense of humour, his pragmatic yet sometimes radical libertarianism, and the fact that he is very clever.
Posted by:EML | May 02, 2008 at 09:35
Morning Comstock! Are you ready for that run all the way down Oxford Street this evening? You're lucky the weather isn't going to be cold today - but you might get rather wet if there's a passing shower!
Posted by:woodentop | May 02, 2008 at 09:48
Boris must be mad! He is giving up a safe seat (Henley) in Parliament for London Mayor. I predict the Olympics will be a fiasco, hugely over budget, and he will take the fall for it. He will be out of work after the next election for Mayor. Maybe even Ken will take it back from him.
Thinking about it, it's a gift for Ken...let some other mug take the fall for the Olympics, have a sabbatical, and then come back!
Crikey Boris, you could have been 30 years an MP and then a seat in the Lords. Talk about throwing it all away?
Posted by:Anon | May 02, 2008 at 09:53
Equal in the amount that each of us pays in relation to gross earnings. It stands to reason that if you are fortunate to earn more then you should contribute more to society
Didn't realise that socialists are now supporters of a flat tax! Well done, comrade.
Posted by:Paul Oakley | May 02, 2008 at 09:55