Left Watch

« Lib Dems say the Tories only want tax cuts for the wealthy... or don't they? | Main | Balls has a far worse problem than his stammer »

Does Jonathan Freedland read ConHome before writing about it?

By Paul Goodman
Follow Paul on Twitter.

He writes in his column in this morning's Guardian:

"That was one among several moves that suggested Osborne's ear was finely tuned to the Conservative Home frequency. Its favoured groups did well, whether motorists rewarded with the cancellation of a 3p rise in fuel duty – the headline move designed to win tabloid cheers – or the elderly given a 2.5% rise in the state pension."

"Motorists" is fair enough.

But "the elderly"?

Tim Montgomerie supports "extra council tax bands for larger properties and a special tax on the sale of large properties"

See here.

Peter Hoskin backs plans for "the Winter Fuel Allowance, free bus passes, free prescriptions and free TV licenses for the over 75s) to be terminated for better-off pensioners".

See here.

And I've made the same point, saying "young people are getting a raw deal", argued for more housebuilding on greenfield sites, and urged radical reform to pensions and healthcare.

See here and here and here.

We don't treat offending the Conservative electoral base as a machismo test.

But we are at least as willing to criticise right-wing vested interests as the Guardian, say, is willing to confront left-wing ones.

We gave up on Polly Toynbee long ago.  But we haven't lost all hope in Jonathan.  Please try harder next time.